Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of six universal adhesives and sandblasting on the bond strength and durability between polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and composite resin under different storage conditions.
Methods A PEEK disk was cut into twelve cube specimens with the side length of 2 cm. Six specimens were sandblasted with alumina. The six universal adhesives are: Tetric N-Bond Universal (TNU) , Single Bond Universal (SBU) , DX.BOND UNI (DXB) , Selective Etch Bond (SEB) , Gluma Bond Universal (GBU) and Prime & Bond Universal (PBU) . The experiment was divided into seven groups with four sandblasted surfaces and four unsandblasted surfaces in each group. Seven surface treatments were: no adhesive applied (control group) and six brands of universal adhesive (experimental groups: TNU group, SBU group, DXB group, SEB group, GBU group and PBU group) . After surface preparation, the flowable composite resin F00 was injected into a transparent mold on the specimen surface without pressure for light-curing. The shear bond strength (SBS) test was carried out after water storage (37 ℃, 24 h) and thermocycling (3000 times) . The photograph and fracture mode analysis were performed using Tele-macro mode of Shofu EyeSpecial C-Ⅳ dental camera. The data from SBS were analyzed by using Three-Way ANOVA (thermocycling, adhesive and sandblasting) , and Turkey (α = 0.05) .
Results After water storage, the highest bond strength was achieved by the TNU in the non-blasting group (9.92 ± 1.19) MPa and the sandblasting group (9.97 ± 1.03) MPa, respectively; After 3000 times thermocycling, the best bonding performance was achieved by PBU in the non-blasting group (6.75 ± 0.99) MPa and the sandblasting group (7.22 ± 1.30) MPa, respectively. The Three-Way ANOVA analysis indicated that the SBS was significantly affected by thermocycling (F = 3 045.429, P<0.001) , adhesive (F = 361.165, P<0.001) and sandblasting (F = 80.050, P<0.001) ; There was significant interaction between the three factors: thermocycling and adhesive (F = 155.724, P<0.001) , adhesive and sand blasting (F = 3.535, P = 0.002) , as well as thermocycling and sandblasting (F = 9.184, P = 0.003) . The interaction among thermocycling, adhesive and sand blasting was significantly different (F = 12.392, P<0.001) .
Conclusions (1) The bond strength of the universal adhesive between composite resin and PEEK was significantly improved by sandblasting after 37 ℃ water storage for 24 h; (2) The bond strength between composite resins and PEEK significantly decreased after thermocycling for 3000 times; (3) The bonding durability of PBU was superior to other universal adhesives in the present study.
Key words:
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK),
Universal adhesives,
Flowable composite resin,
Shear bond strength,
Sandblasting
Feifei Pang, Junjie Liu, Zihang Yu, Xiaojie Wu, Xinyu Zhang, Desong Zhan, Jiale Fu. Effect of different surface treatments on the bonding performance between polyetheretherketone and composite resin[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 74-81.