切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 164 -170. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2020.03.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

儿童口腔医生使用局部麻醉的现状调查
韩欣欣1, 杜样1, 赵辛1, 王子瑞1, 汪璐璐1, 王小竞,1   
  1. 1. 军事口腔医学国家重点实验室,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,陕西省口腔疾病临床研究中心,第四军医大学口腔医院儿童口腔科,西安 710032
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-10 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王小竞

The current status of local anesthesia used by pediatric dentists: a survey

Xinxin Han1, Yang Du1, Xin Zhao1, Zirui Wang1, Lulu Wang1, Xiaojing Wang,1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China
  • Received:2020-01-10 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojing Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xiaojing, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81670988)
引用本文:

韩欣欣, 杜样, 赵辛, 王子瑞, 汪璐璐, 王小竞. 儿童口腔医生使用局部麻醉的现状调查[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 164-170.

Xinxin Han, Yang Du, Xin Zhao, Zirui Wang, Lulu Wang, Xiaojing Wang. The current status of local anesthesia used by pediatric dentists: a survey[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 164-170.

目的

了解儿童口腔医生使用局部麻醉的相关情况。

方法

对2018年9月至2019年2月随机抽取来自全国不同地区、不同学历及工作情况的527名儿童口腔医生关于局部麻醉使用情况进行问卷调查,并对影响局部麻醉注射技术选择的相关因素进行Fisher精确检验分析。

结果

共发放问卷527份,共回收有效问卷449份。449名样本人群中,阿替卡因使用率[50.78%(228/449)]显著高于甲哌卡因[26.06%(117/449)]和利多卡因[22.05%(99/449)]。医生局部麻醉注射技术的选择与学历(χ2 = 10.867,P = 0.045)及其从事儿童口腔诊疗工作时间(χ2 = 11.755,P = 0.029)有关。82%(367/449)医生认为下颌后牙浸润麻醉效果不佳,56%(251/449)医生选择牙周膜麻醉作为补充麻醉。6.68%(30/449)医生认为局部麻醉无并发症,93.32%(419/449)医生对并发症认知不足。

结论

阿替卡因和浸润麻醉是儿童口腔临床诊疗中最常用的局部麻醉药物和局部麻醉注射技术,牙周膜麻醉作为补充麻醉使用率高,但儿童口腔医生对局部麻醉安全性认识不足,需要加强学习以促进局部麻醉安全。

Objective

To document current practices of pediatric dentists regarding the use of local anesthesia by epidemiological questionnaires, hoping to provide theoretical basis for the use of local anesthesia in children.

Methods

Questionnaires of the use of local anesthesia were conducted among 527 pediatric dentists randomly selected with different academic qualification and working conditions from China during September 2018 and February 2019 and the data which could affect the choice of the injection technique of local anesthesia was statistically analyzed using Fisher exact test.

Results

Among 449 pediatric dentists, the percentage of using articaine [50.78% (228/449) ] was significantly higher than that of mepivacaine [26.06% (117/449) ] and lidocaine [22.05% (99/449) ]. The choice of the injection technique of local anesthesia was related to dentists′ academic qualification (χ2 = 10.867, P = 0.045) and working experience (χ2 = 11.755, P = 0.029) . The dentists who believed that infiltration anesthesia had poor effect in mandibular posterior teeth were 82% (367/449) . 56% (251/449) of dentists chose periodontal ligament injection as the supplementary anesthesia for treatment, The opinion that there were no complications of local anesthesia was held by 6.68% (30/449) of the dentists, and 93.32% (419/449) of the dentists lacked of sufficient knowledge of the complications.

Conclusions

Articaine and infiltration anesthesia the most commonly used local anesthetics and injection technique in the clinical practice of pediatric dentistry respectively. As a supplementary anesthesia, the use rate of periodontal ligament injection is at a high level. However, due to lacking adequate attention of the safety of local anesthesia, pediatric dentists should have intensive learning to promote the safety of local anesthesia.

