切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 378 -382. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2025.06.004

器械分离专栏·病例分析

保留根尖孔外分离器械根管治疗1例:9年随访
周广磊1,(), 吴俊杰1, 蔡梁婧1, 刘宸宇2   
  1. 1天津市滨海新区塘沽口腔医院,天津 300450
    2湖南中医药大学,长沙 410208
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-01 出版日期:2025-12-01
  • 通信作者: 周广磊

Retained instrument fragment beyond the apical foramen in root canal treatment: A 9-year follow-up case report

Guanglei Zhou1,(), Junjie Wu1, Liangjing Cai1, Chenyu Liu2   

  1. 1Tanggu Stomatological Hospital, Binhai New Area, Tianjin 300450, China
    2Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
  • Received:2025-08-01 Published:2025-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Guanglei Zhou
引用本文:

周广磊, 吴俊杰, 蔡梁婧, 刘宸宇. 保留根尖孔外分离器械根管治疗1例:9年随访[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 378-382.

Guanglei Zhou, Junjie Wu, Liangjing Cai, Chenyu Liu. Retained instrument fragment beyond the apical foramen in root canal treatment: A 9-year follow-up case report[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 378-382.

发生于根尖区的器械分离,尤其是当器械超出根尖孔,临床处置往往面临较大挑战。传统取出方法常需切除过多的根部牙本质,这不仅可能造成根管的穿孔和牙根折断等并发症,还可能影响患牙的长期预后。然而,对于在高质量根管治疗末期发生的此类器械分离病例,在严格评估适应证的前提下,保留分离器械可能是更为合理的临床决策。本文报道1例术前存在根尖周病变的患牙,治疗过程中发生超出根尖孔的器械分离,经过综合评估后采用保留处置方案。通过9年随访观察,该患牙仍具有良好的功能状态,为该处置方法的临床有效性和长期性提供了验证。

Instrument separation in the apical region, particularly when the fragment extends beyond the apical foramen, often presents significant clinical challenges. Conventional retrieval techniques typically require excessive removal of radicular dentin, which may not only lead to complications such as root perforation or fracture, but also compromise the long-term prognosis of the affected tooth. However, for cases occurring during the final stages of high-quality root canal treatment, retaining the separated instrument may represent a more rational clinical approach when strict indications are met. This article reports a tooth with preoperative periapical pathology that experienced instrument separation extending beyond the apical foramen during treatment. Following comprehensive evaluation, a retention protocol was adopted. Nine years of follow-up observations confirmed the tooth's maintained functional integrity, validating the clinical efficacy and long-term sustainability of this management approach.

