切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 41 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2020.01.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量的临床应用
呙誉东1,(), 周炼1, 张东强1   
  1. 1. 东莞健力口腔医院种植中心 523000
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-21 出版日期:2020-02-01
  • 通信作者: 呙誉东

Clinical application of tenting screw technique on the horizontal bone augmentation of single upper anterior tooth

Yudong Guo1,(), Lian Zhou1, Dongqiang Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Implantology, Jianli Stomatological Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2019-09-21 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yudong Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Yudong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Social Science and Technology Development Program of Dongguan city(201950715058600)
引用本文:

呙誉东, 周炼, 张东强. 帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量的临床应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 41-46.

Yudong Guo, Lian Zhou, Dongqiang Zhang. Clinical application of tenting screw technique on the horizontal bone augmentation of single upper anterior tooth[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 41-46.

目的

对帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量的临床效果进行评价。

方法

选择2016年1月至2017年2月就诊于东莞健力口腔医院种植中心上前牙单牙缺失拟行分阶段水平骨增量的患者30例。将纳入的30例患者进行编号,随机抽取15例为实验组,其余15例为对照组。实验组使用帐篷螺丝技术,对照组使用常规引导骨再生(GBR)技术对两组患者进行骨增量治疗,在骨增量后6个月进行种植体的植入,植入4~ 6个月后行二期手术及种植修复,戴牙12个月后随访,采集种植修复过程中的锥形束CT(CBCT)数据以及永久修复12个月后复查的口内数码照片。使用SPSS 20.0软件对种植体存留率、牙槽骨水平向宽度、红色美学评分(PES)等计量资料来进行相应的统计分析,采用独立样本t检验进行比较,以P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。

结果

所有30例患者随访率100%,种植体无一松动或者脱落,留存率100%。实验组修复完成后12个月PES为(10.8 ± 1.1),高于对照组PES为(9.2 ± 2.1),差异有统计学意义(t= 2.698,P= 0.013)。实验组植骨术后6个月水平向骨宽度为(7.58 ± 0.27)mm,对照组植骨术后6个月水平向骨宽度为(6.70 ± 0.41)mm,差异有统计学意义(t= 6.953,P<0.001)。实验组修复完成后12个月水平向骨宽度(7.15 ± 0.44)mm,修复完成后12个月水平向骨宽度(6.24 ± 0.49)mm,差异有统计学意义(t= 5.349,P<0.001)。

结论

帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙牙槽嵴顶水平向骨增量过程中,可获得较理想的水平向骨增量效果及PES。但由于观察时间较短,其远期效果仍需要进一步的观察研究。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effect of tenting screw technique on the horizontal bone augmentation of single upper anterior missing tooth.

Methods

In total, thirty patients with single upper anterior missing tooth who needed staged horizontal bone augmentation were included in this study in Jianli Stomatological Hospital of Dongguan City from January 2016 to February 2017. These patients were randomly divided into two groups with 15 in each. The experimental group was treated with tenting screw technology while guided bone regeneration (GBR) was used in the control group. Thirty implants were implanted in 6 months after bone augmentation. A second-stage operation and the final restoration were performed in 4-6 months after implantation. Data of CBCT in the process of implantation were collected, and the intra-oral digital photos were taken in 12 months after the final restoration. Pink Esthetic Score (PES) in 12 months after restoration and alveolar bone horizontal width were analyzed with software (SPSS 20.0) . The independent sample t-test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used according to the data distribution, while the significant level was set at 0.05.

Results

Both the follow-up rate of the patients and the survival rate of implants were 100%. PES of the experimental and control groups were 10.8 ± 1.1 and 9.2 ± 2.1, respectively, where there was significant difference (t= 2.698, P= 0.013) . The horizontal width in 6 months after bone augmentation of the experimental group (7.58 ± 0.27, mm) was significantly higher than that of the control group (6.70 ± 0.41, mm; t= 6.953, P<0.001) . Similarly, significant difference was also found in the horizontal width in 12 months after bone augmentation between the experimental (7.15 ± 0.44, mm) and control group (6.24 ± 0.49, mm; t= 5.349, P<0.001) .

Conclusions

Tenting screw technique was a predictable method to maintain esthetic alveolar ridge in the upper anterior region with single missing tooth. However, due to the short observation time of this study, its long-term clinical outcome needs to be evaluated further.

