Home  About misconduct   中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition) ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (03): 280-287. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2011.03.008

• Original Articles • Previous Articles    

Effect of different polishing and glazing techniques on the surface roughness of dental ceramic surface

Qiao-ying LAN1, Jia-xing YANG1, Yi YUAN1, Feng QIN1,()   

  1. 1.Guanghua School of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatological Research, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055,China
  • Received:2010-11-16 Online:2011-06-01 Published:2025-02-24
  • Contact: Feng QIN

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effect of different polishing and glazing techniques on the surface roughness of feldspathic ceramic via multiple evaluation parameters.

Methods

100 disc-shaped ceramic specimens (Vita VMK 95, 5.0 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in thickness)were randomly divided into five groups (n=20), in which porcelain surfaces were ground sequentially with abrasive sandpapers to 220#, 320#, 600#, 800# and 1200# under water-cooling condition, respectively.Each group then divided into two subgroups (n=10) by means of glazing techniques, namely the overglazing group and the autoglazing group.The surface roughness parameters (including Ra, Rz, Rp and RSm) of the same specimen were measured by a profilometer both before and after glazing.And the surface characteristics of the representative specimen from each group were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results

The specimens ground 220# sandpapers displayed the highest Ra value after glazing,(0.532±0.109)μm in the overglazing group and (0.552±0.123)μm in the autoglazing group; while those sequentially polished to 1200# sandpapers obtained the lowest Ra value,(0.201±0.050)μm in the overglazing group and (0.126±0.016)μm in the autoglazing group.Both autoglazing and overglazing techniques could produce smooth ceramic surface.

Conclusion

Different polishing and glazing techniques have significant effects on the surface roughness of dental ceramic.

Key words: Dental porcelain, Polishing, Glazing, Surface roughness

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87330582 E-mail: zhkqyxyj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd