切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 168 -173. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2022.03.006

论著

下颌后牙区不同时机游离龈移植的效果对比
呙誉东1,(), 周炼1, 闫明1   
  1. 1. 东莞健力口腔医院修复种植科,东莞 523000
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-18 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 呙誉东

Comparison of peri-implant free gingival grafting at different timing in the posterior mandible

Yudong Guo1,(), Lian Zhou1, Ming Yan1   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Jianli Stomatological Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2022-04-18 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yudong Guo
引用本文:

呙誉东, 周炼, 闫明. 下颌后牙区不同时机游离龈移植的效果对比[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 168-173.

Yudong Guo, Lian Zhou, Ming Yan. Comparison of peri-implant free gingival grafting at different timing in the posterior mandible[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 168-173.

目的

对不同时机的游离龈移植术(FGG)增加下颌后牙区种植体周颊侧角化龈的临床效果进行评价。

方法

选择2018年10月至2020年10月就诊于东莞健力口腔医院修复种植科下颌后牙区单牙缺失角化牙龈不足的患者(宽度为2 ~ 4 mm)共40例,将纳入的40例患者进行编号,以随机数字表法抽取20例为实验组,其余20例为对照组。实验组种植Ⅰ期手术时放置愈合基台同期行FGG。对照组种植Ⅰ期手术潜入式愈合,3个月Ⅱ期手术时放置愈合基台同期行FGG。术后观察移植物的存活情况,测量术前牙槽嵴顶剩余角化龈宽度,测量颊侧FGG后即刻、移植术后2个月、戴牙后即刻和戴牙后6个月的颊侧角化龈宽度,使用SPSS 20.0软件对移植物存活率、颊侧不同时间点角化龈宽度等进行统计分析,采用配对t检验进行比较,以P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组手术均获得成功,伤口正常愈合,组织瓣均存活。术前实验组和对照组牙槽嵴顶余留角化龈宽度分别为(2.9 ± 0.3)和(3.0 ± 0.3)mm,差异无统计学意义。实验组和对照组术后即刻种植体颊侧龈缘中点角化龈宽度分别为(4.9 ± 0.5)和(4.9 ± 0.5)mm,差异无统计学意义(t = 0.2,P = 0.8)。实验组和对照组术后2个月颊侧龈缘中点角化龈宽度分别为(4.2 ± 0.4)和(4.5 ± 0.4)mm,差异有统计学意义(t = -2.9,P<0.05)。实验组和对照组戴牙当天种植体颊侧龈缘中点角化龈宽度为(3.2± 0.4)和(3.7± 0.5)mm,差异有统计学意义(t = -2.6,P<0.05)。实验组和对照组戴牙后6个月种植体颊侧龈缘中点角化龈宽度为(3.1 ± 0.4)和(3.5 ± 0.3)mm,差异有统计学意义(t = -3.7,P<0.05)。

结论

当下颌后牙区剩余角化龈为2 ~ 4 mm时,FGG在种植Ⅰ期手术同期及Ⅱ期手术同期均能获得较好的增加角化龈的效果。相比于种植Ⅰ期手术同期进行FGG,Ⅱ期手术同期FGG能获得更好的颊侧角化龈的宽度,但会增加手术次数。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effect of peri-implant free gingival grafting (FGG) at different timing in the posterior mandible.

Methods

A total of 40 patients with keratinized gingival insufficiency (with a width of 2 to 4 mm) of a single missing tooth in the posterior mandibular area were selected from the Department of Implant Restoration, Dongguan Jianli Stomatological Hospital, from October 2018 to October 2020. The patients were randomly divided into experimental and control group. In the experimental group, the healing abutment was placed during the first-stage surgery and FGG was performed at the same time. In the control group, submerged healing was performed in the first-stage surgery, and in the second-stage surgery in 3 months, FGG was performed and the healing abutment was placed at the same time. The survival of the graft was observed after surgery. The width of the remaining keratinized gingiva on the alveolar ridge was measured before operation. The width of the buccal FGG immediately after the operation, the width of the keratinized gingiva in 2 months after transplantation, the keratinized gingiva immediately after crown delivery, and the width of the buccal keratinized gingiva 6 months after crown delivery were measured.

