Home  About misconduct   中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05): 409-415. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.05.011

Special Issue:

• Clinic Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of two types of intra-oral fixation devices in maxillary protraction

Yongjian Xie1,(), Lixiang Mai1, Xinhua Lu1   

  1. 1. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2015-02-14 Online:2015-10-01 Published:2015-10-01
  • Contact: Yongjian Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Yongjian, Email: , Tel: 20-83802802

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the difference of the treatment effect of the maxillary protraction therapy with rapid palatal expansion appliance or with wrapped bite-plate removable appliance as intra-oral fixation devices.

Methods

Twenty-three skeletal ClassⅢ maxillary retrusion patients were selected and treated with maxillary protraction, the intra-oral devices were rapid palatal expansion appliance in 13 patients and wrapped bite-plate removable appliance in 10 patients. Paired t-test was used to compare the lateral cephalometric radiographs before and after treatment; the difference before and after treatment of two groups was compared with t-test of independent samples in group.

Results

SNA, Co-Po, Y-axis, MP/FH, MP/SN, PP/MP, U1/SN, ANA-Me, N-Me, S-Go increased, ANB decreased significantly in both groups. In rapid palatal expansion group, S-N, Ptm-A increased significantly, the lower incisors tipped lingual significantly. In wrapped bite-plate group, S-Ba, N-Me increased, facial angle decreased significantly (P<0.05) . The difference before and after maxillary protraction of two groups had no significant except S-Ba and NPg-FH (P>0.05) .

Conclusion

Maxillary protraction combined with rapid palatal expansion or with wrapped bite-plate removable appliance was effective in the treatment of Class Ⅲ patients with maxillary deficiency, the treatment effects had no significant difference in two groups.

Key words: Rapid palatal expansion, Maxillary protraction, Maxillary retrusion

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87330582 E-mail: zhkqyxyj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd