切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 96 -103. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2025.02.003

论著

口腔环境对基于共振频率分析种植修复螺丝稳定性的影响
郭珈而1, 王晓露2, 刘志鑫1, 周建英3, 王琳1,()   
  1. 1. 中山大学附属口腔医院,光华口腔医学院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室,广东省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,广州 510055
    2. 广东省传感技术与生物医疗仪器重点实验室,中山大学生物医学工程学院,广州 510006
    3. 光电材料与技术国家重点实验室,中山大学物理学院,广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-30 出版日期:2025-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王琳
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划(201803010099)

Influence of the oral environment on the stability of prosthetic screws based on resonance frequency analysis

Jiaer Guo1, Xiaolu Wang2, Zhixin Liu1, Jianying Zhou3, Lin Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Hospital of Stomatology,Guanghua School of Stomatology,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center of Oral Diseases,Guangzhou 510055,China
    2. Key Laboratory of Sensing Technology and Biomedical Instrument of Guangdong Province,School of Biomedical Engineering,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006,China
    3. State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials & Technology,School of Physics,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China
  • Received:2024-11-30 Published:2025-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Lin Wang
引用本文:

郭珈而, 王晓露, 刘志鑫, 周建英, 王琳. 口腔环境对基于共振频率分析种植修复螺丝稳定性的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 96-103.

Jiaer Guo, Xiaolu Wang, Zhixin Liu, Jianying Zhou, Lin Wang. Influence of the oral environment on the stability of prosthetic screws based on resonance frequency analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 96-103.

目的

探讨唾液及共鸣腔对基于共振频率分析种植义齿修复螺丝稳定性的影响。

方法

修复下颌牙列缺失的6个种植体联合支持螺丝固位义齿作为模型,以置于普通室内环境为对照组,以置于仿头模内人工唾液湿润模拟的口腔环境为研究组,使用数显扭矩扳手调整不同位置修复螺丝的预紧扭矩,形成与修复螺丝稳定性关联的参数矩阵,予以振动激发并采集相关声振信号加以处理,获取对应共振频率,绘制时频图,计算两组各修复螺丝在15 N·cm 时的共振频率及变异系数。应用Bland-Altman 一致性分析法评估两组各修复螺丝稳定性相关共振频率的一致性,应用Pearson相关性分析探讨两组各修复螺丝稳定性与相应共振频率的关系(α=0.05)。

结果

时频图结果显示,两组均在7 ~9 kHz 频道范围内出现能量集中带,且随着扭矩值降低,能量集中带出现左移。变异系数结果显示,实验组各修复螺丝在15 N·cm时共振频率介于(7 329±8)~(8 400±8)Hz,变异系数为0.001 ~0.002。对照组各修复螺丝在15 N·cm时共振频率介于(7 329±6)~(8 463±11)Hz,变异系数为0.000 8 ~0.002。Pearson相关性分析结果表明,两组各修复螺丝稳定性与共振频率均呈线性正相关(r=0.483 ~0.937,P<0.001),且同一修复螺丝的相关系数值相近。Bland-Altman一致性分析结果显示,实验组归一化后的共振频率介于0.569 ~0.892,对照组归一化后的共振频率介于0.585 ~0.881,两组的共振频率差异无统计学意义(t=-1.816 ~0.859,P>0.05),差值绝对值为0.001 ~0.016。

结论

湿润和共鸣的口腔环境未对基于叩诊的种植义齿声振特征分析产生不利影响,以共振频率反映修复螺丝稳定性具有良好的临床应用前景。

Objective

To explore the impact of saliva and resonance cavities on the stability of prosthetic screws based on resonance frequency analysis.

Methods

Mandibular edentulous gypsum casts with screw-retained definitive fixed dental prostheses supported by 6 implants were used.The control group was placed in a standard indoor environment,while the experimental group was placed in a simulated oral environment with artificial saliva in a dental manikin.Different insertion torques were applied to the screws using a digital torque wrench,forming a parameter matrix related to screw stability.A tapping simulation was directly applied to the buccal side of the tested screw,and a pickup device was used to collect the acoustic signals.The resonance peak frequencies of these signals were extracted by using time-frequencydomain analysis based on short-time Fourier transform.The spectrograms of acoustic signal were plotted,and the coefficients of variation for each prosthetic screw at 15 N·cm were calculated for both groups.Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the consistency of the resonance frequencies related to prosthetic screw stability in both groups.Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between prosthetic screw stability and corresponding resonance frequencies(α = 0.05).

Results

The spectrograms of acoustic signal showed that both groups had energy concentration bands in the 7 to 9 kHz range,and as the insertion torque value decreased,the energy concentration band shifted left.The coefficient of variation results indicated that the resonance frequencies of the prosthetic screws in the experimental group at 15 N·cm ranged from(7 329±8)Hz to(8 400±8)Hz,with coefficients of variation ranging from 0.001 to 0.002.In the control group,the resonance frequencies ranged from(7 329±6)Hz to(8 463±11)Hz,with coefficients of variation ranging from 0.000 8 to 0.002.Pearson correlation analysis showed that a linear positive correlation between screw stability and resonance frequency in both groups(r=0.483 ~0.937,P<0.001)and the correlation coefficient values for the same screw were similar.Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the normalized resonance frequencies in the experimental group ranged from 0.569 to 0.892,while those in the control group ranged from 0.585 to 0.881.The differences in resonance frequencies between the two groups were not statistically significant(t=-1.816 ~0.859,P>0.05),with the absolute difference ranging from 0.001 to 0.016.

Conclusions

The moist and resonant oral environment did not have an adverse effect on the acoustic-vibration characteristics of implant prostheses based on tapping.Acoustic resonance frequency analysis showed good clinical prospects for reflecting the stability of the prosthetic screw.