图1 36慢性根尖周炎患者根管治疗过程X线片 A:术前;B:试尖;C:术后,红色箭头指示分离器械。
图2 36慢性根尖周炎患者根管治疗后随访X线片 A:19个月;B:28个月;C:7年;D:9年。
图3 36慢性根尖周炎患者根管治疗术后7年锥形束CT(CBCT) A:冠状面,近中根尖与下颌神经管关系;B:冠状面,远中根尖与下颌神经管关系;C:矢状面,近中根与下颌神经管关系;D:矢状面,根分叉区域略呈低密度影;E:水平面,根分叉区域;F:水平面,根尖区域。
图4 36慢性根尖周炎患者根管治疗随访口内像 A:术后7年;B:术后9年。
[1]
Fan Y, Gao Y, Wang X, et al. Expert consensus on management of instrument separation in root canal therapy [J]. Int J Oral Sci202517(1):46. DOI:10.1038/s41368-025-00372-w.
[2]
王祥柱. 根管治疗器械分离的临床管理[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)202317(3):153-161. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2023.03.001.
[3]
杨殷杰,侯本祥.根管内器械分离的医方责任和纠纷防范[J].口腔医学202242(7):577-581. DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.07.001.
[4]
Umre U, Sedani S, Nikhade PP, et al. The good old masserann technique for the retrieval of a separated instrument:An endodontic challenge [J]. Cureus202315(9):e45811. DOI:10.7759/cureus.45811.
[5]
Arshadifar E, Shahabinejad H, Fereidooni R, et al. Possibility of bypassing three fractured rotary NiTi files and its correlation with the degree of root canal curvature and location of the fractured file:An in vitro study [J]. Iran Endod J202217(2):62-66. DOI:10.22037/iej.v17i2.33922.
[6]
Fu M, Zhao S, Zhou X, et al. Removal of a fractured file beyond the apical foramen using robot-assisted endodontic microsurgery:A clinical report [J]. BMC Oral Health202525(1):8. DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05329-9.
[7]
Fujii R, Morinaga K, Asai T, et al. Intentional replantation to treat apical periodontitis of maxillary first molar with foreign body located outside apical foramen using CBCT:A case report [J]. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll202061(2):127-133. DOI:10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0016.
[8]
孙颖,唐晓丽,周园园,等.根管内器械分离的研究进展[J].海南医学201829(8):1139-1142. DOI:CNKI:SUN:HAIN.0.2018-08-030.
[9]
Dioguardi M, Dello Russo C, Scarano F, et al. Analysis of endodontic successes and failures in the removal of fractured endodontic instruments during retreatment:A systematic review,Meta-analysis,and trial sequential analysis [J]. Healthcare (Basel)202412(14):1390. DOI:10.3390/healthcare12141390.
[10]
Rao AS, Surana MA, Shah N, et al. A nationwide cross-sectional study on endodontic instrument fractures and development of a comprehensive classification system [J]. J Conserv Dent Endod202528(9):916-924. DOI:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_307_25.
[11]
陈文琴,陈作良. 器械分离的临床决策[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志201632(6):379-380+381. DOI:CNKI:SUN:LCKY.0.2016-06-026.
[12]
Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique [J]. J Endod200531(6):450-452. DOI:10.1097/01.don.0000148148.98255.15.
[13]
Madarati AA Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments [J]. J Endod201339(5):569-581. DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.033.
[14]
尼娜,叶静,曹申,等. 根管内折断器械的处理措施[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志201626(12):752-755. DOI:10.15956/j.cnki.chin.j.conserv.dent.2016.12.013.
[15]
冯瑞明,薛明. 镍钛器械分离的影响因素及防治策略[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志201811(4):193-199. DOI:10.19538/j.kq.2018.04.001.
[16]
Agrawal V, Kapoor S, Patel M. Ultrasonic technique to retrieve a rotary nickel-titanium file broken beyond the apex and a stainless steel file from the root canal of a mandibular molar:A case report [J]. J Dent (Tehran)201512(7):532-536.
[17]
Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment [J]. J Endod200531(12):845-850. DOI:10.1097/01.don.0000164127.62864.7c.
[18]
de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, et al. Treatment outcome in endodontics:The Toronto study-phase 4:Initial treatment [J]. J Endod200834(3):258-263. DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.017.
[19]
Cujé J, Bargholz C, Hülsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice [J]. Int Endod J201043(7):545-554. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01652.x.
[20]
Siqueira JF Jr. A etiology of root canal treatment failure:Why well-treated teeth can fail [J]. Int Endod J200134(1):1-10. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x.
[21]
Chogle S, Zuaitar M, Sarkis R, et al. The recommendation of cone-beam computed tomography and its effect on endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning [J]. J Endod202046(2):162-168. DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.034.
[22]
Amza O, Dimitriu B, Suciu I, et al. Etiology and prevention of an endodontic iatrogenic event:Instrument fracture [J]. J Med Life202013(3):378-381. DOI:10.25122/jml-2020-0137.
[1] 杨一辰, 廖习成, 马玥麟, 李迎, 王祥柱. 基于旁路的复杂器械分离经根管取出策略探索与疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 369-377.
[2] 黄卓, 乔玮玮, 王莉. 根管治疗中器械分离的预后评估与处理决策[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 360-368.
[3] 梅昆洲, 孙同正, 孙雁斐, 张雅萌, 崔严文, 杨芳. 左上第一恒磨牙根尖周炎伴牙颈部外吸收一例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 198-203.
[4] 卢铭浩, 李红, 侯本祥. 根尖生物膜清除方法的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 257-261.
[5] 董磊, 李修珍, 韩林孜, 杨芳. 牙髓血运重建术治疗年轻恒磨牙慢性根尖周炎的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 38-42.
[6] 王祥柱. 根管治疗器械分离的临床管理[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 153-161.
[7] 王军辉, 胡颖, 刘芳, 王飞, 陈宇江, 王小竞. 浓缩生长因子用于年轻恒牙根尖周炎再生性牙髓治疗2例及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 81-88.
[8] 王涛, 朱顶贵, 郭世梁, 张心宇, 邢向辉. 三种方法治疗年轻恒牙根尖周病的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 341-347.
[9] 姚丽萍, 张蕾, 林玉红, 张梦晗, 卢志山. 纳米银溶液用于慢性根尖周炎根管内封药的实验动物研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 95-100.
[10] 古丽莎, 龚启梅, 周玉竹, 韦曦. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间对急性牙痛临床诊疗工作的防控建议[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 9-13.
[11] 吴蕊含, 孟箭. 根尖周炎致眶尖综合征合并大面积脑梗塞一例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(03): 228-229.
[12] 周俊, 王兆晶, 陈文瑨, 陈文霞. 血管内皮生长因子和骨形成蛋白2诱导犬恒牙原位牙髓再生[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(01): 5-10.
[13] 杨雨虹, 唐倩. 往复式运动镍钛器械的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(04): 337-340.
[14] 杜健荣, 张晨娇, 彭志翔. 粪肠球菌与难治性根尖周炎相关性的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(04): 274-280.
[15] 孟磊, 卢志山, 柳忠豪, 张韬文, 任光辉. 难治性根尖周炎根尖生物膜内粪肠球菌的检出及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(06): 512-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?