Home  About misconduct   中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05): 428-438. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2026.05.010

• Review • Previous Articles    

Risk stratification and pathway management of severe oral and maxillofacial multispace infection: A comprehensive evaluation based on the OMSI-PI four-domain integrated framework

Hui Huang1,2, Yaqin Wei2   

  1. 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Foshan 528200, China
    2Department of Stomatology, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2025-10-09 Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-10-26

Abstract:

Based on a review of relevant literature published between 2004 and 2025 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, together with current guidelines, expert consensus statements, and representative clinical studies, this article proposes a four-domain integrated framework for oral and maxillofacial multispace infection (OMSI) centered on the physiology-inflammation axis. The framework is intended to support risk stratification and pathway-oriented management of severe OMSI by integrating evidence across four domains: Physiological decompensation, infection extent and anatomical involvement, inflammatory response, and host reserve. Risk assessment of severe OMSI should not depend on any single indicator. The proposed physiology-inflammation axis-based framework applies weighted integration of clinical information, in which physiological decompensation and infection extent with anatomical involvement directly determine the urgency of early intervention, whereas inflammatory response and host reserve are used to assess infection activity, treatment response, and the patient's tolerance of infection, anesthesia, surgery, and other interventions. Pathway-oriented management is organized around key time windows: Airway assessment and initial resuscitation at 0 h<t≤1 h, incision and drainage with source control at 1 h<t≤6 h, intensified multisystem monitoring at 6 h<t≤24 h, the first systematic reassessment at 24 h<t≤48 h, and de-escalation, rehabilitation, and follow-up at t>48 h according to the patient's clinical condition. By incorporating risk-factor identification, bedside assessment, risk stratification, and multidisciplinary collaboration into a unified decision-making pathway, the framework may facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients and the organization of structured clinical management. At present, the framework remains exploratory, and the weighting of individual indicators, threshold settings, and boundaries of clinical applicability require further validation and refinement through multicenter prospective studies.

Key words: Oral and maxillofacial multi-space infection, Deep neck infection, Descending necrotizing mediastinitis, Risk stratification, Structured assessment, Pathway-oriented management

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87330582 E-mail: zhkqyxyj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd