切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 348 -354. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2021.06.004

所属专题: 经典病例

临床研究

改良上颌窦底提升术同期种植在上颌后牙区严重萎缩牙槽嵴病例应用的效果评价
呙誉东1,(), 鄢雷1, 张树新1, 闫明1   
  1. 1. 东莞健力口腔医院修复种植科 523000
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-14 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 呙誉东

Evaluate the clinical application of modified maxillary sinus elevation and simultaneous implantation in severe atrophic alveolar ridge of maxillary posterior region

Yudong Guo1,(), Lei Yan1, Shuxin Zhang1, Ming Yan1   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Jianli Stomatological Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2021-09-14 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yudong Guo
  • Supported by:
    Dongguan Science and Technology of Social Development Program(20211800902712)
引用本文:

呙誉东, 鄢雷, 张树新, 闫明. 改良上颌窦底提升术同期种植在上颌后牙区严重萎缩牙槽嵴病例应用的效果评价[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 348-354.

Yudong Guo, Lei Yan, Shuxin Zhang, Ming Yan. Evaluate the clinical application of modified maxillary sinus elevation and simultaneous implantation in severe atrophic alveolar ridge of maxillary posterior region[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 348-354.

目的

评价改良上颌窦内提升术同期种植在上颌后牙区严重牙槽嵴萎缩病例中的临床应用效果。

方法

选择2018年1月至2019年6月就诊于东莞健力口腔医院种植中心上颌后牙缺失拟行上颌窦提升术同期种植(剩余骨高度为2~3 mm)的患者50例。将纳入的50例患者进行编号,以随机数字表法随机抽取25例为实验组,其余25例为对照组。实验组使用改良上颌窦内提升术,对照组使用上颌窦侧壁开窗技术,对两组患者进行上颌窦提升术同期植入种植体,术后9~12个月进行二期手术及种植修复,戴牙12个月后随访,采集手术过程中及永久修复12个月后的锥形束CT(CBCT)数据。使用SPSS 20.0软件对种植体存留率、上颌窦底提升高度和穿孔率等计量资料来进行相应的统计分析,采用配对t检验进行比较,以P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。

结果

所有50例患者随访率100%,65枚种植体均无松动或者脱落,留存率100%。实验组和对照组术前剩余骨高度分别为(2.94 ± 0.31)和(3.06 ± 0.32)mm,差异无统计学意义(t = -1.395,P = 0.168)。实验组和对照组术后即刻提升高度分别为(10.90 ± 1.78)和(12.01 ± 1.88)mm,差异有统计学意义(t = 5.298,P<0.001)。实验组和对照组术后9个月提升高度分别为(10.14 ± 1.33)和(11.40 ± 1.38)mm,差异有统计学意义(t = 3.786,P<0.001)。实验组和对照组修复完成后12个月提升高度分别为(10.01 ± 1.22)和(11.18 ± 1.26)mm,差异有统计学意义(t = 2.474,P<0.001)。术后实验组采用改良上颌窦内提升术同期植入种植体31枚,涉及上颌窦25个,术中未发现上颌窦黏膜穿孔,但有1例患者术后第2天出现了术侧鼻腔出血的情况,7 d拆线时出血情况停止,3个月复查时拍CBCT,未见上颌窦内异常液平面。对照组采用外提升术同期植入种植体34枚,涉及上颌窦25个,其中3例术中开窗时发生窦黏膜穿孔,通过使用胶原膜进行修补,术后未出现任何不良反应。术后统计实验组黏膜穿孔率4%,远低于对照组外提升黏膜穿孔率(12%)。

结论

改良上颌窦内提升术在上颌后牙区余留骨高度为2~3 mm的临床应用过程中,可获得较理想的上颌窦提升效果,术后窦膜穿孔等并发症发生率低,短期种植效果满意。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcome of the modified transcrestal around detached sinus floor elevation technique and simultaneous implantation in severe atrophic alveolar ridge of maxillary posterior region.

