切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 195 -199. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2024.03.009

综述

言语治疗结合经颅磁刺激用于腭裂言语障碍康复的可行性分析
杨林瑞1, 陈仁吉1,()   
  1. 1. 首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院口腔颌面整形创伤科,北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-04 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 陈仁吉

The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech therapy in rehabilitation of cleft palate speech disorders

Linrui Yang1, Renji Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Traumatic Surgery, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2024-02-04 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Renji Chen
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Beijing(7212046)
引用本文:

杨林瑞, 陈仁吉. 言语治疗结合经颅磁刺激用于腭裂言语障碍康复的可行性分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 195-199.

Linrui Yang, Renji Chen. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech therapy in rehabilitation of cleft palate speech disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 195-199.

腭裂言语障碍(CPSD)发病率较高,严重影响患者的交流及生活质量。以往的研究认为,其特殊语音主要是由于患者固有的解剖学缺陷,但神经影像学检查发现异常的代偿性发音习惯可能源自患者的大脑结构及相关功能网络异常。这一发现可以作为重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗CPSD的理论依据。rTMS的作用方式是通过一定频率的磁脉冲作用于大脑皮层的特定区域,改变相关脑区的神经兴奋性,并使大脑产生神经可塑性变化,从而重新调整语言网络。因此,rTMS在许多语言和言语相关疾病的康复治疗中起重要的辅助作用。本综述首先总结了CPSD的特点及其神经影像学机制、言语治疗的神经影像学原理,以及经颅磁刺激的原理及其在言语康复中的应用,然后综合上述理论探索言语治疗结合重复经颅磁刺激治疗CPSD的可行性,以期为CPSD患者的康复治疗提供一种全新的手段,并为CPSD康复治疗方案的制定提供新的理论依据。

The incidence of cleft palate speech disorders (CPSD) is relatively high, which seriously affects patients′ communication and quality of life. Previous studies revealed that the phonological features are mainly due to the patients′ anatomical defects, but neuroimaging examinations found that compensatory pronunciation may originate from abnormalities in the patients′ brain structure and functional networks. This finding could be theoretical basis for the treatment of CPSD with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) . The mechanism of rTMS is to adopt magnetic pulses with certain frequency on specific regions of brain, thus changing the neural excitability of relevant brain areas and causing neuroplastic changes, thereby re-adjusting the language network. Therefore, rTMS plays an important auxiliary role in the rehabilitation treatment of many language and speech-related diseases. Our review summarized the characteristics and neuroimaging mechanism of cleft palate speech disorder, speech therapy, and transcranial magnetic stimulation and its application in speech rehabilitation. Then we explored the feasibility of the cranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech therapy in treatment of cleft palate speech disorder, hoping to provide a new theoretical basis and method of rehabilitation treatment for patients with cleft palate speech disorder.