Results

The operations in both groups were successful. The wounds healed normally, and the tissue flaps survived. The width of the remaining keratinized gingiva on the alveolar crest of the experimental and control group before surgery were (2.9 ± 0.3) and (3.0 ± 0.3) mm, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The width of the keratinized gingiva measured at the midpoint of the buccal gingival margin of the experimental and control group immediately after surgery was (4.9 ± 0.5) and (4.9 ± 0.5) mm, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (t = 0.2, P = 0.8) . Besides, the width of the keratinized gingiva measured at the midpoint of the buccal gingival margin in 2 months after operation was (4.2 ± 0.4) and (4.5 ± 0.4) mm, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (t = -2.9, P<0.05) . In addition, the width of the keratinized gingiva at the midpoint of the buccal gingival margin of the implant measured on the day of crown delivery was (3.2 ± 0.4) and (3.7 ± 0.5) mm, and the difference was statistically significant (t = -2.6, P<0.05) . Moreover, the width of the keratinized gingiva at the midpoint of the buccal gingival margin of the implant measured in 6 months after teeth placement was (3.1 ± 0.4) and (3.5 ± 0.3) mm, and the difference was statistically significant (t = -3.7, P<0.05) .

Conclusions

When the width of the residual keratinized gingiva in the posterior mandibular area is 2 to 4 mm, FGG can achieve better effects of increasing keratinized gingiva at both the first- and second-stage surgery. Compared with the first-stage surgery, FGG performed at the second-stage surgery can achieve higher width of the buccal keratinized gingiva, the drawback of more operations.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较(例)
表2 两组患者游离龈移植后颊侧龈缘中点角化龈宽度各时间点的比较(mm,±s
图1 种植Ⅰ期手术同期游离龈移植(FGG)典型病例治疗前、后的口内照 A:术前颊面观;B:术前颌面观;C ~ D:种植Ⅰ、Ⅱ期手术后游离龈的固定(颊面观和颌面观);E ~ F:FGG后2个月(颊面观和颌面观);G:戴牙后即刻;H:戴牙后6个月复查。
图2 种植Ⅱ期手术同期游离龈移植(FGG)典型病例治疗前、后的口内照 A:术前颊面观;B:术前颌面观;C:Ⅱ期手术后颊侧半厚瓣的制备;D:游离龈的固定(颊面观);E:FGG后2个月(颊面观);F:FGG后2个月(颌面观);G:戴牙后即刻;H:戴牙后6个月复查。
[1]
Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA,et al. Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery:A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Investig201620(7):1369-1387. DOI:10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2.
[2]
Gamborena I, Avila-Ortiz G. Peri-implant marginal mucosa defects:Classification and clinical management[J]. J Periodontol202192(7):947-957. DOI:10.1002/JPER.20-0519.
[3]
Chackartchi T, Romanos GE, Sculean A. Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants[J]. Periodontol 20002019,81(1):124-138. DOI:10.1111/prd.12287.
[4]
Lin CY, Chen ZZ, Pan WL,et al. Impact of timing on soft tissue augmentation during implant treatment:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res201829(5):508-521. DOI:10.1111/clr.13148.
[5]
Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM,et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions:Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions[J]. J Periodontol201889(Suppl 1):S237-S248. DOI:10.1002/JPER.17-0733.
[6]
杨雨虹,李歆,邓永强.种植体周围软组织临床意义及软组织不足的防治[J/OL].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)202115(5):272-277. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2021.05.003.
[7]
Perussolo J, Souza AB, Matarazzo F,et al. Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri-implant tissues and brushing discomfort:A 4-year follow-up study[J]. Clin Oral Implant Res201829(12):1177-1185. DOI:10.1111/clr.13381.
[8]
Cairo F, Barbato L, Tonelli P,et al. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graftfor buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized,controlled clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol201744(7):769-776. DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12750.
[9]
児玉利朗. インプラント治療におけるソフトティッシュマネージメント[J].歯先技研会誌201319:10-14.
[10]
黄江勇,李婵秀,钟梅,等.游离角化龈移植在下颌后牙单颗及连续种植区的应用[J].广东医学201940(2):224-227. DOI:10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20184853.
[11]
胡琳驰,黄温棉,王仁飞.改良游离牙龈移植技术临床效果评价[J].上海口腔医学201928(1):76-80. DOI:10.19438/j.sjos.2019.01.015.
[12]
乔敏,张凯,董静,等.游离龈移植术和根向复位瓣增加种植区域角化龈效果的临床观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志201651(10):605-609. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2016.10.007.
[13]
Han TJ, Takei HH, Carranza FA. The strip gingival autograft technique[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent199313(2):180-187.
[14]
Urban IA.垂直向和水平向牙槽嵴骨增量[M].黄權,张鹏,马开宇,等,译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2018:70-70.
[1] 余晓宁, 蔡洁琛, 陈小红. 翻瓣与不翻瓣种植手术疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 370-377.
[2] 田陶然, 张陶. 数字化虚拟手术设计在口腔种植临床前教学中的应用展望[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 189-193.
[3] 杨雨虹, 李歆, 邓永强. 种植体周围软组织临床意义及软组织不足的防治[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 272-277.
[4] 李鹤佳, 朱杨, 李德超, 唐杰, 牟佳媛. 解释结构模型分析口腔种植学网络教学模式的效果[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(03): 220-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要