Methods

A total of 50 patients (65 implant sites) underwent transcrestal around detached sinus floor elevation technique with bone grafting were included in this study in Jianli Stomatological Hospital of Dongguan from October 2017 to October 2019. These patients were randomly divided into two groups with 25 in each. The experimental group was treated with the modified transcrestal around detached sinus floor elevation technique while lateral window technique was used in the control group. A total of 65 implants were placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation. The second stage operation and implant restoration were performed nine months later. The patients were followed up 12 months after final restoration. Data of CBCT in the process of implantation were collected.

Results

Both the follow-up rate of the patients and the survival rate of implants were 100%. The residual bone height in the posterior maxilla of the experimental and control groups were (2.94 ± 0.31) mm and (3.06 ± 0.32) mm, respectively, where there was no significant difference (t = -1.395, P = 0.168) . The post-op height in the posterior maxilla of the control and experimental group were (10.90 ± 1.78) and (12.01 ± 1.88) mm, respectively, where there was significant difference (t = 5.298, P<0.001) . This height was found to be (10.14 ± 1.33) and (11.40 ± 1.38) mm, respectively, after nine months, where there was significant difference (t = 3.786, P<0.001) . Further, this height changed into (10.01 ± 1.22) and (11.18 ± 1.26) mm, respectively, where there was significant difference (t = 2.474, P<0.001) . In this study, a total of 31 implants were implanted in the experimental group for 25 maxillary sinuses. No perforation of maxillary sinus mucosa was found during the operation, but one patient had bleeding in the nasal cavity on the second day after operation. After active anti-inflammatory treatment, the bleeding stopped and then the suture was removed on the 7th day. CBCT was taken at the re-examination of three months, and no abnormal fluid in the maxillary sinus was found. In the control group, a total of 34 implants were implanted at the same time, involving 25 maxillary sinuses. Among them, three cases had sinus mucosal perforation during fenestration. The perforation lesion was covered with collagen membrane, and there were no adverse reactions after operation. The mucosal perforation rate in the experimental group was 4%, which was much lower than that of the control group (12%) .

Conclusions

The modified maxillary sinus elevation and simultaneous implantation can achieve a better effect in the cases with severe alveolar ridge atrophy in the posterior maxillary area. The complications such as perforation of the sinus membrane are low and the short-term implant effect is satisfactory.

