切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2007, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 105 -108. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2007.02.012

临床研究

面罩前方牵引治疗骨性Ⅲ类错 中上颌骨与下颌颏部变化的分析
许潾于1,, 张端强1, 许慧琴2, 邱雄文3   
  1. 1.350002 福州,福建医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科
    2.350002 福州,闽清县精神病医院
    3.350002 福州,龙岩市第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2007-02-08 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 许潾于

Effect of face mask maxillary protraction on maxilla and mandibula mental region in class Ⅲ malocclusion

Lin-yu XU1,, Duan-qiang ZHANG1, Hui-qin XU1, Xiong-wen QIU1   

  1. 1.School of Stomotology,Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2007-02-08 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Lin-yu XU
引用本文:

许潾于, 张端强, 许慧琴, 邱雄文. 面罩前方牵引治疗骨性Ⅲ类错 中上颌骨与下颌颏部变化的分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2007, 01(02): 105-108.

Lin-yu XU, Duan-qiang ZHANG, Hui-qin XU, Xiong-wen QIU. Effect of face mask maxillary protraction on maxilla and mandibula mental region in class Ⅲ malocclusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2007, 01(02): 105-108.

目的

研究面罩式前方牵引联合快速扩弓治疗骨性Ⅲ类错 合牙 畸形及在调整磨牙近中关系中的作用,并对上颌“A”点的前移和下颌颏部变化在骨性Ⅲ类面型改善中的作用进行分析。

方法

随机选择17 例恒牙列早期(11.6 岁)骨性Ⅲ类错 合牙 患者,使用面罩式前方牵引结合上颌快速扩弓进行治疗,对患者治疗前、后头颅侧位片进行测量分析,使用配对t 检验对数据进行统计分析。

结果

上颌骨“A”点平均前移3.41±1.63 mm,治疗前后有统计学意义。 而代表下颌颏部突缩的Y 轴角的变化则无统计学意义。上颌骨“A”的变化与Y 轴角呈负相关关系。

结论

面罩式前方牵引对骨性Ⅲ类错 合牙 畸形面型改善是通过上颌骨“A”点的前移和下颌平面顺时针旋转共同作用的结果,是一个协调的过程。 在调整Ⅲ类磨牙关系中,前牵引引起上颌磨牙的近中移动和垂直向的伸长起决定作用。

Objective

To investigate the skeletal fuction of face mask maxillary protraction combined with rapid maxillary expansion(RME) and its effect on correction of molar relationship examine the effect of the forward movement of maxillary “A” point and the rotation of mandibular mental region on the profile of class Ⅲmalocclusion.

Methods

Seventeen subjects in early permanent dentition with anterior cross bite treated by face mask and RME were included. Cephalometric radiographs were taken before treatment and after treatment for analysis. Twenty three items were included in the cephalometrics.Paired student t-test was performed to analyze the data.

Results

Maxillary “A” point was measured moving forward by 3.41±1.63 mm,whereas no significant change in Y axis which stood for the prominence of the mental region was observed. The change in A point was negatively related to the Y axis.

Conclusion

Forward movement of maxilla and mandibular clockwise rotation account for the major profile improvement. Mesial movement and the extrusion of the upper molar play an pivotal role in molar relation correction.

