切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 241 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2022.04.007

论著

增材制造Ti-6Al-4V钛合金种植体骨结合的动物实验研究
李芸1, 舒天羽2, 郭四毓3, 乔栒柏3, 游云华1,()   
  1. 1. 中山大学附属第五医院,珠海 519000
    2. 西安交通大学口腔医学院,西安 710004
    3. 珠海乔丹科技股份有限公司,珠海 519000
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-18 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 游云华

Animal experimental study on the osteointegration of additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy implants

Yun Li1, Tianyu Shu2, Siyu Guo3, Xunbai Qiao3, Yunhua You1,()   

  1. 1. The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
    2. College of Stomatology, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710004, China
    3. Zhuhai Qiaodan Technology Co., Ltd, Zhuhai 519000, China
  • Received:2022-04-18 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunhua You
引用本文:

李芸, 舒天羽, 郭四毓, 乔栒柏, 游云华. 增材制造Ti-6Al-4V钛合金种植体骨结合的动物实验研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 241-247.

Yun Li, Tianyu Shu, Siyu Guo, Xunbai Qiao, Yunhua You. Animal experimental study on the osteointegration of additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy implants[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 241-247.

目的

探讨增材制造Ti-6Al-4V(TC4)钛合金种植体动物体内的骨结合和成骨效果,为进一步临床应用提供实验依据。

方法

选择健康雄性新西兰兔42只,以兔双侧后腿股骨髁部为种植体植入区,将实验兔先分为2周(A组)、8周(B组)2个大组,每组21只;每大组中再分为3个亚组,分别为A1组、A2组、A3组和B1组、B2组、B3组,每小组7只。A1组和B1组实验兔双侧后腿股骨髁部分别植入原始表面和表面改性TC4钛合金种植体各1枚;A2组和B2组实验兔植入原始表面TC4钛合金种植体和钛骨种植体各1枚;A3组和B3组实验兔植入表面改性TC4钛合金种植体和钛骨种植体各1枚;使2周、8周均含有3种种植体各14枚。术后2、8周观察并比较分析3种种植体的植入成功率和骨结合情况,观察指标为:骨体积分数(BV/TV)、骨小梁面积密度(BS/BV)、骨小梁厚度(Tb.Th)、骨小梁数量(Tb.N)和骨小梁间隔(Tb.Sp)。对各组不同时段种植体骨界面骨密度指标,使用SPSS 21.0软件包对数据进行双因素方差分析,验证不同表面、不同时间对种植体骨结合水平的影响,并采用Tukey′s多重比较检验分析组间统计学差异。

结果

3种种植体不脱钙组织切片、骨块微CT扫描及光学显微镜观察显示,随着植入后的时间进展,3种种植体表面骨组织的量逐渐增多,分布逐渐变密。2周时,表面改性TC4钛合金种植体组的BV/TV、Tb.N显著高于原始表面和钛骨组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Tb.Th显著高于钛骨组(P<0.05);BS/BV、Tb.Sp显著低于钛骨组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。8周时,3种种植体的BV/TV、BS/BV、Tb.Th、Tb.N和Tb.Sp差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

表面改性TC4钛合金种植体2周时即能形成更多的骨组织,骨小梁的分布更密集,骨结合能力更强,有望成为口腔种植体的优选材料。

Objective

To explore the osteointegration and osteogenic efficacy of additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V (TC4) titanium alloy implants, so as to provide experimental evidence for further clinical application.

Methods

A total of 42 healthy male New Zealand rabbits were selected. Implants were divided into three groups, i.e., the original surface, surface-modified TC4 titanium alloy implants and titanium bone implants. The femoral condylar of rabbit bilateral hind leg was used as the implantation area. The experimental rabbits were divided into two large groups, 2 weeks (Group A) and 8 weeks (Group B) , with 21 rabbits in each group. Each large group was divided into three subgroups, namely, group A1, A2, A3, B1, B2 and B3, with 7 rabbits in each group. One TC4 titanium alloy implant with original surface and one TC4 titanium alloy implant with surface modification were implanted in group A1 and B1, respectively. In group A2 and B2, rabbits were implanted with TC4 titanium alloy implant and titanium bone implant with the original surface. In group A3 and B3, rabbits were implanted with surface modified TC4 titanium alloy implant and titanium bone implant, respectively. There were 14 implants for each of the three kinds of implants at 2 and 8 weeks. At 2 and 8 weeks after operation, the implant success rate and osseointegration of the three groups were observed and compared for the following indexes: bone volume fraction (BV/TV) , bone trabecular area density (BS/BV) , bone trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) , bone trabecular number (Tb.N) , and bone trabecular septum (Tb.SP) . Using SPSS 21.0 software package, the data of bone mineral density at implant bone interface of three groups at different times were analyzed by two factor ANOVA to verify the influence of different surfaces and times on osteointegration. Tukey′s Multiple Comparisons Test was used to analyze the statistical differences between the groups.

Results

With the progress of osteointegration, both the amount and density of bone tissue on the surface of implants in the three groups gradually increased. At 2 weeks, the BV/TV and Tb.N of the surface modified TC4 titanium alloy implant group were significantly higher than those of the original surface and the titanium bone group (P<0.05) , while its Tb.Th was significantly higher than that of the titanium bone group (P<0.05) , whereas its BS/BV and Tb.Sp were significantly lower than that of the titanium bone group (P<0.05) . At 8 weeks, the differences in BV/TV, BS/BV, Tb.Th, Tb.N and Tb.Sp among the three groups of implants were not statistically significant (P>0.05) .

Conclusions

More bone tissues can be formed on the surface modified TC4 titanium alloy implants than the other kinds of implants at 2 weeks. The surface-modified TC4 titanium alloy implant could be a promising dental implant due to its strong capacity in osteointegration represented by much dense bone trabecular on the surface.