图1 儿童口腔医生使用局部麻醉的调查问卷
表1 本研究449名受调查的儿童口腔医生性别、年龄分布[例(%)]
图2 本研究449名受调查儿童口腔医生工作单位性质分布
表2 影响儿童口腔医生常用局部麻醉注射技术选择的可能因素[例(%)]
图3 本研究449名受调查儿童口腔医生补充麻醉注射技术选择
图4 本研究449名受调查儿童口腔医生对局部麻醉并发症认知情况比较
[1]
Andreas D, Fernanda S, Margaret G,et al. Factors associated with dental fear and anxiety in children aged 7 to 9 years[J]. Dent J (Basel),2019,7(3):68. DOI:10.3390/dj7030068.
[2]
Fan S, Chen W, Pan C,et al. Anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration or periodontal liagament injection with articaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2009,108(5):e89-e93. DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.012.
[3]
Shilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN,et al. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anaesthesia in children[J]. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent,2015,33(3):173-176. DOI:10.4103/0970-4388.160343.
[4]
Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Advances in local anesthesia in dentistry[J]. Dent Clin North Am,2011,55(3):481-499. DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.007.
[5]
Solow RA. Local anesthesia for restorative dentistry[J]. Gen Dent,2014,62(6):18-20.
[6]
Abdelmoniem SA, Mahmoud SA. Comparative evaluation of passive,active,and passive-active distraction techniques on pain perception during local anaesthesia administration in children[J]. J Adv Res,2016,7(3):551-556. DOI:10.1016/j.jare.2015.10.001.
[7]
Donaldson M, Goodchild JH. Lidocaine turns 70:the evolution of dental local anesthesia[J]. Gen Dent,2018,66(3):6-9.
[8]
Uckan S, Dayangac E, Araz K. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2006,102(6):733-735. DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005.
[9]
Spivakovsky S. Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia[J]. Evid Based Dent,2019,20(2):42-43. DOI:10.1038/s41432-019-0021-x.
[10]
St George G, Morgan A, Meechan J,et al. Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,7:CD006487. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006487.
[11]
Gazal G. Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?[J]. Oral Maxillofac Res,2018,9(3):e5. DOI:10.5037/jomr.2018.9305
[12]
Pogrel AM, Stevens RL, Bosack RC,et al. Complications with the use of local anesthetics[M]//In:Bosack RC,Lieblich S,editors. Anesthesia complications in the dental office. 1st ed. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell,2014:207-218.
[13]
Meechan JG, Ledvinka J. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular central incisor teeth:a comparison of infiltration and intraligamentary injections[J]. Int Endod J,2002,35(7):629-634. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00532.x.
[14]
Chompu-Inwai P, Bua-On P, Nirunsittirat A,et al. Pulpal anesthesia in pediatric patients following supplemental mandibular buccal infiltration in vital permanent mandibular molars with deep caries[J]. Clin Oral Investig,2020,24(2):945-951. DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-02992-z.
[15]
Arali V, P M. Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine mandibular buccal infiltration compared to 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in children with irreversible pulpitis[J]. J Clin Diagn Res,2015,9(4):ZC65-ZC67. DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2015/12821.5856.
[16]
Salomon E, Mazzoleni S, Sivolella S,et al. Age limit for infiltration anesthesia for the conservative treatment of mandibular first molars. A clinical study on a pediatric population[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent,2012,13(Sppul3):259-262.
[17]
Moore PA, Cuddy MA, Cooke MR,et al. Periodontal ligament and intraosseous anesthetic injection techniques:alternatives to mandibular nerve blocks[J]. J Am Dent Assoc,2011,142(Suppl 3):13S-18S. DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0342.
[18]
Walton RE, Abbott BJ. Periodontal ligament injection:a clinical evaluation[J]. J Am Dent Assoc,1981,103(4):571-575. DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0307.
[19]
Alamoudi NM, Baghlaf KK, Elashiry EA,et al. The effectiveness of computerized anesthesia in primary mandibular molar pulpotomy:A randomized controlled trial[J]. Quintessence Int,2016,47(3):217-224. DOI:10.3290/j.qi.a34977.
[20]
Elbay ÜŞ, Elbay M, Kaya E,et al. Intraligamentary and supraperiosteal anesthesia efficacy using a computer controlled delivery system in mandibular molars[J]. J Clin Pediatr Den,2016,40(3):193-199. DOI:10.17796/1053-4628-40.3.193.
[21]
Garret-Bernardin A, Cantile T, D′Antò V,et al. Pain experience and behavior management in pediatric dentistry:a comparison between traditional local anesthesia and the wand computerized delivery system[J]. Pain Res Manag,2017,2017:7941238. DOI:10.1155/2017/7941238.
[22]
Brkovic BM, Savic M, Andric M,et al. Intraseptal vs periodontal ligament anesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction:quality of local anesthesia and haemodynamic response[J]. Clin Oral Investig,2010,14(6):675-681. DOI:10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7.
[23]
Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS. Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment[J]. Saudi J Anaesth,2016,10(1):81-86. DOI:10.4103/1658-354X.169482.
[24]
Dianat O, Mozayeni MA, Layeghnejad MK,et al. The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis[J]. Clin Oral Investig,2020,24(3):1281-1286. DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-03006-8.
[25]
Boopathi T, Sebeena M, Sivakumar K,et al. Supplemental pulpal anesthesia for mandibular teeth[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci,2013,5(1):S103-S108. DOI:10.4103/0975-7406.113307.
[26]
Birchfield J, Rosenberg PA. Role of the anesthetic solution in intrapulpal anesthesia[J]. J Endod,1975,1(1):26-27. DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80246-9.
[27]
Sam J, Sarah S, Deepa G. Intrapulpal anesthesia[J]. Drug Invention Today,2019,12(3):599-600.
[28]
Meechan JG. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia[J]. Endod J,2002,35(11):885-896. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00592.x.
[29]
Council on Clinical Affairs, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on use of local anesthesia for pediatric dental patients[J]. Pediatr Dent,2015,37(5):71-77.
[30]
College C, Feigal R, Wandera A,et al. Bilateral versus unilateral mandibular block anesthesia in a pediatric population[J]. Pediatr Dent,2000,22(6):453-457.
[31]
Adewumi A, Hall M, Guelmann M,et al. The incidence of adverse reactions following 4% septocaine(articaine)in children[J]. Pediatr Dent,2008,30(5):424-428.
[32]
Moore PA, Hersh EV. Local anesthetics:pharmacology and toxicity[J]. Dent Clin North Am,2010,54(4):587-599. DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.015.
[33]
Allen G, Chan D, Gue S. Investigation and diagnosis of an immediate allergy to amid local anaesthetic in a paediatric dental patient[J]. Aust Dent J,2017,62(2):241-245. DOI:10.1111/adj.12501.
[34]
Peroni D, Pasini M, Lurato C,et al. Allergic manifestations to local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia in children:a review and proposal of a new algorithm[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent,2019,20(1):48-52. DOI:10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.01.10.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[9] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[10] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[11] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[12] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[13] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[14] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[15] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
阅读次数
全文
6
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 0 0 0 6

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 4 2
  比例 67% 33%

摘要
140
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 140
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 43 97
  比例 31% 69%