Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06): 430-435. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2023.06.010

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The clinical effect of "sticky bone" mixed with concentrated growth factor on patients with horizontal bone augmentation

Zhenjiang Gong, Shouyi Wang, Chao Yao, Yongzhi Pang, Jing Cui()   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Central Laboratory of Jinan Stamotological Hospital, Jinan Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250001, China
  • Received:2023-08-26 Online:2023-12-01 Published:2023-12-11
  • Contact: Jing Cui
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Plan of Jinan Health Commission(2021-2-114)

Abstract:

Objective

To study the effectiveness of sticky bone mixed with concentrated growth factor (CGF) on bone augmentation in patients with horizontal ridge defect.

Methods

A total of 40 patients with dentition defect (one tooth loss) who were treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jinan Stomatological Hospital from September 2021 to February 2023 were included in the study. Participants were randomly divided into the control group receiving guided bone regeneration (GBR) with Bio-Oss bone substitute, and the experimental group receiving GBR with sticky bone mixed with CGF. The success rate of osseointegration, alveolar bone width, gained bone width at 6 months after surgery, operation time and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The success rate of osseointegration in both groups was 100%. The alveolar bone width of the experimental group and the control group at 6 months after surgery was (8.3 ± 0.8) mm and (7.1 ± 1.0) mm, respectively, both of which was larger than that before surgery [ (3.6 ± 0.6) mm and (3.8 ± 0.8) mm], and the difference was statistically significant (te = 22.13, tc = 11.99, P<0.001). The alveolar bone width (t2) and gained bone width (t2-t0) in the experimental group were (8.3 ± 0.8) mm and (4.7 ± 0.7) mm, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group [ (7.1 ± 1.0) mm and (3.3 ± 0.8) mm], and the difference was statistically significant (tt2 = -4.406, tt2-t0 = 5.978, P<0.001). The operation time of bone augmentation in the experimental group [ (6.5 ± 1.1) min] was significantly lower than that in the control group [ (8.1 ± 1.3) min] (t = 4.196, P<0.001). No serious postoperative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Compared with the GBR technique using Bio-Oss bone substitute, the GBR technique using sticky bone mixed with CGF had better outcome in horizontal bone augmentation. However, further studies on its long-term effect are needed.

Key words: Bone augmentation, Guided bone regeneration, Sticky bone, Concentrated growth factor

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87330582 E-mail: zhkqyxyj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd