Clinical application and prospect of glass ionomer cements

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2023.04.011

Abstract

Abstract:

As a conventional dental restorative material, glass ionomer cement (GIC) has been widely used in clinical practice because of its outstanding properties, such as biocompatibility, adhesion and fluoride release ability, and it has a great development prospect. In this review, the chemical composition, classification, advantages and disadvantages, and the clinical application of glass ionomer cement were systematically summarized. The existing problems and modification researches of GIC were discussed in order to provide a reference for its better development and clinical application.

Key words: Glass ionomer cement, Dental materials, Cementation, Anti-caries, Fluoride release

Chuhan Zhang, Shujun Wang, Mengting Wei, Xinyi Jiang, Guanyu Su, Desong Zhan, Jiale Fu. Clinical application and prospect of glass ionomer cements[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 299-308.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2023.04.011

https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V17/I04/299

Figures/Tables 2

References 123

[1]	Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry [J]. J Funct Biomater，2016,7(3):16. DOI：10.3390/jfb7030016.
[2]	Wilson AD. Glass-ionomer cement—origins，development and future[J]. Clin Mater，1991,7(4):275-282. DOI：10.1016/0267-6605(91)90070-v.
[3]	Mount GJ, Makinson OF. Clinical characteristics of a glass-ionomer cement [J]. Br Dent J，1978,145(3):67-71. DOI：10.1038/sj.bdj.4804120.
[4]	Baig MS, Fleming GJ. Conventional glass-ionomer materials：A review of the developments in glass powder，polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement [J]. J Dent，2015,43(8):897-912. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.004.
[5]	Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. The effect of storage in aqueous solutions on glass-ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate dental cements [J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med，2000,11(6):357-360. DOI：10.1023/a:1008929923531.
[6]	Frankenberger R, García-Godoy F, Lohbauer U，et al. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I：in vitro investigations [J]. Am J Dent，2005,18(1):23-27.
[7]	Leinfelder KF. Glass ionomers：Current clinical developments [J]. J Am Dent Assoc，1993,124(9):62-64. DOI：10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0180.
[8]	Nicholson JW, Sidhu SK, Czarnecka B. Enhancing the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer dental cements：A review [J]. Materials（Basel），2020,13(11):2510. DOI：10.3390/ma13112510.
[9]	Kampanas NS, Antoniadou M. Glass ionomer cements for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in the geriatric patient [J]. J Funct Biomater，2018,9(3):42. DOI：10.3390/jfb9030042.
[10]	Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials？—Properties，limitations and future trends [J]. Materials，2009,3(1):76-96. DOI：10.3390/ma3010076.
[11]	Sidhu SK. Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials：A sticky subject？[J]. Aust Dent J，2011,56(Suppl 1):23-30. DOI：10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01293.x.
[12]	McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials [J]. Quintessence Int，1994,25(9):587-589.
[13]	Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement [J]. Br Dent J，1972,132(4):133-135. DOI：10.1038/sj.bdj.4802810.
[14]	Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements：A review [J]. Biomaterials，1998,19(6):485-494. DOI：10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00128-2.
[15]	de Barra E, Hill RG. Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements. Part Ⅲ：Influence of fluorite content [J]. Biomaterials，2000,21(6):563-569. DOI：10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00215-x.
[16]	Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect [J]. Biomaterials，1998,19(6):503-508. DOI：10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00130-0.
[17]	Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Brant P，et al. Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 7. The physical properties of current materials [J]. J Dent，1984,12(3):231-240. DOI：10.1016/0300-5712(84)90067-8.
[18]	Ching HS, Luddin N, Kannan TP，et al. Modification of glass ionomer cements on their physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent，2018,30(6):557-571. DOI：10.1111/jerd.12413.
[19]	唐卫东，陈敏，唐立. 玻璃离子水门汀在不同粉液比条件下的氟释放[J]. 大连轻工业学院学报，2001,20(4):242-244. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-1404.2001.04.003.
[20]	Wan Jusoh WN, Matori KA, Mohd Zaid MH，et al. Incorporation of hydroxyapatite into glass ionomer cement （GIC） formulated based on alumino-silicate-fluoride glass ceramics from waste materials [J]. Materials （Basel），2021,14(4):954. DOI：10.3390/ma14040954.
[21]	Wang Y, Darvell BW. Hertzian load-bearing capacity of a ceramic-reinforced glass ionomer cement stored wet and dry [J]. Dent Mater，2009,25(8):952-955. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.006.
[22]	Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Movasaghi Z，et al. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids，nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties [J]. Dent Mater，2008,24(10):1381-1390. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.008.
[23]	Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS，et al. Modifications in glass ionomer cements：Nano-sized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics [J]. Int J Mol Sci，2016,17(7):1134. DOI：10.3390/ijms17071134.
[24]	Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Clare A，et al. Toughening of dental glass ionomer cements with reactive glass fibres [J]. Biomaterials，2004,25(22):5217-5225. DOI：10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.027.
[25]	Tanaka CB, Ershad F, Ellakwa A，et al. Fiber reinforcement of a resin modified glass ionomer cement [J]. Dent Mater，2020,36(12):1516-1523. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.003.
[26]	Moshaverinia A, Roohpour N, Rehman IU. Synthesis and characterization of a novel fast-set proline-derivative-containing glass ionomer cement with enhanced mechanical properties [J]. Acta Biomater，2009,5(1):498-507. DOI：10.1016/j.actbio.2008.06.011.
[27]	Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers：From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer [J]. Dent Res J（Isfahan），2013,10(4):411-420. DOI：10.4103/1735-3327.118464.
[28]	崔恺，陈吉华，赵三军. 玻璃离子水门汀的研究进展[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志，2008,18(11):644-647.
[29]	Tyas MJ. Milestones in adhesion：Glass-ionomer cements [J]. J Adhes Dent，2003,5(4):259-266.
[30]	Falsafi A, Mitra SB, Oxman JD，et al. Mechanisms of setting reactions and interfacial behavior of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer [J]. Dent Mater，2014,30(6):632-643. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.025.
[31]	Mickenautsch S, Mount G, Yengopal V. Therapeutic effect of glass-ionomers：An overview of evidence [J]. Aust Dent J，2011,56(1):10-15. DOI：10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01304.x.
[32]	Bollen AM, Huang G, King G，et al. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 1：Ability to complete treatment [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop，2003,124(5):496-501. DOI：10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00576-6.
[33]	Seghi RR, Leyva Del Rio D. Biomaterials：Ceramic and adhesive technologies [J]. Dent Clin North Am，2019,63(2):233-248. DOI：10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.005.
[34]	de Angelis F, D′arcangelo C, Buonvivere M，et al. Shear bond strength of glass ionomer and resin-based cements to different types of zirconia [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent，2020,32(8):806-814. DOI：10.1111/jerd.12638.
[35]	Mandall NA, Hickman J, Macfarlane TV，et al. Adhesives for fixed orthodontic brackets [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev，2018,4(4):CD002282. DOI：10.1002/14651858.CD002282.pub2.
[36]	Benson PE, Alexander-Abt J, Cotter S，et al. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding：A multicenter，single-blind，randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop，2019,155(1):10-18. DOI：10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.005.
[37]	Fricker JP. Therapeutic properties of glass-ionomer cements：Their application to orthodontic treatment [J]. Aust Dent J，2022,67(1):12-20. DOI：10.1111/adj.12888.
[38]	Berg JH. Glass ionomer cements [J]. Pediatr Dent，2002,24(5):430-438.
[39]	Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB，et al. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in ClassⅡ restorations in primary teeth：A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent，2018,73:1-13. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.004.
[40]	王瑾，程为庄. 玻璃离子水门汀的研究进展[J]. 北京生物医学工程，2005,24(2):139-142. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1002-3208.2005.02.016.
[41]	劳嘉成. 树脂与玻璃离子水门汀充填治疗学龄前儿童乳牙龋蚀的效果[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志，2023,33(5):110-112. DOI：10.16458/j.cnki.1007-0893.2023.05.035.
[42]	陈婉璐，李万蒙，李亚琼，等. 玻璃离子水门汀在老年根面龋患者修复中的应用及对龈沟液炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志，2023,43(2):358-361. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2022.02.029.
[43]	尹良胜，池韬，钟素苗. 相邻后牙邻面龋的诊治及其树脂充填效果评价的临床研究[J]. 四川医学，2019,40(5):487-490. DOI：10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2019.05.12.
[44]	李旭. 银粉玻璃离子水门汀填充修复在恒磨牙邻面龋患者中的应用[J]. 医药论坛杂志，2020,41(8):103-106. DOI：CNKI:SUN:HYYX.0.2020-08-028.
[45]	Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations [J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent，2016,17(3):227-233.
[46]	Francisconi LF, Scaffa PM, de Barros VR，et al. Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions [J]. J Appl Oral Sci，2009,17(5):364-369. DOI：10.1590/s1678-77572009000500003.
[47]	Schwendicke F, Müller A, Seifert T，et al. Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions：Survival，restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years [J]. J Dent，2021,110:103689. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103689.
[48]	马健，邵强，于毅. 不同龈下楔状缺损充填材料对牙龈卟啉单胞菌生物膜形成的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学，2020,29(4):375-379. DOI：10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.008.
[49]	Frencken JE, Leal SC, Navarro MF. Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment（ART） approach：A comprehensive overview [J]. Clin Oral Investig，2012,16(5):1337-1346. DOI：10.1007/s00784-012-0783-4.
[50]	Ruengrungsom C, Palamara JEA, Burrow MF. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions：A systematic review [J]. J Dent，2018,78:1-21. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.008.
[51]	Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment （ART） approach for the management of dental caries [J]. Quintessence Int，2002,33(6):427-432.
[52]	da Mata C, Mckenna G, Anweigi L，et al. An RCT of atraumatic restorative treatment for older adults：5 year results [J]. J Dent，2019,83:95-99. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.003.
[53]	Ratnayake J, Veerasamy A, Ahmed H，et al. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of a chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement （GIC-CHX） restoration placed using the atraumatic restorative treatment （ART） technique [J]. Materials （Basel），2022,15(14):5044. DOI：10.3390/ma15145044.
[54]	Chailert O, Banomyong D, Vongphan N，et al. Internal adaptation of resin composite restorations with different thicknesses of glass ionomer cement lining [J]. J Investig Clin Dent，2018,9(2):e12308. DOI：10.1111/jicd.12308.
[55]	Ribeiro APD, Sacono NT, Soares DG，et al. Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities [J]. Clin Oral Investig，2020,24(5):1739-1748. DOI：10.1007/s00784-019-03035-3.
[56]	Mount GJ. Esthetics with glass-ionomer cements and the "sandwich" technique [J]. Quintessence Int，1990,21(2):93-101.
[57]	南晓红，寇继寅，李茹. 玻璃离子水门汀的应用及发展[J]. 口腔医学，2007,27(6):323-325. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-9872.2007.06.016.
[58]	Manihani AKDS, Mulay S, Beri L，et al. Effect of total-etch and self-etch adhesives on the bond strength of composite to glass-ionomer cement/resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in the sandwich technique—A systematic review [J]. Dent Res J （Isfahan），2021,18:72. DOI：10.4103/1735-3327.326645.
[59]	Sikka N, Brizuela M. Glass Ionomer Cement [M]. Treasure Island （FL）：StatPearls，2023.
[60]	Hassani Katehsari V, Niedermeier W. Solubility of dental core build-up materials in electric fields [J]. J Dent Sci，2019,14(4):346-351. DOI：10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.005.
[61]	Souza JCM, Fernandes V, Correia A，et al. Surface modification of glass fiber-reinforced composite posts to enhance their bond strength to resin-matrix cements：An integrative review [J]. Clin Oral Investig，2022,26(1):95-107. DOI：10.1007/s00784-021-04221-y.