表1 治疗前后骨骼和牙齿的变化
项目 治疗前(T1)xˉ± 治疗后(T2)xˉ± T1-T2
SNA 81.46±2.94 83.48±2.44 -2.02±1.61 0.001
SNB 83.12±2.96 81.29±2.75 1.83±1.98 0.008
ANB -1.67±1.66 2.19±1.76 -3.86±0.89 0.000
MP-SN 34.24±3.07 36.50±5.36 -2.28±2.22 0.004
MP-FH 29.45±3.19 30.85±6.27 -1.40±2.33 0.062
OP-FH 9.91±5.36 9.60±4.93 0.32±3.22 0.740
PP-FH 4.10±3.52 3.68±3.76 0.42±2.22 0.530
NA-PA -2.29±4.61 3.81±3.19 -6.11±2.68 0.000
Y角 63.66±2.99 64.40±4.50 -0.80±3.50 0.446
Ptm-A 43.60±2.41 47.01±2.58 -3.41±1.63 0.000
Ptm-S 16.80±1.71 17.76±2.52 -0.95±2.18 0.158
S-Ar-Go 141.73±8.51 143.72±8.83 -1.99±4.27 0.135
N-ANS 53.92±2.57 55.10±2.34 -1.18±2.45 0.123
N-Me 115.99±4.25 122.43±6.69 -6.43±3.30 0.000
-SN 107.50±8.94 105.05±5.03 2.44±3.62 0.381
-NB 25.00±5.51 20.37±4.89 4.62±5.83 0.019*
-MP 87.80±4.54 82.97±5.52 4.82±5.32 0.009
U6-PP 46.15±2.38 50.95±3.46 -4.80±2.23 0.000
L6-MP 28.91±2.03 30.29±2.89 -1.37±1.63 0.014*
U6-s' 27.90±5.22 34.64±4.22 -6.73±4.08 0.000
U1-s' 62.85±4.43 67.51±4.31 -4.69±4.13 0.002
L6-pg 38.50±1.71 39.00±2.32 -0.50±0.37 0.235
Overjut -3.02±2.02 2.38±0.74 -5.40±1.62 0.000
S-N'-Sn 88.01±1.78 88.85±2.24 -0.83±1.69 0.116
S-N'-B' 86.88±3.07 84.83±2.61 2.05±2.28 0.010*
Sn-N'-B' 1.17±2.61 4.06±1.91 -2.90±2.28 0.001
Ns-Sn-Pos 176.39±6.78 171.37±4.67 5.01±3.91 0.001
1
Williams M, Sarver D, Sadowsky P,et al. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of class Ⅲmalocclusions in growing children: A prospective long-term study. Semi orthod, 1997,4(3):265-274.
2
Guyer E, Ellis E, McNamara J, et al. Components of ClassⅢMalocclusion in Juveniles and Adolescents. Angle Orthod,1986,56(1):7-30.
3
曾祥龙. 前牙反颅面生长发育的X 线头影测量研究. 中华口腔医学杂志, 1986,21(1):8-12.
4
江久汇,纪昌蓉. 联合应用上颌前方牵引与快速扩弓对恒牙早期安氏Ⅲ类错颌骨硬组织的作用. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2001,36(3):273-276.
5
Kyung-Suk Cha. Skeletal Changes of Maxillary Protraction in Patients Exhibiting Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion:A Comparison of Three Skeletal Maturation Groups.Angle Orthod, 2003,73(1):26-35.
6
Baik HS. Clinical results of maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995,108 (6):583-592.
7
Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004,126(5):555-568.
8
Richard Lowy. Maxillary protraction and mandibular retraction.International Journal of Orthodontia and Dentistry for Children, 1934,20(12):1173-1177.
9
Macdonald K, Kapust A, Turley P. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on classⅢmalocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999,116(1):13-24.
11
Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA, et al. Shapecoordinate analysis of skeletal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,114(4):418-426.
12
Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class Ⅲ children:A comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 113(2):204-212.
13
Gallagher RW,Miranda F,Buschang P.Maxillary protraction: Treatment and posttreatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,113(6):612-619.
14
Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, et al. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996,109(1):38-49.
15
Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Longitudial growth changes in the sagittal relationship of maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995,107(1):79-90.
16
Shanker S, Ngan P, Wade D, et al. Cephalometric A point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion.AJO, 1996,110(4):423-430.
[1] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[2] 肖琦钦, 赵文丽, 任明君, 林丽丽, 刘尧, 苏展. 我国颞下颌关节专业学位论文的发展及演进分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 250-256.
[3] 张明欣, 马艳宁, 金作林. 隐形功能矫治在青少年骨性Ⅱ类下颌后缩患者治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-64.
[4] 吴家顺, 孙伟, 曾国忠, 申仪, 郑广森, 唐海阔. 下颌第三磨牙拔除术中下牙槽神经损伤的原因、临床评估与预防[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 394-399.
[5] 李圣鹏, 方爱蓝, 刘诗宁, 王丹, 刘湘奇. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度的预测因素与评估方法[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 441-445.
[6] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[7] 蓝凯文, 孙玥, 江柳霖, 阎英. 口腔修复临床诊疗中口颌系统功能评估的数字化实现[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 265-271.
[8] 梁潇, 黄绍农, 赵聚钊, 陈志聪, 朱耀旻, 王昱萌. 右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因局部浸润对颞下颌关节术后疼痛及恶心呕吐的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 49-54.
[9] 欧发荣, 廖贵清, 纪焕中, 张深榕, 苏凯. 下颌骨转移性成釉细胞瘤伴右颌下区淋巴结转移一例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 309-312.
[10] 狄耀云, 孙英媛. 无托槽隐形矫治骨性Ⅱ类错HE畸形的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 294-301.
[11] 孙智雯, 潘彦君, 林天卫, 卢红飞, 艾虹, 麦志辉. 隐形功能矫治器导下颌向前治疗骨性Ⅱ类安氏Ⅱ类1分类青少年错HE的头影测量研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 287-293.
[12] 陈亦阳, 刘佳玉, 万全, 卢志远, 高梓君, 刘佳梦. 半侧颜面短小畸形患儿非病变侧下颌骨形态改变特点[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 234-240.
[13] 程钰迅, 刘旭琳, 金作林, 秦文. 骨性Ⅱ类错非对称拔牙掩饰性正畸治疗一例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 174-179.
[14] 陈曦, 朱雯雯, 张容慈, 吴明乐, 沈山. 形态学和功能性磁共振成像在颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断方面的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 155-159.
[15] 张靖, 王奇. 一例下颌骨动静脉畸形的栓塞治疗[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 392-392.
阅读次数
全文


摘要