[1]
Dixon MJMarazita MLBeaty TH,et al. Cleft lip and palate:Understanding genetic and environmental influences[J]. Nat Rev Genet201112(3):167-178. DOI:10.1038/nrg2933.
[2]
Murthy JBhaskar L. Current concepts in genetics of nonsyndromic clefts[J]. Indian J Plast Surg200942(1):68-81. DOI:10.4103/0970-0358.53004.
[3]
Devolder IRichman LConrad AL,et al. Abnormal cerebellar structure is dependent on phenotype of isolated cleft of the lip and/or palate[J]. Cerebellum201312(2):236-244. DOI:10.1007/s12311-012-0418-y.
[4]
Ruiter JSKorsten-Meijer AGGoorhuis-Brouwer SM. Communicative abilities in toddlers and in early school age children with cleft palate[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol200973(5):693-698. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.01.006.
[5]
Bishop DVMSnowling MJThompson PA,et al. Phase 2 of CATALISE:A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development:Terminology[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry201758(10):1068-1080. DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12721.
[6]
Taib BGTaib AGSwift AC,et al. Cleft lip and palate:Diagnosis and management[J]. Br J Hosp Med(Lond)201576(10):584-585,588-591. DOI:10.12968/hmed.2015.76.10.584.
[7]
Sell DSouthby LWren Y,et al. Centre-level variation in speech outcome and interventions,and factors associated with poor speech outcomes in 5-year-old children with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate:The Cleft Care UK study. Part 4 [J]. Orthod Craniofac Res201720(Suppl 2):27-39. DOI:10.1111/ocr.12186.
[8]
Nopoulos PBerg SCanady J,et al. Structural brain abnormalities in adult males with clefts of the lip and/or palate[J]. Genet Med20024(1):1-9. DOI:10.1097/00125817-200201000-00001.
[9]
Nopoulos PBerg SVandemark D,et al. Increased incidence of a midline brain anomaly in patients with nonsyndromic clefts of the lip and/or palate[J]. J Neuroimaging200111(4):418-424. DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2001.tb00072.x.
[10]
Nopoulos PLangbehn DRCanady J,et al. Abnormal brain structure in children with isolated clefts of the lip or palate[J]. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med2007161(8):753-758. DOI:10.1001/archpedi.161.8.753.
[11]
Adamson CLAnderson VANopoulos P,et al. Regional brain morphometric characteristics of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate [J]. Dev Neurosci201436(6):490-498. DOI:10.1159/000365389.
[12]
Becker DBCoalson RSSachanandani NS,et al. Functional neuroanatomy of lexical processing in children with cleft lip and palate[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg2008122(5):1371-1382. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181881f54.
[13]
Zhang WLi CChen L,et al. Increased activation of the hippocampus during a Chinese character subvocalization task in adults with cleft lip and palate palatoplasty and speech therapy [J]. Neuroreport201728(12):739-744. DOI:10.1097/wnr.0000000000000832.
[14]
Maas ERobin DAAustermann Hula SN,et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol200817(3):277-298. DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025).
[15]
Sun LZhang WWang M,et al. Reading-related brain function restored to normal after articulation training in patients with cleft lip and palate:An fMRI study[J]. Neurosci Bull202238(10):1215-1228. DOI:10.1007/s12264-022-00918-6.
[16]
Szaflarski JPGriffis JVannest J,et al. A feasibility study of combined intermittent theta burst stimulation and modified constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic post-stroke aphasia [J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci201836(4):503-518. DOI:10.3233/rnn-180812.
[17]
Zhang HChen YHu R,et al. rTMS treatments combined with speech training for a conduction aphasia patient:A case report with MRI study[J]. Medicine(Baltimore)201796(32):e7399. DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000007399.
[18]
Zhao XLi YTian Q,et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and decreases interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α in elderly patients with refractory depression[J]. J Int Med Res201947(5):1848-1855. DOI:10.1177/0300060518817417.
[19]
Rothwell JC. Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex[J]. J Neurosci Methods199774(2):113-122. DOI:10.1016/s0165-0270(97)02242-5.
[20]