[62]	Li XJ, Zhao SJ, Niu LN，et al. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals [J]. J Dent，2014,42(1):75-83. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.017.
[63]	刘莹，王富，赵三军，等. 3种粘结材料对粘结纤维桩的临床疗效观察[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志，2016,26(2):110-114. DOI：10.15956/j.cnki.chin.j.conserv.dent.2016.02.012.
[64]	Kantovitz KR, Pascon FM, Nociti FH Jr，et al. Inhibition of enamel mineral loss by fissure sealant：An in situ study [J]. J Dent，2013,41(1):42-50. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.015.
[65]	Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S, Bezerra AC，et al. Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth：A meta analysis [J]. J Oral Sci，2009,51(3):373-382. DOI：10.2334/josnusd.51.373.
[66]	Markovic D, Peric T, Petrovic B. Glass-ionomer fissure sealants：Clinical observations up to 13 years [J]. J Dent，2018,79:85-89. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.007.
[67]	李一涵，王菲，吴珺华. 影响玻璃离子水门汀粘接强度的因素[J]. 广东牙病防治，2015,23(1):48-51. DOI：CNKI:SUN:GDYB.0.2015-01-019.
[68]	胡菁颖，李莉，周倩妹，等. 不同调拌板对玻璃离子水门汀物理性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版），2019,51(5):964-967. DOI：10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2019.05.029.
[69]	叶慧铭，朱曼群，林桂珍，等. 玻璃离子水门汀粘固前牙全冠的调拌方法探讨[J]. 广东牙病防治，2012,20(8):441-442. DOI：CNKI:SUN:GDYB.0.2012-08-014.
[70]	邱韬，陈欣蕾，黄娟，等. 调拌方式对玻璃离子水门汀充填体抗压强度的影响[J]. 中国医药导报，2019,16(24):111-114. DOI：CNKI:SUN:YYCY.0.2019-24-030.
[71]	邱韬，毛渤淳，张家愚，等. 调拌方式对玻璃离子水门汀充填体边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 中国医药导报，2019,16(33):100-102+115. DOI：CNKI:SUN:YYCY.0.2019-33-025.
[72]	Mar B, Ekambaram M, Li KC，et al. The influence of saliva and blood contamination on bonding between resin-modified glass ionomer cements and resin composite [J]. Oper Dent，2023,48(2):218-225. DOI：10.2341/21-173-L.
[73]	Shimazu K, Karibe H, Oguchi R，et al. Influence of artificial saliva contamination on adhesion in class V restorations [J]. Dent Mater J，2020,39(3):429-434. DOI：10.4012/dmj.2019-032.
[74]	赵信义. 口腔材料学[M]. 6版. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2020:66-67.
[75]	黄梓濡，邹华，侯沐明，等. 粉液比例对树脂加强型玻璃离子托槽粘接的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志（电子版），2015,9(4):301-304. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.04.008.
[76]	Millett DT, Cattanach D, Mcfadzean R，et al. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding [J]. Angle Orthod，1999,69(1):58-63. DOI：10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0058:LEOACA>2.3.CO;2.
[77]	Hao Y, Huang X, Zhou X，et al. Influence of dental prosthesis and restorative materials interface on oral biofilms [J]. Int J Mol Sci，2018,19(10):3157. DOI：10.3390/ijms19103157.
[78]	Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y，et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite，enamel and dentin [J]. Biomaterials，2003,24(11):1861-1867. DOI：10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00575-6.
[79]	Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y，et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces [J]. J Dent Res，2000,79(2):709-714. DOI：10.1177/00220345000790020301.
[80]	Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S，et al. Chemical interaction of glycero-phosphate dimethacrylate（GPDM） with hydroxyapatite and dentin [J]. Dent Mater，2018,34(7):1072-1081. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.003.
[81]	Hasan AMHR, Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement （ "glass carbomer^TM" ） compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements [J]. J Appl Oral Sci，2019,27:e2018 0230. DOI：10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0230.
[82]	Patil SS, Kontham UR, Kontham RK，et al. Fluoride release and fluoride-recharging ability of three different sealants [J]. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent，2020,38(3):247-252. DOI：10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_345_19.
[83]	Bueno LS, Borges AFS, Navarro MFL，et al. Determination of chemical species of fluoride during uptake mechanism of glass-ionomer cements with NMR spectroscopy [J]. Dent Mater，2021,37(7):1176-1182. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2021.04.011.
[84]	Burgess JO, Vaghela PM. Silver diamine fluoride：A successful anticarious solution with limits [J]. Adv Dent Res，2018,29(1):131-134. DOI：10.1177/0022034517740123.
[85]	González-Cabezas C, Fernández CE. Recent advances in remineralization therapies for caries lesions [J]. Adv Dent Res，2018,29(1):55-59. DOI：10.1177/0022034517740124.
[86]	Ten Cate JM, Buzalaf MAR. Fluoride mode of action：Once there was an observant dentist [J]. J Dent Res，2019,98(7):725-730. DOI：10.1177/0022034519831604.
[87]	Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM，et al. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev，2019,3(3):CD007868. DOI：10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub3.
[88]	Tian KV, Chass GA, Di Tommaso D. Simulations reveal the role of composition into the atomic-level flexibility of bioactive glass cements [J]. Phys Chem Chem Phys，2016,18(2):837-845. DOI：10.1039/c5cp05650k.
[89]	Pedone A, Chen X, Hill RG，et al. Molecular Dynamics Investigation of Halide-Containing Phospho-Silicate Bioactive Glasses [J]. J Phys Chem B，2018,122(11):2940-2948. DOI：10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b00547.
[90]	Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP，et al. Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials：A review and a proposal for classification [J]. Materials（Basel），2020,13(10):2313. DOI：10.3390/ma13102313.
[91]	Dasgupta S, Saraswathi MV, Somayaji K，et al. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials：An in vitro study [J]. J Conserv Dent，2018,21(6):622-626. DOI：10.4103/JCD.JCD_338_18.
[92]	Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials [J]. Dent Mater J，2018,37(2):293-300. DOI：10.4012/dmj.2017-161.
[93]	Hurle K, Oliveira JM, Reis RL，et al. Ion-doped brushite cements for bone regeneration [J]. Acta Biomater，2021,123:51-71. DOI：10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.004.
[94]	Bermúdez-Reyes B, Del Refugio Lara-Banda M, Reyes-Zarate E，et al. Effect on growth and osteoblast mineralization of hydroxyapatite-zirconia （HA-ZrO₂） obtained by a new low temperature system [J]. Biomed Mater，2018,13(3):035001. DOI：10.1088/1748-605X/aaa3a4.
[95]	Van Duinen RN, Davidson CL, De Gee AJ，et al. In situ transformation of glass-ionomer into an enamel-like material [J]. Am J Dent，2004,17(4):223-227.
