Comparison of the bond strength of selective laser melting and cast Cobalt-Chromium alloys to porcelain

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2017.04.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the bond strength of selective laser melting (SLM) and cast Cobalt-Chromium (Co-Cr) alloys to porcelain.

Methods

Co-Cr alloy specimens (25 mm × 3 mm × 0.5 mm) were prepared using either a cast or CAD/CAM SLM methods. A 8 mm × 3 mm × 1.1 mm ceramic layer was fused to the central portion (8 mm × 3 mm) of the surface of the metal specimens. The bond strengths of the metal-ceramic were tested using a three-point bending test according to the ISO 9693 standard. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy were used to determine the morphology, elemental composition, failure types, and area fraction of adherence porcelain. Metallographic microscope was used to observe the metallurgical structure of alloy specimens. The data of metal ceramic bond strength and area fraction of adherence porcelain were analyzed using independent sample t-test (α= 0.05) .

Results

The metal-ceramic bond strength of SLM and cast Co-Cr alloy were (32.41 ± 3.21) and (32.93 ± 4.33) MPa, respectively. No statistical difference was found between two groups (t= 0.095, P= 0.163) . After three-point bending test a mixture of adhesive and cohesive failure types was observed in all specimens. The area fraction of adherence porcelain of SLM and cast Co-Cr alloy was (79.67 ± 3.92) and (62.73 ± 7.34) , respectively. Significant differences were found between two groups (t=-6.46, P< 0.001) , suggesting that the SLM alloy surface had larger area of residual ceramic.

Conclusions

No difference was found in the metal-ceramic bond strength between SLM and cast Co-Cr alloy. In terms of the porcelain-bonding area, SLM alloys even had a greater advantage than cast alloys.

Key words: Selective laser melting, Cobalt-Chromium alloy, Metal-ceramic bond strength

Quan Luo, Jing Xia, Jieyin Li, Shiyao Lin, Yan Qu, Jiantao Ye, Juankun Liao. Comparison of the bond strength of selective laser melting and cast Cobalt-Chromium alloys to porcelain[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(04): 211-217.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2017.04.004

https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2017/V11/I04/211

Figures/Tables 7

References 22

[1]	付立定，史玉升.不锈钢粉末选择性激光熔化直接制造金属零件研究[D].武汉：华中科技大学，2008.
[2]	周刚，蔡道生，史玉升，等.金属粉末熔化快速成型技术的研究进展[J].航空制造技术，2009(3):43-46.
[3]	Kruth JP, Froyen L, Vaerenbergh JV，et al. Selective laser melting of iron-based powder[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology，2004，149(3):616-622.
[4]	Over C, Meiners W, Wissenbach K，et al. Selective laser melting：a new approach for the direct manufacturing of metal parts and tools[R]. 1st International Conferenceon Laser Assisted Net Shape Engineering，Germany：Frankfurt，2001.
[5]	杨永强，吴伟辉，来克娴，等.金属零件选区激光熔化直接快速成形工艺及最新进展[J].航空制造技术杂志，2006(2):73-76.
[6]	ISO 9693（E）. Metal-Ceramic Dental Restorative Systems[S]. 2nded. Switzerland：International Organization for Standardization，1999.
[7]	Oliveira de Vasconcellos LG, Silva LH, Reis de Vasconcellos LM，et al. Effect of airbone-particle abrasion and mechanic-thermal cycling on the flexural strength of glass ceramic fused to gold or cobalt-chromium alloy[J]. J Prosthodont，2011，20(7):553-560.
[8]	Ringle RD, Macker JR Jr, Fairhurst CW. An x-ray spectrometric technique for measuring porcelain-metal adherence[J]. J Dent Res，1983，62(8):933-936.
[9]	Lombardo GH, Nishioka RS, Souza RO，et al. Influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramics fused to cobalt-chromium[J]. J Prosthodont，2009，19(2):103-111.
[10]	Uusalo EK, Lassila VP, Yli-Urpo AU. Bonding of dental porcelain to ceramic-metal alloys[J]. J Prosthet Dent，1987，57(1):26-29.
[11]	Sadeq A, Cai Z, Woody RD，et al. Effects of interfacial variables on ceramic adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2013，90(1):10-17.
[12]	Yao L, Peng C, Wu J. Wettability and bond strength between leucite-reinforced dental porcelain sand Co-Cr alloy[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2013，110(6):515-520.
[13]	Jochen DG, Caputo AA, Matyas J. Effect of opaque porcelain application on strength of bond to silver-palladium alloys[J]. J Prosthet Dent，1990，63(4):414-418.
[14]	Bae EJ, Kim JH, Kim WC，et al. Bond and fracture strength of metal-ceramic restorations formed by selective laser sintering[J]. J Adv Prosthodont，2014，6(4):266-271.
[15]	Xiang N, Xin XZ, Chen J，et al. Metal-ceramic bond strength of Co-Cr alloy fabricated by selective laser melting[J]. J Dent，2012，40(6):453-457.
[16]	Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A，et al. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain[J]. Dent Mater，2008，24(10):1400-1404.
[17]	Rathi S, Parkash H, Chittaranjan B，et al. Oxidation heat treatment affecting metal-ceramic bonding[J]. Indian J Dent Res，2011，22(6):877-878.
[18]	Lim HP, Kim JH, Lee KM，et al. Fracture load of titanium crowns coated with gold or titanium nitride and bonded to low-fusing porcelain[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2011，105(3):164-170.
[19]	Papazoglou E, Brantley WA. Porcelain adherence vs force to failure for palladium-gallium alloys：a critique of metal-ceramic bond testing[J]. Dental Mater，1998，14(2):112-119.
[20]	李勇，张飚，黄奇容，等.选择性激光熔融技术成形牙科钴铬合金性能的初步研究[J].口腔医学研究，2012，28(8):815-817,820.
[21]	Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S, Eliades G，et al. Selective Laser Melting Technique of Co-Cr Dental Alloys：A Review of Structure and Properties and Comparative Analysis with Other Available Techniques[J]. J Prosthodont，2015，24(4):303-312.
[22]	Qiu J, Yu WQ, Zhang FQ，et al. Corrosion behavior and surface analysis of a Co-Cr and two Ni-Cr dental alloys before and after simulated porcelain firing[J]. Eur J Oral Sci，2011，119(1):93-101.

组别	试件数（个）	结合强度（MPa，±s）	t值	P值
铸造组	10	32.93 ± 4.33	0.095	0.163
SLM组	10	32.41 ± 3.21	?	?

组别	试件数（个）	结合强度（MPa，±s）	t值	P值
铸造组	10	32.93 ± 4.33	0.095	0.163
SLM组	10	32.41 ± 3.21	?	?

组别	试件数（个）	AFAP(±s)	t值	P值
铸造组	10	62.73 ± 7.34^a	0.095	0.163
SLM组	10	79.67 ± 3.92^b	?	?

组别	试件数（个）	AFAP(±s)	t值	P值
铸造组	10	62.73 ± 7.34^a	0.095	0.163
SLM组	10	79.67 ± 3.92^b	?	?

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export