图1 MegaGen上颌窦内提升工具 A:A型剥离器;B:B型剥离器;C:剥离器的各个部分(a、b、c段)及长度的测量示意图。
图2 CAS-KIT上颌窦内提升工具 A:逐级扩孔钻及止动环;B:上颌窦底检查工具。
图3 上颌窦底剩余牙槽嵴骨高度为2 mm时使用MegaGen上颌窦内提升工具时窦底黏膜的剥离过程示意图 A:牙槽嵴顶处上颌窦底黏膜剥离;B:上颌窦侧壁黏膜的剥离中;C:完成上颌窦侧壁黏膜的剥离。
图4 上颌窦外提升示意图
表1 50例上颌后牙缺失拟行上颌窦提升的患者两组患者一般资料的组间比较
表2 50例上颌窦提升的患者4个不同时间点提升高度的CT测量值对比(mm,±s
图5 改良上颌窦提升术锥形束CT矢状面图像 A:术前;B:术后即刻;C:种植后9个月;D:修复完成后12个月。
图6 16通过改良内提升技术种植修复完成后12个月复查 A:颊面观;B:颌面观。
图7 上颌窦底剩余骨高度分别在2~4 mm时,牙槽嵴顶进行5 mm宽的扩孔,使用B型剥离器完成上颌窦提升后所能达到的最大提升高度(示意图)A:剩余骨高度为2 mm;B:剩余骨高度为3 mm;C:剩余骨高度为4 mm。
[1]
Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions[J]. Dent Clin North Am198630(2):207-229.
[2]
Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery:The osteotome technique[J]. Compendium199415(2):152,154-156,158 passim;quiz 162.
[3]
王智,邹立东.微创技术在上颌窦内提升植骨中应用效果的影像学评价[J].口腔医学研究202036(7):688-692. DOI:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.07.018.
[4]
谭冠柳,胡晓文.上颌窦内、外提升术在剩余牙槽嵴高度4~6 mm时种植修复的比较研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志201419(3):111-115. DOI:CNKI:SUN:KQZZ.0.2014-03-002.
[5]
Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP,et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year lifetable analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res19978(3):161-172. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
[6]
Tallarico M, Cochran DL, Xhanari E,et al. Crestal sinus lift using an implant with an internal L-shaped channel:1-year after loading results from a prospective cohort study[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol201710(3):325-336.
[7]
戴俊峰,胡艳秋,王鑫.改良式上颌窦内提升术的临床观察[J].中国口腔种植学杂志201722(3):121-123. DOI:CNKI:SUN:KQZZ.0.2017-03-006.
[8]
周贤,胡秀莲.经牙槽嵴顶入路微创上颌窦内提升植骨同期种植技术[J].中国实用口腔科杂志201811(1):5-11. DOI:10.19538/j.kq.2018.01.002.
[9]
高巍,李良玉,张峰.经牙槽嵴顶入路两种微创上颌窦提升方法的应用及3~5年临床观察[J].口腔医学研究201632(6):643-647. DOI:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.06.022.
[10]
李源莹,王劲茗,古佩明,等.上颌窦黏膜囊肿对牙槽嵴顶入路上颌窦底提升术的影响[J/OL].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)201812(4):241-245. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2018.04.007.
[11]
黄建生.上颌后牙区骨量不足种植的风险与对策[J].华西口腔医学杂志201230(1):1-9. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2012.01.001.
[12]
Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M,et al. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II:Transalveolar technique[J]. J Clin Periodontol200835(8 Suppl):241-254.
[13]
楚德国.新型穿牙槽嵴顶上颌窦底提升骨凿临床应用研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志201630(3):151-155. DOI:CNKI:SUN:XDKY.0.2016-03-007.
[1] 李芸, 乔栒柏, 邓华颉, 游云华. 增材制造Ti-6Al-4V钛合金种植体在牙缺失种植修复中的临床应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 359-364.
[2] 黄晓琼, 邓飞龙. 种植体颊侧软组织开裂的研究进展及分类诊疗建议[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 10-14.
[3] 任静, 耿宁波, 周天任, 陈松龄. 动态实时导航辅助下颌后牙区牙槽骨骨量不足种植[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 27-33.
[4] 朱珠, 顾烨辰, 朱庆萍, 何峰, 张玮. 老年患者种植修复成功率与满意度的随访研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 21-26.
[5] 杨雨虹, 李歆, 邓永强. 种植体周围软组织临床意义及软组织不足的防治[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 272-277.
[6] 安维康, 张薇, 郑亚飞, 马楚凡. 影响短种植体成功率的因素探讨[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 129-134.
[7] 林娟, 李燕燕, 宋晓萌, 朱珠, 谢雯静, 张玮. 前牙美学区牙槽嵴保存延期种植的临床研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 92-97.
[8] 吴文震, 邱妮, 肖玉鸿. 一种非手术组织增量方法:正畸牵引在口腔种植的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 390-395.
[9] 武东辉, 曹少萍, 朱韵莹, 梁坚强, 苏静君. 伴上颌窦囊肿或慢性上颌窦炎的上颌窦底外提升术效果评价[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 108-114.
[10] 呙誉东, 周炼, 张东强. 帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量的临床应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 41-46.
[11] 钟奇帜, 孔令佳, 周振邦. 口腔颌面锥形束CT评估非手术治疗慢性牙周炎上颌窦的黏膜变化[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 235-241.
[12] 周震, 王亚敏, 杨熙, 刘文静, 张兆强. 改良骨劈开联合引导骨再生术修复上颌前牙区水平向严重骨缺损的临床效果[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 223-229.
[13] 赵莹, 林雪峰. 中重度慢性牙周炎上颌中切牙区解剖形态的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 369-374.
[14] 马婧, 曾融生. 慢性牙周炎患者与牙周健康患者种植修复疗效的对比与分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 299-304.
[15] 李源莹, 王劲茗, 古佩明, 李俊达, 陈美霖. 上颌窦黏膜囊肿对牙槽嵴顶入路上颌窦底提升术的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 241-245.
阅读次数
全文


摘要