[96]	De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CWJ, Ladik I，et al. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements：Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility[J]. Dent Mater，2017,33(4):e186-e203. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.007.
[97]	Bossù M, Saccucci M, Salucci A，et al. Enamel remineralization and repair results of Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite toothpaste on deciduous teeth：An effective option to fluoride toothpaste [J]. J Nanobiotechnology，2019,17(1):17. DOI：10.1186/s12951-019-0454-6.
[98]	Karimi M, Hesaraki S, Alizadeh M，et al. Effect of synthetic amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles on the physicochemical and biological properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl，2019,98:227-240. DOI：10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.129.
[99]	Kheur M, Kantharia N, Lakha T，et al. Correction To：Evaluation of mechanical and adhesion properties of glass ionomer cement incorporating nano-sized hydroxyapatite particles[J]. Odontology，2020,108(1):152. DOI：10.1007/s10266-019-00434-6.
[100]	Kunte S, Shah SB, Patil S，et al. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and diametral tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and a glass hybrid glass ionomer cement [J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent，2022,15(4):398-401. DOI：10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2407.
[101]	Kheur M, Kantharia N, Lakha T，et al. Evaluation of mechanical and adhesion properties of glass ionomer cement incorporating nano-sized hydroxyapatite particles [J]. Odontology，2020,108(1):66-73. DOI：10.1007/s10266-019-00427-5.
[102]	Lee JJ, Lee YK, Choi BJ，et al. Physical properties of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement modified with micro and nano-hydroxyapatite [J]. J Nanosci Nanotechnol，2010,10(8):5270-5276. DOI：10.1166/jnn.2010.2422.
[103]	Sun L, Yan Z, Duan Y，et al. Improvement of the mechanical，tribological and antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements by fluorinated graphene [J]. Dent Mater，2018,34(6):e115-e127. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.006.
[104]	Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Tortopidis D，et al. Effect of a calcium chloride solution treatment on physical and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements [J]. Odontology，2018,106(4):429-438. DOI：10.1007/s10266-018-0338-5.
[105]	Perera D, Yu SCH, Zeng H，et al. Acid resistance of glass ionomer cement restorative materials[J]. Bioengineering（Basel），2020,7(4):150. DOI：10.3390/bioengineering7040150.
[106]	Mustafa R, Alshali RZ, Silikas N. The effect of desiccation on water sorption，solubility and hygroscopic volumetric expansion of dentine replacement materials [J]. Dent Mater，2018,34(8):e205-e213. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.012.
[107]	Pitel ML. Long-term performance of glass-hybrid restorations in permanent posterior teeth [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent，2021,42(Suppl 1):6-9.
[108]	Scott JM, Mahoney EK. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition：Is glass ionomer cement the material of choice？[J]. N Z Dent J，2003,99(3):65-71.
[109]	Almuhaiza M. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry：A critical appraisal [J]. J Contemp Dent Pract，2016,17(4):331-336. DOI：10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1850.
[110]	Oz FD, Meral E, Ergin E，et al. One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases：A randomized，clinical trial [J]. J Appl Oral Sci，2020,28:e20200311. DOI：10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0311.
[111]	Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E，et al. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system [J]. Oper Dent，2015,40(2):134-143. DOI：10.2341/13-239-C.
[112]	Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E，et al. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system：A 6-year evaluation [J]. Clin Oral Investig，2017,21(7):2335-2343. DOI：10.1007/s00784-016-2028-4.
[113]	Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E，et al. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth [J]. Am J Dent，2005,18(3):198-211.
[114]	Bijle MN, Ekambaram M, Lo ECM，et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of arginine-containing glass ionomer cements [J]. Dent Mater，2020,36(9):1226-1240. DOI：10.1016/j.dental.2020.05.012.
[115]	Hafshejani TM, Zamanian A, Venugopal JR，et al. Antibacterial glass-ionomer cement restorative materials：A critical review on the current status of extended release formulations [J]. J Control Release，2017,262:317-328. DOI：10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.041.
[116]	朱可石，任利玲. 纳米填料改性玻璃离子水门汀的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究，2022,38(1):13-16. DOI：10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.01.003.
[117]	Zhu K, Zheng L, Xing J，et al. Mechanical，antibacterial，biocompatible and microleakage evaluation of glass ionomer cement modified by nanohydroxyapatite/polyhexamethylene biguanide [J]. Dent Mater J，2022,41(2):197-208. DOI：10.4012/dmj.2021-096.
[118]	张宜爽，陶地豪，郭安迪，等. 玻璃离子水门汀天然抗菌成分研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治，2022,30(10):751-756. DOI：10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.10.011.
[119]	Yudovin-Farber I, Beyth N, Nyska A，et al. Surface characterization and biocompatibility of restorative resin containing nanoparticles [J]. Biomacromolecules，2008,9(11):3044-3050. DOI：10.1021/bm8004897.
[120]	Saghir A, Rehman T, Irum B，et al. 12 Month′s assessment of clinical efficacy of resin modified glass ionomer cement and flowable composites in restoration of non-carious cervical lesions，a randomized clinical trial [J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad，2023,35(1):7-10. DOI：10.55519/JAMC-01-10780.
[121]	Uzel I, Gurlek C, Kuter B，et al. Caries-preventive effect and retention of glass-ionomer and resin-based sealants：A randomized clinical comparative evaluation [J]. Biomed Res Int，2022:7205692. DOI：10.1155/2022/7205692.
[122]	Chadwick BL, Evans DJ. Restoration of classⅡ cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements：A systematic review of the literature [J]. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent，2007,8(1):14-21. DOI：10.1007/BF03262565.
[123]	巴晓兰，程为庄. 改性玻璃离子水门汀的研究进展[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志，2005,22(4):857-859. DOI：10.3321/j.issn:1001-5515.2005.04.049.

分类	主要特点	临床应用	代表产品
Ⅰ型	粘接性能良好；流动性好，薄膜厚度小；粘接牙面无须酸蚀	粘固、正畸附件粘接	富士Ⅰ（GC，日本）
			Rely Luting树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			Rely Luting 2树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			Ketac Cem Easymix速调灵（3M，美国）
			CX粘接型玻璃离子水门汀（Shofu，日本）
			美益汀粘接型玻璃离子水门汀（上海沪鸽医疗器械有限公司）
Ⅱ型	氟释放性：防龋抑龋作用；有一定机械强度；无聚合收缩	乳牙窝洞充填、恒牙非承力区充填、恒牙暂时充填、桩核制作、ART技术、窝沟封闭、夹层修复技术等	富士Ⅱ（GC，日本）
			Ketac Molar玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			Ketac Universal玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			FX-Ⅱ充填型玻璃离子水门汀（Shofu，日本）
			美益汀充填型玻璃离子水门汀（上海沪鸽医疗器械有限公司）
Ⅲ型	生物相容性：释放吸收生物活性离子，对牙髓刺激性小	洞衬垫底、窝沟封闭	富士Ⅶ（GC，日本）
Ⅲ型	生物相容性：释放吸收生物活性离子，对牙髓刺激性小	洞衬垫底、窝沟封闭	Vitrebond光固化垫底用玻璃离子（3M，美国）

