Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05): 314-318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2020.05.007

Special Issue:

• Dental Education • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of improved mini-clinical evaluation exercise in clinical assessment of orthodontists

Lyuyuan Li1, Fang Ji1, Lunguo Xia1, Pei Pan2, Rongjing Chen1, Lingjun Yuan1, Bing Fang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai 200011, China
    2. Resident Office, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2020-05-06 Online:2020-10-01 Published:2020-10-01
  • Contact: Bing Fang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fang Bing, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Post-Graduation Medical Education Project of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine(Orthodontics Standardization Training Materials BYH20180208, Shanghai Orthodontics Specialist Base BYH20180308); Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital 2018 Clinical Teaching Incentive Plan(Oral Malocclusion System Integration Theory Teaching Team)

Abstract:

Objective

This study aimed to establish a clinical evaluation system for orthodontics candidates via combining Tweed analysis with mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) , and examine its effect in clinical assessment.

Methods

By combining the Mini-CEX method with Tweed analysis and supplementing the detailed scoring table, a new type of orthodontics teaching assessment method was established, which was called the modified Mini-CEX assessment. In September 2019, six in-trained dental resident doctors were randomly selected as candidates from the Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital. They were enrolled in the improved Mini-CEX clinical assessment, and their performance were evaluated by five senior orthodontic doctors. The obtained data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 21.0 software using Kendall′s coefficient of concordance test.

Results

The scores of five candidates exhibited a significant consistency among the examiners (W1 = 0.742, P1 = 0.001; W2 = 0.666, P2 = 0.003; W3 = 0.720, P3 = 0.001; W4 = 0.628, P4 = 0.004; W5 = 0.555, P5 = 0.011; W6 = 0.330, P6 = 0.1293) . All evaluation scores were significantly consistent in the following aspects: medical interview, physical examination, clinical judgment, health education, organizational effectiveness and overall performance (W1 = 0.620, P1 = 0.008; W2 = 0.588, P2 = 0.012; W3 = 0.885, P3<0.001; W4 = 0.625, P4 = 0.008; W5 = 0.835, P5 = 0.001; W6 = 0.930, P6<0.001) . The only aspect which failed in the consistency test was humanistic care (W = 0.147, P = 0.598) .

Conclusions

The improved Mini-CEX assessment was a convenient, comprehensive, fair and objective method which had good consistency among different examiners. Therefore, this method was expected to be applied to the clinical assessment of orthodontics.

Key words: Orthodontics, Educational measurement, Mini-clinical evaluation exercise

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87330582 E-mail: zhkqyxyj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd