切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 171 -175. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2020.03.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

微种植体支抗植入患者牙科焦虑的调查分析
吴斯媛1, 艾毅龙2,()   
  1. 1. 佛山科学技术学院附属口腔医院·佛山市口腔医院正畸科 528000;广东省数字化口腔医学工程技术研究中心,佛山 528000
    2. 佛山科学技术学院附属口腔医院·佛山市口腔医院正畸科 528000
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-13 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 艾毅龙

Investigation and analysis of dental anxiety in patients with mini-implant anchorage

Siyuan Wu1, Yilong Ai2,()   

  1. 1. Orthodontic Department, Foshan Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology and Medicine, Foshan 528000, China; Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Digital Stomatology, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2020-01-13 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yilong Ai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ai Yilong, Email:
引用本文:

吴斯媛, 艾毅龙. 微种植体支抗植入患者牙科焦虑的调查分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 171-175.

Siyuan Wu, Yilong Ai. Investigation and analysis of dental anxiety in patients with mini-implant anchorage[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 171-175.

目的

研究微种植体支抗(MIA)植入患者牙科焦虑症的影响因素及术前焦虑程度高对术后疼痛的影响。

方法

采用改良牙科焦虑量表(MDAS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对2016年8月至2018年5月在佛山市口腔医院进行MIA植入的患者进行焦虑情况及术后疼痛程度的调查,共发出问卷553份,回收有效问卷509份,有效率为92.04%。采用成组设计t检验分别统计不同性别、年龄、文化程度、婚姻状况及收入水平间MDAS值差异是否显著,并采用两因素重复测量方差分析评估不同焦虑程度术后疼痛程度VAS评分差异是否显著。

结果

接受MIA植入的患者术前MDAS平均值为(11.24 ± 3.05)分,其中,大于11分占58.9%。男性患者的MDAS值为(9.85 ± 2.12)分,女性患者的MDAS值为(12.41 ± 2.56)分,差异有统计学意义(t = -12.18,P<0.001);12 ~ 18岁患者的MDAS值为(13.27 ± 3.12)分,18岁以上患者的MDAS值为(10.53 ± 2.36)分,差异有统计学意义(t = 10.51,P<0.001);未婚患者的MDAS值为(11.06 ± 2.96)分,已婚患者的MDAS值为(11.63 ± 2.75)分,差异有统计学意义(t = -2.07,P = 0.039);文化程度为专科及以下患者的MDAS值为(11.95 ± 2.37)分,文化程度为本科及以上患者的MDAS值为(10.46 ± 3.01)分,差异有统计学意义(t = 6.23,P<0.001);收入低于2万/月的患者的MDAS值为(11.13 ± 2.14)分,收入2万/月及以上患者的MDAS值为(11.58 ± 3.02)分,差异无统计学意义(t = -1.82,P = 0.068)。低焦虑组患者及高焦虑组患者在术后2、6、24和48 h的VAS值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结论

MIA植入患者牙科焦虑症患病率较高,与性别、年龄、文化程度及婚姻状况有密切关系,术前焦虑程度高患者术后疼痛的强度高。

Objective

To study the influence factors of dental anxiety in patients with mini-implant anchorage (MIA) and the effect of preoperative anxiety level on postoperative pain.

Methods

The dental anxiety and postoperative pain of patients with MIA implantation in Foshan Stomatology Hospital were investigated by modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) . A total of 553 questionnaires were sent out and 509 effective questionnaires were recovered. The effective percentage was 92.04%. Group t-test was used to compare the MDAS among different genders, ages, education levels, marital status and income levels. Two-Way repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the VAS score of postoperative pain in different anxiety levels.

Results

The mean preoperative MDAS of patients with MIA implantation was 11.24 ± 3.05, 58.9% of which was higher than 11. The MDAS of male patients was 9.85 ± 2.12 while that of female patients was 12.41 ± 2.56 (t=-12.18, P<0.001) . The MDAS of 12-18-year-old patients was 13.27 ± 3.12, and that of over 18-year-old ones was 10.53 ± 2.36 (t = 10.51, P<0.001) . The MDAS of unmarried and married patients were 11.06 ± 2.96 and 11.63 ± 2.75, respectively (t = -2.07, P = 0.039) . The MDAS of the patients with education level of junior college or below was 11.95 ± 2.37 and that of undergraduate or above was 10.46 ± 3.01 (t = 6.23, P<0.001) . The MDAS value of patients with income lower than 20 000/month was 11.13 ± 2.14, and that of income of 20 000/month and above was 11.58 ± 3.02 (t = -1.82, P = 0.068) . There was statistical difference in the level of dental anxiety among the groups of gender, age, education level and marital status, but no statistical difference was found in the level of dental anxiety among the income groups. The VAS value of 2 hours after implantation in low anxiety group and high anxiety group were 2.12 ± 0.78 and 3.13 ± 1.28 (t = -11.23, P<0.001) ; and 6 hours after implantation in two groups were 5.83 ± 1.25 and 6.54 ± 2.12 (t = -4.37, P<0.001) ; and 24 hours after implantation in two groups were 1.93 ± 0.65 and 2.09 ± 1.13 (t = -2.04, P<0.001) ; and 48 hours after implantation in two groups were 0.35 ± 0.12 and 0.54 ± 0.21 (t = -14.78, P<0.001) . There was statistical difference in the VAS value of different anxiety levels at different time points.

Conclusions

The prevalence of dental anxiety in patients with mini-implant anchorage is high, which is closely related to gender, age, education and marital status. The patients with high anxiety before operation have high intensity of pain after operation.

图1 微种植体支抗植入位置 A:右侧微种植体支抗位于右侧第二前磨牙与第一磨牙间颊侧膜龈联合处;B:正面咬合照示双侧微种植体支抗高度基本一致,微种植体支抗头部暴露用于结扎加力;C:左侧微种植体支抗位于左侧第二前磨牙与与第一磨牙间颊侧膜龈联合处
图2 微种植体支抗植入后全颌曲面断层片
图3 患者一般情况及牙科焦虑状况调查问卷
图4 视觉模拟量表(VAS)[8]
表1 509例患者不同分组下改良牙科焦虑量表(MDAS)情况及组间比较
表2 焦虑程度对患者术后各时间点疼痛程度的影响(分, ± s
[1]
Facco E, Gumirato E, Humphris G,et al. Modified dental anxiety scale:validation of the italian version[J]. Minerva Stomatol,2015,64(6):295.
[2]
Cianetti S, Lombardo G, Lupatelli E,et al. Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent,2017,18(2):121-130. DOI:10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.07.
[3]
唐彧,朱亚琴.口腔门诊成人牙科焦虑症调查分析[J].上海口腔医学,2013,22(6):695-697.
[4]
Humphris G, Crawford JR, Hill K,et al. UK population norms for the modified dental anxiety scale with percentile calculator:adult dental health survey 2009 results[J]. BMC Oral Health,2013,13:29. DOI:10.1186/1472-6831-13-29.
[5]
Sitheeque M, Massoud M, Yahya S,et al. Validation of the Malay version of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and the prevalence of dental anxiety in a Malaysian population[J]. J Investig Clin Dent,2015,6(4):313-320. DOI:10.1111/jicd.12106.
[6]
Zheng X, Sun Y, Zhang Y,et al. Implants for orthodontic anchorage[J]. Medicine(Baltimore),2018,97(13):e0232.
[7]
Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Orthod,2014,36(3):275-283. DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjt046.
[8]
沈坤雄,关小燕,陈露,等.当归芍药散缓解口腔正畸疼痛的临床疗效观察[J/CD].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2017,11(5):285-289. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2017.05.005.
[9]
夏卫静.优质服务理念在改善口腔科护理满意度中的效果[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(49):9595,9598. DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242.2017.49.066.
[10]
李丽娜.对于口腔门诊患者疼痛的心理护理分析及指导措施分析[J].中国伤残医学,2015,23(23):176-177. DOI:10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2015.23.136.
[11]
黄文娟.心理干预在缓解牙科焦虑症患者正畸疼痛中的效果[J].医疗装备,2018,31(14):93-94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2018.14.067.
[12]
张庆,陈文静,马龙,等.艾森克人格因素对正畸中植入微种植体支抗患者焦虑症和疼痛的影响研究[J].口腔医学,2015,35(8):644-648.
[13]
吴斯媛,宗丽,郑骏明,等.微种植体支抗不同植入部位对患者牙科焦虑症和疼痛的影响[J].广东医学,2017(12):1885-1888. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2017.12.026.
[1] 赵宏, 崔红, 宋雪杨, 曾敏敏. 儿童牙科畏惧症的影响因素及其与父母教养方式的相关性研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 111-117.
[2] 吴强, 张红梅, 吴和熙, 张锦华, 张婧宇, 寇君, 李琴, 潘畅. 经筋排刺法对髂胫束综合征下肢功能的影响[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 91-94.
[3] 曾心睿, 梁嘉敏, 王怡洁, 陈韵, 罗嘉莹, 王峰, 孙宝清. 嗜酸性粒细胞计数在变应性鼻炎患儿中的临床意义[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 138-142.
阅读次数
全文


摘要