The influence of different hybrid micro/nano hierarchical titanium topographies on osteoblast biological functions

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.06.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To compare different effects of cells on titanium surfaces with different micro/nano structures, and to evaluate different functions of micro- and nano-features, respectively.

Methods

All the titanium disc samples were divided into four groups and accepted the following treatments: (1) sandblasted only (S) ; (2) sandblasted followed by acid-etching (SLA) ; (3) sandblasted followed by alkali-heat (SAH) ; (4) sandblasted followed by anodizing (SAN) . The surface topography, elemental component and roughness of samples were examined. Surface biocompatibility and osteogenic capability were evaluated by cell counting kit (CCK-8) and alkaline phosphate activity (ALP) in vitro. The level of significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA followed by a least significant difference (LSD) t-test for a multiple comparison procedure.

Results

Surface of group S were showed only microtopography of pits, while the other three groups exhibited primary micro-structure modified by secondary nano-features of ditches (SLA) , nano-porous network layers (SAH) and nanotubes (SAN) , respectively. There was no significant difference of cell adhesion and proliferation in the 1st and 3rd day. Group SAH and SAN (1.546 and 1.528) enhanced cell proliferation significantly than Group S (1.31) in the 5th day (F = 3.229, P = 0.042) , in the 7th day, Group SAH and SAN (2.646 and 2.57) also significantly enhanced cell proliferation than Group S (2.24) (F = 3.51, P = 0.035) and induced affluent and stretched cell pseudopods. Moreover, pseudopods on the surface of group SAH grow into the network and wrap around the net to link to each other. In comparison, group SAH (77.656) significantly enhanced ALP activity in the 7th day than Group S, SLA and SAN (53.132, 51.052 and 62.207, respectively) (F = 29.734, P<0.001) , though the ALP activity of group SAN depressed in the early stage but enhanced significantly than Group S and SLA (82.885 and 73.303) in the 14th day (F = 46.052, P<0.001) .

Conclusions

Microstructures decided the roughness while nanostructures, especially nano-porous functioned in enhancing cell proliferation and differentiation. The forms of nano-porous induced cell pseudopods stretch, for which nano-porous network allowed cells to grow into and form extensive interlocking.

Key words: Surface modification, Micro/Nano structure, Titanium, Nano networks, Nanotubes

Jiayun Xu, Feilong Deng, Xiumei Zhuang, Jianglin Ou-Yang, Yun Liu, Jing Wang, Xiachen Li. The influence of different hybrid micro/nano hierarchical titanium topographies on osteoblast biological functions[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(06): 461-469.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.06.005

https://zhkqyxyjzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2015/V09/I06/461

Figures/Tables 13

References 16

[1]	Zhao L，Liu L，Wu Z，et al. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation[J]. Biomaterials，2012，33(9):2629-2641.
[2]	Amin Yavari S，van der Stok J，Chai YC，et al. Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium[J]. Biomaterials，2014，35(24):6172-6181.
[3]	Variola F，Vetrone F，Richert L，et al. Improving biocompatibility of implantable metals by nanoscale modification of surfaces：an overview of strategies，fabrication methods，and challenges[J]. Small，2009，5(9):996-1006.
[4]	Bressan E，Sbricoli L，Guazzo R，et al. Nanostructured surfaces of dental implants[J]. Int J Mol Sci，2013，14(1):1918-1931.
[5]	Meirelles L，Arvidsson A，Albrektsson T，et al. Increased bone formation to unstable nano rough titanium implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2007，18(3):326-332.
[6]	Khang D，Lu J，Yao C，et al. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium[J]. Biomaterials，2008，29(8):970-983.
[7]	Zhao L，Mei S，Chu PK，et al. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surfaces with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions[J]. Biomaterials，2010，31(19):5072-5082.
[8]	Zhang E，Zou C. Porous titanium and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite biomodification prepared by a biomimetic process：characterization and in vivo evaluation[J]. Acta Biomater，2009，5(5):1732-1741.
[9]	Le Guéhennec L，Soueidan A，Layrolle P，et al. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration[J]. Dent Mater，2007，23(7):844-854.
[10]	Zhuang XM，Zhou B，Ouyang JL，et al. Enhanced MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts response and bone formation on the addition of nano-needle and nano-porous features to microtopographical titanium surfaces[J]. Biomed Mater，2014，9(4):045001.
[11]	Albrektsson T，Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces：Part 1—review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them[J]. Int J Prosthodont，2004，17(5):536-543.
[12]	Tay CY，Irvine SA，Boey FY，et al. Micro-/nano-engineered cellular responses for soft tissue engineering and biomedical applications[J]. Small，2011，7(10):1361-1378.
[13]	McBeath R，Pirone DM，Nelson CM，et al. Cell shape，cytoskeletal tension，and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment[J]. Dev Cell，2004，6(4):483-495.
[14]	Mullen L，Stamp RC，Brooks WK，et al. Selective laser melting：a regular unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous，titanium，bone in-growth constructs，suitable for orthopedic applications[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater，2009，89(2):325-334.
[15]	Zhang Z，Jones D，Yue S，et al. Hierarchical tailoring of strut architecture to control permeability of additive manufactured titanium implants[J]. Mater Sci and Eng C Mater Biol Appl，2013，33(7):4055-4062.
[16]	Mullen L，Stamp RC，Fox P，et al. Selective laser melting：a unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous，titanium，bone in-growth constructs，suitable for orthopedic applications. Ⅱ. Randomized structures[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater，2010，92(1):178-188.

组别	钛	氧	碳	镁	钙
S组	99.86	0.14	-	-	-
SLA组	75.16	17.34	7.50	-	-
SAH组	35.13	49.66	13.89	0.36	0.28
SAN组	52.73	36.65	5.59	-	-

组别	钛	氧	碳	镁	钙
S组	99.86	0.14	-	-	-
SLA组	75.16	17.34	7.50	-	-
SAH组	35.13	49.66	13.89	0.36	0.28
SAN组	52.73	36.65	5.59	-	-

组别	样品数	Ra	Rq
S组	6	1.55 ± 0.08	1.87 ± 0.10
SLA组	6	1.90 ± 0.07	2.33 ± 0.10
SAH组	6	1.46 ± 0.04	1.87 ± 0.09
SAN组	6	1.55 ± 0.06	1.91 ± 0.06

组别	样品数	Ra	Rq
S组	6	1.55 ± 0.08	1.87 ± 0.10
SLA组	6	1.90 ± 0.07	2.33 ± 0.10
SAH组	6	1.46 ± 0.04	1.87 ± 0.09
SAN组	6	1.55 ± 0.06	1.91 ± 0.06

组别	样品数	A值
组别	样品数	1d	3d	5d	7d
S组	3	0.467 ± 0.015	1.210 ± 0.098	1.308 ± 0.072	2.246 ± 0.146
SLA组	3	0.491 ± 0.031	1.343 ± 0.174	1.385 ± 0.135	2.364 ± 0.100
SAH组	3	0.495 ± 0.041	1.399 ± 0.029	1.546 ± 0.107	2.646 ± 0.258
SAN组	3	0.514 ± 0.038	1.356 ± 0.094	1.528 ± 0.142	2.565 ± 0.087
F值	?	2.498	1.263	3.229	3.512
P值	?	0.092	0.318	0.042	0.035

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export