Research progress of micropower systems in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (Class C, Pell & Gregory)

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2022.04.011

Abstract

Abstract:

The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (Class C, Pell & Gregory) is a complicated operation in alveolar surgery. In recent years, with the rapid development of minimally invasive techniques in the field of dentistry, traditional extraction techniques have been gradually replaced. To make tooth extraction safe, comfortable, efficient and minimally invasive, high-speed dental handpieces, piezo-surgery, speed-increasing contra-angle handpieces and other micropower equipment have been gradually applied in clinical practice. Such micropower devices have their own advantages and disadvantages, such that the combined use of them has been found in clinic. Based on the complementarity, the degree of invasiveness, efficiency as well as the concept of less bone removal and more teeth separation, this article discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the latest micropower systems and their combined use in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, so as to provide clinicians and patients with more options.

Key words: High-speed dental handpiece, Implanter, Piezos-urgery, Speed-increasing contra-angle handpiece

Na Li, Yawei Fan. Research progress of micropower systems in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (Class C, Pell & Gregory)[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 265-268.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2022.04.011

https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2022/V16/I04/265

References 34

[1]	Arta SA，Pourabbas Kheyradin R，Mesgarzadeh AH，et al. Comparison of the influence of two flap designs on periodontal healing after surgical extraction of impacted third molars[J]. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects，2011，5（1）：1-4. DOI：10.5681/joddd.2011.001.
[2]	Le SH，Nguyen NM，Nguyen NT，et al. Anatomical positions of mesially/horizontally impacted mandibular third molars are significant predictors for distal caries in adjacent second molars[J]. Int J Dent，2022：8482209. DOI：10.1155/2022/8482209.
[3]	Peñarrocha-Diago M，Camps-Font O，Sánchez-Torres A，et al. Indications of the extraction of symptomatic impacted third molars. A systematic review[J]. J Clin Exp Dent，2021，13（3）：e278-e286. DOI：10.4317/jced.56887.
[4]	Guillaumet-Claure MA，Juiz-Camps AM，Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of intraoperative and postoperative iatrogenic mandibular fractures after lower third molar extraction：A systematic review[J]. J Clin Exp Dent，2022，14（1）：e85-e94. DOI：10.4317/jced.58390.
[5]	Kilpatrick HC. Removal of impacted third molars utilizing speeds up to 200，000 r.p.m[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol，1958，11（4）：364-369. DOI：10.1016/0030-4220(58)90073-2.
[6]	胡开进，李永锋.牙槽外科新进展[J].实用医院临床杂志，2014，11（3）：14-17.
[7]	Lempel E，Szalma J. Effect of spray air settings of speed-increasing contra-angle handpieces on intrapulpal temperatures，drilling times，and coolant spray pattern[J]. Clin Oral Investig，2022，26（1）：523-533. DOI：10.1007/s00784-021-04030-3.
[8]	齐小良，张丽军.气动牙挺与传统牙挺用于不同难度牙拔除术效果比较[J].人民军医，2021，64（12）：1279-1281+1283. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1000-9736.2021.12.033.
[9]	郭竹玲，黄厂，冉秋池，等.一种同步可视化牙科手机的研发与应用[J].中国医疗器械信息，24（21）：26+33. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2018.21.010.
[10]	Emery RW，Korj O，Agarwal R. A review of in-office dynamic image navigation for extraction of complex mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2017，75（8）：1591-1600. DOI：10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.031.
[11]	Pavlíková G，Foltán R，Horká M，et al. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2011，40（5）：451-457. DOI：10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.013.
[12]	Gülnahar Y，Hüseyin Köşger H，Tutar Y. A comparison of piezosurgery and conventional surgery by heat shock protein 70 expression[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2013，42（4）：508-510. DOI：10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.027.
[13]	Al-Delayme RMA. Randomized clinical study comparing Piezoelectric Surgery with conventional rotatory osteotomy in mandibular third molars surgeries[J]. Saudi Dent J，2021，33（1）：11-21. DOI：10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.010.
[14]	D′Alessandro D，Ricci C，Milazzo M，et al. Piezoelectric Signals in vascularized bone regeneration[J]. Biomolecules，2021，11（11）：1731. DOI：10.3390/biom11111731.