Pascual-Leone ATormos JMKeenan J,et al. Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol199815(4):333-343. DOI:10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005.
[21]
Maeda FKeenan JPTormos JM,et al. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation[J]. Clin Neurophysiol2000111(5):800-805. DOI:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00323-5.
[22]
窦云龙,张莹莹,雍曾花,等.超低频经颅磁刺激联合康复训练对孤独症谱系障碍儿童的疗效[J].中国康复201833(5):399-401. DOI:10.3870/zgkf.2018.05.013.
[23]
武娟利,孙艳萍.多媒体感觉及言语训练联合经颅磁刺激对孤独症谱系语言障碍儿童的影响[J].海南医学202132(1):57-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2021.01.015.
[24]
石彦桦,朱振杰.重复经颅磁刺激联合言语治疗对儿童语言发育迟缓效果观察[J].交通医学202135(5):521-522+524. DOI:10.19767/j.cnki.32-1412.2021.05.027.
[25]
黄小莉.言语训练结合经颅磁刺激用于儿童语言发育迟缓中的有效性分析[J].名医2022(5):27-29.
[26]
林陵,袁兰英.重复经颅磁刺激联合言语训练治疗儿童语言发育迟缓的效果及对患儿行为与认知的影响[J].临床医学工程202027(5):545-546. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2020.05.0545.
[27]
Hu XYZhang TRajah GB,et al. Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia:A randomized,sham-controlled study [J]. Neurol Res201840(6):459-465. DOI:10.1080/01616412.2018.1453980.
[28]
Sebastianelli LVersace VMartignago S,et al. Low-frequency rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients:A systematic review[J]. Acta Neurol Scand2017136(6):585-605. DOI:10.1111/ane.12773.
[29]
Barwood CHMurdoch BERiek S,et al. Long term language recovery subsequent to low frequency rTMS in chronic non-fluent aphasia[J]. NeuroRehabilitation201332(4):915-928. DOI:10.3233/nre-130915.
[30]
Thiel AHartmann ARubi-Fessen I,et al. Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on language networks and recovery in early poststroke aphasia[J]. Stroke201344(8):2240-2246. DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.111.000574.
[31]
Rubi-Fessen IHartmann AHuber W,et al. Add-on effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on subacute aphasia therapy:Enhanced improvement of functional communication and basic linguistic skills. A randomized controlled study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil201596(11):1935-1944.e2. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.017.
[32]
Szaflarski JPAllendorfer JBBanks C,et al. Recovered vs. not-recovered from post-stroke aphasia:The contributions from the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres[J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci201331(4):347-360. DOI:10.3233/rnn-120267.
[33]
Berube SHillis AE. Advances and innovations in aphasia treatment trials[J]. Stroke201950(10):2977-2984. DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.119.025290.
[34]
Naeser MAMartin PINicholas M,et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca′s area:An open-protocol study[J]. Brain Lang200593(1):95-105. DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.004.
[35]
Cappa SFSandrini MRossini PM,et al. The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming:rTMS evidence[J]. Neurology200259(5):720-723. DOI:10.1212/wnl.59.5.720.
[36]
Cotelli MManenti RRosini S,et al. Action and object naming in physiological aging:An rTMS study[J]. Front Aging Neurosci20102:151. DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2010.00151.
[37]
Balossier AEtard ODescat C,et al. Epidural electrical stimulation for the treatment of chronic poststroke aphasia:Still compulsory 6 years later![J]. Br J Neurosurg201327(2):246-248. DOI:10.3109/02688697.2012.722241.
[38]
Cotelli MManenti RAlberici A,et al. Prefrontal cortex rTMS enhances action naming in progressive non-fluent aphasia[J]. Eur J Neurol201219(11):1404-1412. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03699.x.
[39]
Cotelli MManenti RCappa SF,et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves naming in Alzheimer disease patients at different stages of cognitive decline[J]. Eur J Neurol200815(12):1286-1292. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02202.x.
[40]
Wu HGe YTang H,et al. Language modulates brain activity underlying representation of kinship terms[J]. Sci Rep20155:18473. DOI:10.1038/srep18473.
[41]
Gao QWang JYu C,et al. Effect of handedness on brain activity patterns and effective connectivity network during the semantic task of Chinese characters[J]. Sci Rep20155:18262. DOI:10.1038/srep18262.
[42]
Lotze MSeggewies GErb M,et al. The representation of articulation in the primary sensorimotor cortex[J]. Neuroreport200011(13):2985-2989. DOI:10.1097/00001756-200009110-00032.
[43]
Alario FXChainay HLehericy S,et al. The role of the supplementary motor area(SMA)in word production[J]. Brain Res20061076(1):129-143. DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.104.
[44]
Callan DEKawato MParsons L,et al. Speech and song:The role of the cerebellum[J]. Cerebellum20076(4):321-327. DOI:10.1080/14734220601187733.
[45]
Booth JRLu DBurman DD,et al. Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading [J]. Brain Res20061071(1):197-207. DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.097.
[46]
Tan LHLiu HLPerfetti CA,et al. The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading[J]. NeuroImage200113(5):836-846. DOI:10.1006/nimg.2001.0749.
[47]
Friederici AD. The cortical language circuit:From auditory perception to sentence comprehension[J]. Trends Cogn Sci201216(5):262-268. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.001.
[48]
Geranmayeh FBrownsett SLWise RJ. Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients:What is driving recovery?[J]. Brain2014137(Pt 10):2632-2648. DOI:10.1093/brain/awu163.
[49]
van Hees SMcMahon KAngwin A,et al. Neural activity associated with semantic versus phonological anomia treatments in aphasia[J]. Brain Lang2014129:47-57. DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.12.004.
[50]
Bonilha LRorden CFridriksson J. Assessing the clinical effect of residual cortical disconnection after ischemic strokes[J]. Stroke201445(4):988-993. DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.113.004137.
[51]
Crinion JHolland ALCopland DA,et al. Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research:Quantifying brain lesions after stroke [J]. NeuroImage201373:208-214. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.044.
[52]
Tavor IParker Jones OMars RB,et al. Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance [J]. Science2016352(6282):216-220. DOI:10.1126/science.aad8127.
[53]
Fine EJIonita CCLohr L. The history of the development of the cerebellar examination[J]. Semin Neurol200222(4):375-384. DOI:10.1055/s-2002-36759.
[54]
Harris RJRice GEYoung AW,et al. Distinct but overlapping patterns of response to words and faces in the fusiform gyrus[J]. Cereb Cortex201626(7):3161-3168. DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhv147.
[1] 张伟娜, 徐昊立. 基于监测的唇腭裂超声产前确诊情况分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 156-159.
[2] 杜美君, 曾妮, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 腭裂修复术的理论发展与技术改良:Sommerlad-Furlow改良腭裂整复技术[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-11.
[3] 陈泽华, 吴敏, 刘颖蒙, 龚彩霞, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 腭裂伤口延迟愈合规律的初期研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 45-48.
[4] 黄志毅, 赵娟. 重复经颅磁刺激联合分级运动想象训练对脑梗死后偏瘫患者运动功能及神经功能的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 102-107.
[5] 马良飞, 尹翎, 方婷, 曾西西, 佟佳璇, 马献昆. 重复经颅磁刺激联合虚拟现实技术对脑卒中后认知障碍的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 346-351.
[6] 杨钰琳, 常万鹏, 丁江涛, 徐红莉, 仵宵, 肖伯恒, 马丽虹. 重复经颅磁刺激对脑瘫患儿运动功能康复效果的Meta分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 327-334.
[7] 潘升超, 陈燕, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 重复经颅磁刺激技术在颅脑外伤康复中的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 118-123.
[8] 邓艳媚, 龙耀斌, 李鑫, 莫丽华. 经颅磁刺激结合前庭康复训练对ADHD患儿注意力缺陷的影响及临床机制[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 34-38.
[9] 潘惠, 王明, 杨忠, 杜向东. 低频重复经颅磁刺激辅助治疗伴不同特征抑郁症的对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 562-568.
[10] 黄爱茹, 付婧, 余茜. 多模块3D虚拟现实技术联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后认知功能障碍的效果[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1089-1095.
[11] 杨轩, 石晴, 邱海斌, 黄强. 重复经颅磁刺激联合艾司唑仑对脑卒中失眠患者的疗效及其对血清细胞因子和神经递质的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 395-399.
[12] 刘澳, 周菁, 孙永兵, 和俊雅, 林新贝, 乔琦, 李中林, 张建成, 武肖玲, 邹智, 胡扬喜, 肖新广, 吕雪, 李昊, 李永丽. 减重代谢手术后神经影像改变与认知功能评估的研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 203-208.
[13] 左舜之, 张志强, 肖云燚, 江娇, 何亚玲, 刘羽. 针刺结合重复经颅磁刺激改善脑卒中患者单侧忽略的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 134-139.
[14] 刘婷, 杨逸昊, 李仙, 李丽娟, 马琳, 李其富. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后认知功能障碍的静息态功能磁共振研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 81-85.
[15] 祁研, 张岩, 陈雪, 刘颖, 史楠. 探讨高低频交互rTMS对老年脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能、吞咽功能及日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 359-363.
阅读次数
全文


摘要