切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 363 -371. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2026.05.003

口腔感染微生态专栏·论著

即配型微酸性电解水对根管中粪肠球菌的抗菌效果
栾梦圆, 高秀芝, 律娜†()   
  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院口腔科,合肥 230032
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-01 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 律娜

Efficacy of on-site prepared slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Enterococcus faecalis root canal infections

Mengyuan Luan, Xiuzhi Gao, Na Lü†()   

  1. Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
  • Received:2026-03-01 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Na Lü
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Higher Education Institutions in Anhui Province(2024AH04011)
引用本文:

栾梦圆, 高秀芝, 律娜. 即配型微酸性电解水对根管中粪肠球菌的抗菌效果[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 363-371.

Mengyuan Luan, Xiuzhi Gao, Na Lü. Efficacy of on-site prepared slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Enterococcus faecalis root canal infections[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 363-371.

目的

评估即配型微酸性电解水(SAEW)对根管治疗中常见且顽固的病原菌粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)的体外抗菌效果,初步探讨其作用机制。

方法

即配型SAEW经现场电解制备后测定其对浮游菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与最低杀菌浓度(MBC)。建立离体单根管牙感染模型,感染牙采用随机数字表法分为4组,分别使用0.9%氯化钠溶液(A组)、低浓度SAEW(MIC)(B组)、高浓度SAEW(2×MIC)(C组)及5.25%次氯酸钠(NaClO)溶液(D组)进行根管冲洗。通过冲洗前后的细菌取样与菌落计数,评估即刻抗菌效果。使用扫描电镜(SEM)观察处理后的细菌超微结构,利用激光共聚焦显微镜结合SYTO 9/PI荧光染色,定量分析SAEW对细菌细胞膜完整性的影响。通过细胞计数(CCK-8)法检测SAEW在人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFC)中的毒性。所有数据采用SPSS 26.0软件分析,以双侧P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

即配型SAEW对浮游及根管内的E. faecalis表现出明确的浓度依赖性抗菌活性,MIC与MBC值分别为6.25和12.50 mg/L。4组根管内E. faecalis菌落减少率组间差异具有统计学意义(F = 306.46,P<0.001),A、B、C、D组细菌减少率分别为(25.69 ± 7.41)%、(73.38 ± 1.69)%、(85.89 ± 2.09)%、(96.60 ± 1.33)%。B、C、D组细菌减少率均显著高于A组,C组高于B组但低于D组(均P<0.001),提示SAEW杀菌效果呈浓度依赖性,其即刻杀菌效力弱于5.25% NaClO溶液。SEM显示各组细菌均出现不同程度结构破坏;激光共聚焦定量结果显示,A、B、C和D组细菌细胞膜损伤率分别为0.84%、74.39%、87.38%和92.62%,差异有统计学意义(F = 2 056.72,P<0.001),提示SAEW可通过破坏细菌细胞膜完整性发挥抗菌作用。有效抗菌浓度的SAEW处理后HGFC存活率均高于90%,而NaClO溶液组细胞存活率不足10%。

结论

SAEW可有效抑制杀灭E. faecalis,虽体外即时杀菌速率不及高浓度NaClO溶液,但凭借良好抗菌效能与生物相容性,有望作为传统根管冲洗剂的补充或替代方案,后续仍需在复杂生物膜及体内模型中开展进一步验证。

Objective

To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial effect of freshly-prepared slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), a common and persistent pathogen in root-canal therapy, and to preliminarily explore its underlying mechanism.

Methods

Freshly-prepared SAEW was produced by on-site electrolysis. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of SAEW against planktonic E. faecalis were determined. An ex-vivo infected single-rooted tooth model was established. Infected teeth were assigned into four groups by simple randomization, and root canals were irrigated with 0.9% sodium chloride solution, low-concentration SAEW (MIC), high-concentration SAEW (2×MIC), and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution, respectively. Immediate antibacterial efficacy was assessed by bacterial sampling and colony counting before and after irrigation. Root-canal irrigants were collected. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe bacterial ultrastructural alterations. Confocal laser scanning microscopy combined with SYTO 9/PI fluorescent staining was performed to quantitatively analyze the effect of SAEW on bacterial membrane integrity. The cytotoxicity of SAEW toward human gingival fibroblast cells (HGFCs) was detected using the CCK-8 assay. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 26.0. Normality and homogeneity-of-variance tests were performed for quantitative data. Normally distributed data with homogeneous variances were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the least-significant-difference (LSD) post-hoc test was applied for multi-group comparisons. A two-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Freshly-prepared SAEW exhibited distinct concentration-dependent antibacterial activity against both planktonic and intracanal E. faecalis. The MIC and MBC values of SAEW for planktonic E. faecalis were 6.25 and 12.50 mg/L, respectively. The overall difference in the colony reduction rates of Enterococcus faecalis among the four groups was statistically significant (F = 306.46, P<0.001). The colony reduction rates of groups A, B, C, and D were (25.69 ± 7.41) %, (73.38 ± 1.69) %, (85.89 ± 2.09) %, and (96.60 ± 1.33) %, respectively. Compared with group A, groups B, C, and D exhibited significantly higher colony reduction rates. Moreover, group C showed a significantly higher antibacterial effect than group B but a lower bactericidal efficacy than group D (all P<0.001). These results indicated that SAEW exerts a concentration-dependent antibacterial effect, while its immediate bactericidal potency is inferior to 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Scanning electron microscopy revealed varying degrees of bacterial ultrastructural damage in each group. Quantitative confocal laser scanning microscopy with SYTO 9/PI staining showed bacterial membrane-damage rates of 0.84% for the 0.9% sodium-chloride group, 74.39% for the low-concentration-SAEW group, 87.38% for the high-concentration-SAEW group, and 92.62% for the 5.25% sodium-hypochlorite group, with significant inter-group differences (F = 2 056.72, P<0.001). These findings indicated that SAEW exerted antibacterial effects by disrupting bacterial membrane integrity in a concentration-dependent manner. At effective antibacterial concentrations, the viability of HGFCs remained above 90% in SAEW-treated groups, whereas cell viability was below 10% in the sodium-hypochlorite-treated group.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that SAEW could effectively inhibit and kill E. faecalis. Although its immediate in vitro bactericidal potency may be lower than that of high-concentration sodium hypochlorite, SAEW showed promising potential as a supplementary or alternative root-canal irrigant owing to its favorable antibacterial performance and biocompatibility. Further validation using complex biofilm and in vivo models is required.