[15]	Vucetic M，Freilich M，Marija MS，et al. The effect of piezosurgery on the oxidative stress and immediate post extraction discomfort following complex teeth extractions prior to implant placement[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2018，29：467. DOI：10.1111/clr.352_13358.
[16]	Martins M，Vieira WA，Paranhos LR，et al. Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in schneider′s membrane sinus lifting：A pilot randomized trial[J]. J Clin Exp Dent，2021，13（8）：e802-e808. DOI：10.4317/jced.57953.
[17]	Petroni G，Passaretti A，Zaccheo F，et al. Lingual flap protection during third molar surgery：A literature review[J]. Eur J Dent，2021，15（4）：776-781. DOI：10.1055/s-0041-1730042.
[18]	El Mobadder M，Nammour S，Ortega M，et al. Photobiomodulation therapy applied after 6 months for the management of a severe inferior alveolar nerve injury[J]. Life（Basel），2021，11（12）：1420. DOI：10.3390/life11121420.
[19]	Nehme W，Fares Y，Abou-Abbas L. Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery：A randomized clinical trial[J]. BMC Oral Health，2021，21（1）：393. DOI：10.1186/s12903-021-01759-x.
[20]	Alrefai M，Daboul A，Fleischhacker B，et al. Piezoelectric versus conventional techniques for orthognathic surgery：Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Stomatol，Oral and Maxillofac Surg，2022，123（5）：e273-e278. DOI：10.1016/j.jormas.2021.12.005.
[21]	Valente NA，Cosma L，Nocca G，et al. Piezoelectric device versus conventional osteotomy instruments in the comparison of three different bone harvesting methods：An istomorphometric，phonometric，and chronometric evaluation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants，2019，34（5）：1070-1077. DOI：10.11607/jomi.7309.
[22]	Gulnahar Y，Alpan AL. Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery：A split-mouth clinical study[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal，2021，26（3）：e269-e275. DOI：10.4317/medoral.24085.
[23]	Sayed N，Bakathir A，Pasha M，et al. Complications of third molar extraction：A retrospective study from a tertiary healthcare centre in Oman[J]. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J，2019，19（3）：e230-e235. DOI：10.18295/squmj.2019.19.03.009.
[24]	Aniko-Włodarczyk M，Jaroń A，Preuss O，et al. Evaluation of the effect of surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the second molar-prospective study[J]. J Clin Med，2021，10（12）：2655. DOI：10.3390/jcm10122655.
[25]	Rotella M，Ercoli C，Funkenbusch PD，et al. Performance of single-use and multiuse diamond rotary cutting instruments with turbine and electric handpieces[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2014，111（1）：56-63. DOI：10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.003.
[26]	Ercoli C，Rotella M，Funkenbusch PD，et al. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part Ⅱ：electric handpiece and comparison with turbine[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2009，101（5）：319-331. DOI：10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60064-0.
[27]	Campbell SC. Are friends electric？：A review of the electric handpiece in clinical dental practice[J]. Dent Update，2013，40（3）：194-196，199-200. DOI：10.12968/denu.2013.40.3.194.
[28]	Watson TF，Flanagan D，Stone DG. High and low torque handpieces：Cutting dynamics，enamel cracking and tooth temperature[J]. Br Dent J，2000，188（12）：680-686. DOI：10.1038/sj.bdj.4800576.
[29]	Spagnolo AM，Sartini M，Cristina ML. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines and potential risk of infection：A narrative review[J]. Pathogens，2020，9（8）：651. DOI：10.3390/pathogens9080651.
[30]	Allison JR，Edwards DC，Bowes C，et al. The effect of high-speed dental handpiece coolant delivery and design on aerosol and droplet production[J]. J Dent，2021，112：103746. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103746.
[31]	向国林，李林林，魏钰璋，等.超声骨刀联合45°反角涡轮钻拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床应用[J].口腔医学研究，2020，36（7）：674-677. DOI：10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.07.015.
[32]	Srivastava P，Shetty P，Shetty S. Comparison of surgical outcome after impacted third molar surgery using piezotome and a conventional rotary handpiece[J]. Contemp Clin Dent，2018，9（Suppl 2）：S318-S324. DOI：10.4103/ccd.ccd_354_18.
[33]	白希婧，吕东升，周贤，等.增速手机配合种植机与高速涡轮机在下颌低位阻生智齿中的应用比较[J].广东医学，2020，41（4）：349-352. DOI：10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20193284.
[34]	李方，王涛，苏智勇，等.低速直机配合高速涡轮机微创拔牙法的临床研究[J].实用中西医结合临床，2021，21（9）：98-99. DOI：10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2021.09.049.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export