图1 帐篷螺丝技术示意图[2]
表1 30例上前牙单牙缺失拟行分阶段的骨增量患者一般资料的组间比较
表2 不同植骨时间点骨增量患者牙槽骨水平向宽度的CT测量值对比(mm, ± s
表3 两组上颌前牙区水平向骨缺损患者术后1年的红色美学评分(PES)的比较(分, ± s
图2 帐篷螺丝植骨技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量后种植的典型病例治疗前后口内像A:术前正面观;B:术前颌面观;C:帐篷钉头部的位置(正面观);D:帐篷钉头部的位置(颌面观);E:放置Bio-oss骨粉和双层Bio-gide胶原膜;F:术后6个月口内照(颌面观);G:一期手术时保留牙龈乳头的切口;H:种植体植入;I:二期手术后;J:成型良好的穿龈轮廓;K:永久修复(正面观);L:永久修复(颌面观)
图3 帐篷螺丝植骨技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量后种植的典型病例治疗前后5个时间点的CBCT矢状面图像A:术前;B:骨增量后6个月;C:种植后即刻;D:种植后6个月;E:永久修复12个月
图4 帐篷螺丝植骨技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量后6个月采用针刺样切口取出帐篷钉
图5 对上前牙缺失位点进行水平向骨增量后6个月CT矢状面截A:常规GBR术;B:帐篷技术植骨(帐篷钉头部位于牙槽嵴顶);C:帐篷技术植骨(帐篷钉头部位于牙槽嵴唇侧外形轮廓的高点)
[1]
Yamada M,Egusa H. Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry[J]. J Prosthodont Res,2017,62(2):152. DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.010.
[2]
Chasioti E,Chiang TF,Drew HJ. Maintaining space in localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with tenting screw technology[J]. Quintessence Int,2013,44(10):763-771. DOI:10.3290/j.qi.a30178.
[3]
Buser D,Mericske-Stern R,Bernard JP,et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,1997,8(3):161-172. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
[4]
Furhauser R,Florescu D,Benesch T,etal. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:the pink esthetic score[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2005,16(6):639-644. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
[5]
Le B,Rohrer MD,Prassad HS. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2010,68(2):428-435.DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.059.
[6]
Le B,Burstein J,Sedghizadeh PP. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation[J]. Implant Dent,2008,17(1):40-50. DOI:10.1097/ID.0b013e318166d503.
[7]
Stimmelayr M,Guth JF,Schlee M,et al. Vertical ridge augmentation using the modified shell technique--a case report[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2014,72(2):286-291. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.004.
[8]
Urban IA.垂直向和水平向牙槽嵴骨增量[M].黄權,张鹏,马开宇,等,译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2018:151-151.
[9]
Daniel Buser.牙种植学的引导骨再生:20年的进展[M].宿玉成,主译. 2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2011:198-198.
[10]
Lekholm U,Wannfors K,Isaksson S,et al. Oral implants in combination with bone grafts. A 3-year retrospective multicenter study using the Brånemark implant system[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999,28(3):181-187. DOI:10.1034/j.1399-0020.1999.283280306.x.
[11]
Chiapasco M,Romeo E,Vogel G. Tridimensional reconstruction of knife-edge edentulous maxillae by sinus elevation,onlay grafts,and sagittal osteotomy of the anterior maxilla:preliminary surgical and prosthetic results[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1998,13(3):394-399. DOI:10.1016/S0020-1383(98)80217-9.
[12]
Edmunds RK,Mealey BL,Mills MP,et al. Maxillary anterior ridge augmentation with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2014,34(4):551-557. DOI:10.11607/prd.1737.
[13]
Cosyn J,De Bruyn H,Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations:a 1-year prospective study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2013,15(6):847-857. DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00448.x.
[14]
郭磊,洪峰,王远勤.即刻种植和早期种植对前牙美学区种植体周软组织影响的对比研究[J].口腔疾病防治,2017,25(4):245-249. DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.04.009.
[1] 李雪铃, 杨凌, 朱文军, 林雪峰. 铸瓷髓腔固位冠修复个别上前牙错位的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(03): 205-210.
阅读次数
全文


摘要