图1 即配型微酸性电解水(SAEW)对粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)的抗菌活性 A:最小抑菌浓度(MIC)检测;B:最小杀菌浓度(MBC)检测;MIC与MBC分别为6.25与12.50 mg/L。
图2 不同冲洗剂处理后的根管内粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)的抑菌率的统计柱图 A组使用0.9%无菌NaCl溶液;B组使用低浓度的SAEW溶液(MIC);C组使用高浓度SAEW溶液(2×MIC);D组使用5.25% NaClO溶液;组间比较差异有统计学意义,aP<0.001。
图3 扫描电镜(SEM)下观察不同冲洗剂处理后粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)的形态学变化 A:A组使用0.9%无菌NaCl溶液,细菌形态完整,表面光滑,结构正常;B:B组使用低浓度的SAEW溶液(MIC),细菌细胞壁出现破损、内容物泄漏;C:C组使用高浓度SAEW溶液(2×MIC),细胞壁皱缩、不规则凹陷及内容物渗漏;D:D组使用5.25% NaClO溶液,细菌结构皱缩崩解。
图4 激光共聚焦显微镜观察不同冲洗剂处理后的粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)经SYTO 9/PI染色结果 A:0.9%无菌NaCl溶液对照组,细菌呈现强烈的绿色荧光,表明细胞膜完整;B:低浓度微酸性电解水(SAEW)处理组,视野中同时出现大量红色荧光与绿色荧光,表明细胞膜损伤细菌比例显著增加;C:高浓度SAEW处理组,膜受损细菌进一步增加;D:5.25% NaClO溶液组,细菌呈现强烈的红色荧光,膜受损细菌比例显著高于各SAEW组。
图5 经不同冲洗剂处理后的粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)细胞膜未受损率 A组使用0.9%无菌NaCl溶液;B组使用低浓度的SAEW溶液(MIC);C组使用高浓度SAEW溶液(2×MIC);D组使用5.25% NaClO溶液。组间比较差异有统计学意义,aP<0.001。
图6 微酸性电解水(SAEW)与次氯酸钠(NaClO)对人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFC)的体外毒性比较 采用细胞计数(CCK-8)法检测各组HGFC经不同试剂处理5 min后的细胞相对存活率。A组:0.9%无菌NaCl溶液组;B组:低浓度SAEW组(MIC,最低抑菌浓度);C组:中高浓度SAEW组(2×MIC,最低杀菌浓度);D组:超高浓度SAEW组(4×MIC);E组:5.25% NaClO溶液组。图中数据以 ± s表示(n = 3);aP>0.05,bP<0.05,cP<0.001。
[1]
Mominkhan D,Brito L C N,Yakubu A R,et al. Exploring relationships within the microbiome of root canal infections and the influence of associated clinical parameters[J]. Int Endod J,2025,58(11):1751-1763. DOI:10.1111/iej.70011.
[2]
Wu S,Liu Y,Zhang H,et al. Nano-graphene oxide with antisense walR RNA inhibits the pathogenicity of Enterococcus faecalis in periapical periodontitis[J]. J Dent Sci,2020,15(1):65-74. DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2019.09.006.
[3]
Barbosa-Ribeiro M,Arruda-Vasconcelos R,Louzada L M,et al. Microbiological analysis of endodontically treated teeth with apical periodontitis before and after endodontic retreatment[J]. Clin Oral Investig,2021,25(4):2017-2027. DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03510-2.
[4]
Azad A,Rostamifar S,Modaresi F,et al. Assessment of the antibacterial effects of bismuth nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis[J]. Biomed Res Int,2020(2020):5465439. DOI:10.1155/2020/5465439.
[5]
Siqueira J F,Antunes H S,Pérez A R,et al. The apical root canal system of teeth with posttreatment apical periodontitis:Correlating microbiologic,tomographic,and histopathologic findings[J]. J Endod,2020,46(9):1195-1203. DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.020.
[6]
Polak D,Yaya A,Levy D H,et al. Enterococcus faecalis sustained infection induces macrophage pro-resolution polarization[J]. Int Endod J,2021,54(10):1840-1849. DOI:10.1111/iej.13574.
[7]
Siqueira J F,Antunes H S,Rôças I N,et al. Microbiome in the apical root canal system of teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis[J]. PLoS One,2016,11(9):e0162887. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0162887.
[8]
Ding L,Yang Y,Zheng C,et al. Activities of eravacycline,tedizolid,norvancomycin,nemonoxacin,ceftaroline,and comparators against 1,871 staphylococcus and 1,068 enterococcus species isolates from China:Updated report of the CHINET study 2019[J]. Microbiol Spectr,2022,10(6):e0171522. DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01715-22.
[9]
余擎,相豆豆,程小刚,等.根管再次感染中粪肠球菌作用的再认识[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2024,29(1):4-11. DOI:10.15956/j.cnki.chin.j.conserv.dent.2024.01.002.
[10]
谢媛,程兴群,李雨庆,等.粪肠球菌牙本质黏附及其影响因素的研究进展[J].口腔疾病防治,2024,32(8):632-639. DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2024.08.009.
[11]
Boutsioukis C,Arias-Moliz M T. Present status and future directions-irrigants and irrigation methods[J]. Int Endod J,2022,55(Suppl 3):588-612. DOI:10.1111/iej.13739.
[12]
Gomes B P F A,Aveiro E,Kishen A. Irrigants and irrigation activation systems in Endodontics[J]. Braz Dent J,2023,34(4):1-33. DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202305577.
[13]
Ghazizadeh M,Davoodabadi A,Kazemi S,et al. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of mentha longifolia essential oil against Enterococcus faecalis and its chemical composition[J]. J Dent (Shiraz),2025,26(3):266-273. DOI:10.30476/dentjods.2025.101488.2304.
[14]
Şenel K,Uzun I,Alqawasmi R. An in vitro evaluation of biofilm removal from simulated root canals using sodium hypochlorite irrigation solution at various temperature settings[J]. PLoS One,2025,20(6):e0325431. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325431.