图1 室温下的带螺丝固位最终修复体的体外模型(对照组) A ~F:修复螺丝从左至右编号。
图2 将对照组模型放置于仿头模内并滴加人工唾液(实验组)
图3 声振信号采集及处理流程图 A:信号采集示意图(左)和实物图(右),蓝色方框为振动激发装置,红色方框为信号采集装置;B:分帧加窗示意图,右图为左图黑色方框放大图;C:短时快速傅里叶变换所输出的时频图,右图为左图黑色方框中所选取频带对应的能量峰值示意图。
图4 修复螺丝A在不同扭矩情况下的声振信号时频图 A:对照组;B:实验组;黑色方框为具有特征的能量集中区域。
表1 实验组和对照组A~F修复螺丝15 N·cm的共振频率及变异系数
表2 修复螺丝A ~F在不同检测环境下分析获得的共振频率的一致性分析结果
图5 修复螺丝在不同检测环境下分析获得的共振频率的Bland-Altman图 A~F:分别为修复螺丝A~F。
图6 不同检测环境下修复螺丝的扭矩与共振频率的相关性分析结果 A~F:分别为修复螺丝A~F。
[1]
Chen J,Guo J,Yang L,et al.Effect of different implant angulations on the biomechanical performance of prosthetic screws in two implant-supported,screw-retained prostheses:A numerical and experimental study[J].J Prosthet Dent,2023,130(2):240.e1-240.e10.DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.004.
[2]
Stavropoulos A,Bertl K,Eren S,et al.Mechanical and biological complications after implantoplasty:A systematic review[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2019,30(9):833-848.DOI:10.1111/clr.13499.
[3]
Papaspyridakos P,Bordin TB,Kim YJ,et al.Technical complications and prosthesis survival rates with implant -supported fixed complete dental prostheses:A retrospective study with 1- to 12-year follow-up[J].J Prosthodont,2020,29(1):3-11.DOI:10.1111/jopr.13119.
[4]
李瑾,行鸿彦,吴叶丽,等.基于敲击声音信号的墙体内管道探测方法[J].国外电子测量技术,2022,41(2):1-6.DOI:10.19652/j.cnki.femt.2103310.
[5]
邬冠华,林俊明,任吉林,等.声振检测方法的发展[J].无损检测,2011,33(2):35-41.
[6]
Lu SL,Wang XX,He QB,et al.Fault diagnosis of motor bearing with speed fluctuation via angular resampling of transient sound signals[J].J Sound Vibration,2016,385:16-32.DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2016.09.012.
[7]
Hassani S,Mousavi M,Gandomi AH.Structural health monitoring in composite structures:A comprehensive review[J].Sensors(Basel),2021,22(1):153.DOI:10.3390/s22010153.
[8]
White C,Whittingham B,Li H,et al.Health assessment of bonded composite repairs with frequency response techniques[J].Smart Structures,Devices,and Systems Ⅲ,2007:6414.DOI:10.1117/12.695642.
[9]
刘永超.基于振动声学的螺栓疲劳开裂检测方法[J].制造技术与机床,2022(8):142-148.DOI:10.19287/j.mtmt.1005-2402.2022.08.022.
[10]
Hanses G,Smedberg JI,Nilner K.Analysis of a device for assessment of abutment and prosthesis screw loosening in oral implants[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2002,13(6):666-670.DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130614.x.
[11]
Miyashita M,Ogawa T,Naito H,et al.Evaluation of implant screw loosening by resonance frequency analysis with triaxial piezoelectric pick-up:In vitro model and in vivo animal study[J].Clin Oral Investig,2018,22(5):2129-2134.DOI:10.1007/s00784-018-2467-1.
[12]
Guo J,Wang X,Liu Z,et al.Acoustic resonance frequency analysis for evaluating prosthetic screw stability in splinted implant-supported fixed dental prostheses:An in vitro study[J].J Prosthet Dent,2025,133(2):542.e1-542.e9.DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.028.
[13]
杨西荣,胡佳乔.纯钛、纯锆在模拟口腔唾液中的腐蚀行为研究[J].热加工工艺,2021,50(18):69-73+78.DOI:10.14158/j.cnki.1001-3814.20173324.
[14]
Rereddy SK,Cao AC,Blackwell B,et al.Rheology of saliva in health and disease[J].Biorheology,2023,59(1-2):19-27.DOI:10.3233/bir-210014.
[15]
de Souza Marinho D,Rocha Pinto F,Baptista ER.Piezoelectric effect as an energy generator:A describal historic of its performance[J].International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science,2019,6(11):228-232.DOI:10.22161/ijaers.611.35.
[1] 陈胤熹, 李辉. 异常股骨前倾角的生物力学研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 778-784.
[2] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[3] 高小康, 张净宇, 刘金伟, 田东牧, 胡永成, 徐卫国. 连接型人工膝关节假体运动和负重模式的演变和进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 505-516.
[4] 肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[5] 皮颖, 王高, 张强, 黄志荣. 年轻患者初次髋关节置换术后关节翻修的原因分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 430-434.
[6] 李翊甄, 卢嘉蕊, 张晓磊. 椅旁计算机辅助设计与制作技术应用于根管治疗后牙体修复的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 272-278.
[7] 李秋兰, 李希庭, 王晓东. 数字化技术引导下的美学修复一例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 260-264.
[8] 王冬怡, 戴沄, 尹欣萍, 孟佳丽, 吴国锋. 可摘局部义齿卡环固位力测量系统的研制及其初步效果评价[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 197-202.
[9] 郑希彦, 吴润鹏, 杜飞, 谢玉芬, 王平根, 张广权, 翟航, 何函樨, 李瑞曦. 基于生信分析SLC29A3 在肝癌中的表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 290-295.
[10] 陈逍堃, 竺枫, 何信坤, 包丞州, 阮健. 同种异体肌腱双束重建肘关节外侧韧带治疗肘关节慢性后外侧旋转不稳定的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 140-146.
[11] 梁雪琴, 李娜, 潘芳芳, 张香玉, 段亚男. tDCS结合肌电生物反馈对脑梗死后偏瘫老年患者肢体功能、运动功能和动态姿势稳定性的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 90-96.
[12] 朱菡, 卓士超, 吴迪, 朱雅楠, 韩佳欣. 术前血浆纤维蛋白原、血脂水平及MMR表达与结直肠癌病理特点及预后的相关性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 141-145.
[13] 高尔涵, 张硕, 齐岩松, 王一帆. 3D打印个别托盘在全口义齿修复中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 255-259.
[14] 项玉梅, 许少睿, 孔杰, 张金美, 李晗. 线性上升速率对导管头端不稳定状态下行数字减影血管造影的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 161-165.
[15] 陈绚, 欧宁江, 叶洁梅, 邓瑾倩. 纤维蛋白原β链启动因子基因多态性与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块稳定性的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-39.
阅读次数
全文


摘要