分类	主要特点	临床应用	代表产品
Ⅰ型	粘接性能良好；流动性好，薄膜厚度小；粘接牙面无须酸蚀	粘固、正畸附件粘接	富士Ⅰ（GC，日本）
			Rely Luting树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			Rely Luting 2树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			Ketac Cem Easymix速调灵（3M，美国）
			CX粘接型玻璃离子水门汀（Shofu，日本）
			美益汀粘接型玻璃离子水门汀（上海沪鸽医疗器械有限公司）
Ⅱ型	氟释放性：防龋抑龋作用；有一定机械强度；无聚合收缩	乳牙窝洞充填、恒牙非承力区充填、恒牙暂时充填、桩核制作、ART技术、窝沟封闭、夹层修复技术等	富士Ⅱ（GC，日本）
			Ketac Molar玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			Ketac Universal玻璃离子水门汀（3M，美国）
			FX-Ⅱ充填型玻璃离子水门汀（Shofu，日本）
			美益汀充填型玻璃离子水门汀（上海沪鸽医疗器械有限公司）
Ⅲ型	生物相容性：释放吸收生物活性离子，对牙髓刺激性小	洞衬垫底、窝沟封闭	富士Ⅶ（GC，日本）
Ⅲ型	生物相容性：释放吸收生物活性离子，对牙髓刺激性小	洞衬垫底、窝沟封闭	Vitrebond光固化垫底用玻璃离子（3M，美国）