[15]
Cai C,Chen X,Li Y,Jiang Q. Advances in the role of sodium hypochlorite irrigant in chemical preparation of root canal treatment[J]. Biomed Res Int,2023(2023):8858283. DOI:10.1155/2023/8858283.
[16]
Hampton M B,Dickerhof N. Inside the phagosome:A bacterial perspective[J]. Immunol Rev,2023,314(1):197-209. DOI:10.1111/imr.13182.
[17]
da Cruz Nizer W S,Inkovskiy V,Overhage J. Surviving reactive chlorine stress:Responses of gram-negative bacteria to hypochlorous acid[J]. Microorganisms,2020,8(8):1220. DOI:10.3390/microorganisms8081220.
[18]
Herruzo R,Herruzo I. Antimicrobial efficacy of a very stable hyperchlorous acid formula compared with other antiseptics used in treating wounds:In vitro study on micro-organisms with or without biofilm[J]. J Hosp Infect,2020,105(2):289-294. DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.013.
[19]
Burian E A,Sabah L,Kirketerp-Møller K,et al. The safety and antimicrobial properties of stabilized hypochlorous acid in acetic acid buffer for the treatment of acute wounds:A human pilot study and in vitro data[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds,2023,22(2):369-377. DOI:10.1177/15347346211015656.
[20]
Lafaurie G I,Zaror C,Diaz-Báez D,et al. Evaluation of substantivity of hypochlorous acid as an antiplaque agent:A randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Dent Hygiene,2018,16(4):527-534. DOI:10.1111/idh.12342.
[21]
Castillo D M,Castillo Y,Delgadillo N A,et al. Viability and effects on bacterial proteins by oral rinses with hypochlorous acid as active ingredient[J]. Braz Dent J,2015,26(5):519-524. DOI:10.1590/0103-6440201300388.
[22]
Lv S,Fan W,Fan B. Enhanced in vitro antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis by using both low-dose cetylpyridinium chloride and silver ions[J]. BMC Oral Health,2023,23(1):299. DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-02972-6.
[23]
Basak Erol H,Kaskatepe B,Gocmen D,et al. The treatment of Enterococcus faecalis related root canal biofilms with phage therapy[J]. Microb Pathog,2024(197):107081. DOI:10.1016/j.micpath.2024.107081.
[24]
Wu B,Zhou Z,Hong X,et al. Novel approaches on root canal disinfection methods against E. faecalis[J]. J Oral Microbiol,2025,17(1):2475947. DOI:10.1080/20002297.2025.2475947.
[25]
Nasiri K,Wrbas K T,Doychinova M. Eradicating Enterococcus faecalis in root canal system:An update[J]. J Dent Sci,2024,19(4):2433-2434. DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2024.07.020.
[26]
段弘扬,王佳奇,沈瑾,等.微酸性电解水实验室微生物杀灭效果研究[J].中国感染控制杂志,2021,20(3):261-264. DOI:10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20215724.
[27]
蒋迁,孙宇,霍丽珺,等.微酸性电解水对根管内粪肠球菌生物膜抗菌作用的体外研究[J].昆明医科大学学报,2021,42(3):5-9. DOI:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210303.
[28]
Li J,Wang Y,Zheng W,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of treating drinking water for laying hens using slightly acidic electrolyzed water[J]. Poult Sci,2024,103(1):103176. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2023.103176.
[29]
Kazuhiro G,Tomohiko M,Shinichi S,et al. Microbicidal and cytotoxic effects of functional water in vitro[J]. Quintessence Int,2010,41(9):e166-e172.
[30]
Goda B,Ruta Z,Saulius D,et al. Cytotoxicity and efficacy in debris and smear layer removal of hocl-based irrigating solution:An in vitro study[J]. J Funct Biomater,2022,13(3):95. DOI:10.3390/jfb13030095.
[1] 林冬佳, 陈燕活, 彭志翔, 高燕. 粪肠球菌脂磷壁酸对巨噬细胞自噬的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 69-75.
[2] 杜健荣, 张晨娇, 彭志翔. 粪肠球菌与难治性根尖周炎相关性的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(04): 274-280.
[3] 孟磊, 卢志山, 柳忠豪, 张韬文, 任光辉. 难治性根尖周炎根尖生物膜内粪肠球菌的检出及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(06): 512-515.
[4] 刘红艳, 韦曦, 凌均棨. 饥饿状态粪肠球菌生物膜胞外多糖的合成能力[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(05): 416-420.
[5] 庄沛林, 高燕, 凌均棨, 胡晓莉, 王梓屹. 纳米银对牙本质表面粪肠球菌生物膜的杀菌作用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(05): 463-469.
[6] 张静兰, 凌均棨. 粪肠球菌生物膜的药物敏感性研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(03): 235-242.
[7] 李重, 陈飞, 王洪伟. 粪肠球菌预测结直肠癌复发的研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 81-85.
[8] 麦杏连, 刘思瑶, 陈旋, 何倩君, 张中文, 钟国权, 温伟洪, 徐令清. 尿路感染粪肠球菌耐药性与耐药基因相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 65-70.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?