图1 不同规格、型号原始表面TC4钛合金种植体
图2 种植体亲水性测试 A:表面改性TC4钛合金种植体表面呈超亲水状态;B:传统钛骨种植体呈疏水状态;C:表面改性TC4钛合金种植体表面血液快速吸附并包裹;D:钛骨种植体表面吸附血液少。
图4 兔双后腿股骨髁种植体植入术后CT片 A:原始表面TC4钛合金种植体植入术后;B:表面改性TC4钛合金种植体植入术后。
图5 表面改性TC4钛合金种植体扫描电子显微镜扫描 A:1 000倍镜下种植体表面结构;B:10 000倍镜下种植体表面结构;C:50 000倍镜下种植体表面结构。
图6 表面改性TC4钛合金种植体能谱仪分析结果
图7 3种种植体植入术后2、8周微CT骨结合情况 A:原始表面2周;B:原始表面8周;C:表面改性2周;D:表面改性8周;E:钛骨2周;F:钛骨8周。
图8 3种种植体植入术后2、8周不脱钙种植体骨组织切片图像(低倍放大)A:原始表面2周;B:原始表面8周;C:表面改性2周;D:表面改性8周;E:钛骨2周;F:钛骨8周。
表1 3种种植体不同时段种植体骨界面骨密度指标比较( ± s
[1]
白石柱,张生睿,钟声,等. 3D打印及其在口腔医学中的应用(一)——3D打印技术的工作原理[J].实用口腔医学杂志202238(1):136-140. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2022.01.030.
[2]
王琬萌,李莺.三维打印多孔种植材料促进骨结合的研究进展[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志202119(5):306-311. DOI:10.19749/j.cn.cjgd.1672-2973.2021.05.012.
[3]
吕凌峰,吴东.钛阳极氧化表面性能的研究进展[J].中国口腔种植学杂志202126(3):202-205. DOI:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.06.011.
[4]
周万琳,李美华.选择性激光烧结3D打印钛合金种植体的制备[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报201953(6):593-597.
[5]
张玮航,张虎,李英姿,等. 3D打印激光快速成型牙种植体的制备及其机械性能分析[J].吉林大学学报(医学版)201743(1):52-56. DOI:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20170111.
[6]
孙晓迪,张健.数字化个性化骨增量在口腔种植中的研究进展[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志202021(3):189-192. DOI:10.19748/j.cn.kgxf.1009-3761.2020.03.013.
[7]
Shu TZhang YSun G,et al. Enhanced osseointegration by the hierarchical micro-nano topography on selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V dental implants[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol20218:621601. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2020.621601.
[8]
Hyzy SLCheng ACohen DJ,et al. Novel hydrophilic nanostructured microtexture on direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V surfaces enhances osteoblast response in vitro and osseointegration in a rabbit model[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A2016104(8):2086-2098. DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.35739.
[9]
王凌霄,单兆臣,高振华,等.亲水表面改性的种植体不同时相的骨结合情况和组织学观察[J].中国口腔种植学杂志202126(1):25-30. DOI:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.02.006.
[10]
李雪菁,邱小亥,赵宝红.亲水种植体促进骨整合机制研究进展[J].中国实用口腔科杂志202013(8):501-505. DOI:10.19538/j.kq.2020.08.010.
[11]
倪王成,胡琳驰,张维丹,等. 3D打印和CAD/CAM氧化锆种植体骨结合性能的动物实验评价[J].口腔医学202141(2):144-148. DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.02.008.
[12]
Javed FAhmed HBCrespi R,et al. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants:Factors of influence and evaluation[J]. Interv Med Appl Sci20135(4):162-167. DOI:10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.4.3.
[1] 王海燕, 张冬雪, 粟申平, 姜彤. 光动力联合龈下喷砂疗法对种植体周围炎龈沟液菌群分布改变的疗效[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 391-403.
[2] 李芸, 乔栒柏, 邓华颉, 游云华. 增材制造Ti-6Al-4V钛合金种植体在牙缺失种植修复中的临床应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 359-364.
[3] 黄晓琼, 邓飞龙. 种植体颊侧软组织开裂的研究进展及分类诊疗建议[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 10-14.
[4] 黄石头, 魏洪波, 李德华. 三维打印钛种植体性能及临床应用的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 1-9.
[5] 杨舒婷, 唐兢, 叶畅畅. 益生菌防治牙周疾病及种植体周围疾病的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 55-58.
[6] 杨雨虹, 李歆, 邓永强. 种植体周围软组织临床意义及软组织不足的防治[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 272-277.
[7] 安维康, 张薇, 郑亚飞, 马楚凡. 影响短种植体成功率的因素探讨[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 129-134.
[8] 吴斯媛, 艾毅龙. 微种植体支抗植入患者牙科焦虑的调查分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 171-175.
[9] 曹彦泽, 魏洪波, 董加一, 蔡榕, 李德华. 基于增材制造的口腔全瓷修复成型工艺研究进展与展望[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 65-70.
[10] 周震, 王亚敏, 杨熙, 刘文静, 张兆强. 改良骨劈开联合引导骨再生术修复上颌前牙区水平向严重骨缺损的临床效果[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 223-229.
[11] 黄容裕, 吴纪楠, 胡文, 钟锡鹏, 刘利思, 萧剑浩, 陈俊兰. 甘氨酸龈下喷砂联合引导组织再生术治疗种植体周围炎[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 28-36.
[12] 范毅杰, 李媛, 胡晓文. 不同颈部设计种植体在骨愈合期边缘骨变化的临床分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 169-175.
[13] 常尧仁, 周菁, 殷丽华. 头颈部肿瘤放射治疗对口腔种植体生存率的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(05): 306-309.
[14] 冼逢珠, 陈俊兰, 吴纪楠. 个性化全瓷基台在前牙种植修复中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(03): 202-207.
[15] 吴纪楠, 陈俊兰, 林少珍, 胡文, 李建平. Zimmer种植体在上前牙即刻种植与修复中的临床应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(05): 400-404.
阅读次数
全文


摘要