材料种类	性能	用途
传统GIC	氟化物释放性能最佳；细胞毒性低；美学性能差	适用于易发龋患且对美学性能需求小者的牙齿修复，如老年人根面龋的修复
树脂改性GIC	粘接性能好；溶解度降低；美学性能较好；机械性能提高；对水分的早期敏感性降低；牙髓刺激性小	受力不大的恒牙Ⅲ、V类洞和楔状缺损的永久性充填修复；乳牙所有窝洞的充填修复；恒牙所有窝洞的暂时性或者短期充填修复
复合树脂	光引发聚合固化；力学性能好，质地坚韧不易折断；耐磨耗性能好；粘接性能差，需与粘接剂配合应用；与牙体线胀系数差距大，易发生微渗漏；有一定细胞毒性；技术敏感性高	较小Ⅲ、V类洞修复；后牙中等至较大的Ⅰ、Ⅱ类洞缺损的修复，包括近远中洞的修复，特别是涉及咬合面尖、嵴的缺损；充填窝洞倒凹；用于修复深窝洞时，应当先行垫底保护牙髓
树脂水门汀	粘接性能好；机械性能佳；有细胞毒性与牙髓刺激性	粘接修复单冠及固定桥；瓷贴面及嵌体的粘固；纤维桩修复

材料种类	性能	用途
传统GIC	氟化物释放性能最佳；细胞毒性低；美学性能差	适用于易发龋患且对美学性能需求小者的牙齿修复，如老年人根面龋的修复
树脂改性GIC	粘接性能好；溶解度降低；美学性能较好；机械性能提高；对水分的早期敏感性降低；牙髓刺激性小	受力不大的恒牙Ⅲ、V类洞和楔状缺损的永久性充填修复；乳牙所有窝洞的充填修复；恒牙所有窝洞的暂时性或者短期充填修复
复合树脂	光引发聚合固化；力学性能好，质地坚韧不易折断；耐磨耗性能好；粘接性能差，需与粘接剂配合应用；与牙体线胀系数差距大，易发生微渗漏；有一定细胞毒性；技术敏感性高	较小Ⅲ、V类洞修复；后牙中等至较大的Ⅰ、Ⅱ类洞缺损的修复，包括近远中洞的修复，特别是涉及咬合面尖、嵴的缺损；充填窝洞倒凹；用于修复深窝洞时，应当先行垫底保护牙髓
树脂水门汀	粘接性能好；机械性能佳；有细胞毒性与牙髓刺激性	粘接修复单冠及固定桥；瓷贴面及嵌体的粘固；纤维桩修复

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export