切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (03) : 295 -300. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2011.03.010

临床研究

关节灌洗和透明质酸钠治疗不可复性关节盘前移位的疗效比较
郑有华1,(), 匡世军1, 苏凯1, 张志光1, 杨科1   
  1. 1.510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院·口腔医学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-01 出版日期:2011-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郑有华
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2007B031505006)中山大学临床医学研究5010 计划项目(2007050)

Clinical effects of arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate in treatment of tempoomandiular disorders disc displacement without reduction

You-hua ZHENG1,(), Shi-jun KUANG1, Kai SU1, Zhi-guang ZHANG1, Ke YANG1   

  1. 1.Guanghua School of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatological Research, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2010-11-01 Published:2011-06-01
  • Corresponding author: You-hua ZHENG
引用本文:

郑有华, 匡世军, 苏凯, 张志光, 杨科. 关节灌洗和透明质酸钠治疗不可复性关节盘前移位的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(03): 295-300.

You-hua ZHENG, Shi-jun KUANG, Kai SU, Zhi-guang ZHANG, Ke YANG. Clinical effects of arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate in treatment of tempoomandiular disorders disc displacement without reduction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2011, 5(03): 295-300.

目的

探讨关节灌洗和透明质酸钠治疗不同病程的颞下颌关节(TMJ)不可复性关节盘前移位的临床效果。

方法

选择2006 年10 月至2009 年3 月TMJ 不可复性关节盘前移位126 例(138 侧关节)进行关节灌洗和透明质酸腔内注射治疗,按发病病程分为三组:6 个月以内组36 例;6 ~12 个月组42 例;12 个月以上组48 例。 随访12 ~36 个月(平均26 个月),并对三种方法的疗效进行比较。

结果

三组总有效率为88.9%(112/126)。 其中6 个月以内组术后张口度平均增加(8.2±3.4)mm,健侧侧向运动增加(4.8±1.4)mm,91.7%(33/36)患者疼痛明显缓解,有效率为94.4%(34/36)。 6 ~12 个月组张口度平均增加(8.0±3.2)mm,健侧侧向运动增加(4.4±1.5)mm,90.5%(38/42)患者疼痛明显缓解,有效率为92.9%(38/42)。12 个月以上组术后张口度平均增加(7.1±4.1)mm,健侧侧向运动增加(3.5±2.4)mm,81.3%(39/48)患者疼痛明显缓解,有效率为83.3%(40/48)。 三组比较,张口度、侧向运动改善、疼痛缓解及有效率,6 个月以内组和6 ~12 个月组均优于12 个月以上组(P <0.05),而6 个月以内组和6 ~12 个月组差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。

结论

关节灌洗术和透明质酸钠治疗不可复性关节盘前移位是有效的治疗方法,发病在12 个月以内治疗效果明显优于12 个月以上。 因此,早期治疗有助于提高疗效。

Objective

To compare clinical effects of arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate in treatment of TMD disc displacement without reduction of different stages.

Methods

126 cases (138 joints) with TMD disc displacement without reduction underwent arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate injection.These cases were distributed to three groups according to course of diseases: less than 6 months; 6 to 12 months; and over 12 months.The follow-up period was 12 to 36 months (average 26 months).The clinical effects of each group were compared.

Results

The total success rate of three groups was 88.9%(112/126).In less 6 months group, postoperative MIO(maximum interincisal opening) increased (8.2±3.4)mm and lateral excursions increased (4.8± 1.4)mm in average.91.7%(33/36) out of all patients who complaining pain as main symptom released.The success rate was 94.4%(34/36).In the group 6 ~12 months, postoperative MIO increased (8.0±3.2)mm and lateral excursions increased (4.4±1.5)mm.90.5%(38/42) of patients who had pain felt the symptoms reduced.The success rate was 92.9%(38/42).In the group over 12 months, postoperative MIO increased (7.1±4.1)mm and lateral excursions increased (3.5±2.4)mm in average.81.3%(39/48) of patients had pain released.The success rate was 83.3%(40/48).Comparing with MIO, lateral excursions, pain release and success rate, the group less 6 months and the group 6 ~12 months were better than that of the group over 12 months (P <0.05), however no significant differences were found between the group less 6 months and the group 6 ~12 months (P >0.05).

Conclusions

Arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate injection are the effective procedures in treatment of TMD disc displacement without reduction.However,the clinical effects were better in cases treated within 12 months than those over 12 months.Earlier treatment is better.

图1 治疗前CBCT 影像检查显示不可复性关节盘前移位
图2 治疗前许勒氏位显示不可复性关节盘前移位
表1 三组治疗前后临床指标变化情况(±s)
表2 三组TMD 治疗前后疗效比较(±s)
图3 治疗前后患者张口度变化 A:治疗前; B:治疗后3 个月; C:治疗后6 个月
1
Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA.Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening.J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1991,49(11):1163-1167.
2
Yeung RW, Chow RL, Samman N, et al.Short-term therapeutic outcome of intra-articular high molecular weight hyaluronic acid injection for nonreducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2006,102(4):453-461.
3
Alpaslan GH, Alpaslan C.Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements.J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001,59(6):613-618.
4
徐天舒.透明质酸钠治疗颞下颌关节绞锁的临床研究.北京口腔医学, 2008,16(6):338-339.
5
李晓东,史宗道,田卫东.透明质酸钠关节腔内注射治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的疗效分析.华西口腔医学杂志, 2004,22(2):135-137.
6
王昊,马晓辉,祈森荣,等.颞颌关节上腔灌洗治疗不可复性关节盘前移位的临床研究.北京口腔医学, 2003,11(3):150-152.
7
韩正学,哈綨,杨驰.颞下颌关节灌洗术治疗不可复性关节盘前移位的临床研究.中华口腔医学杂志, 1999,34(5):269-271.
8
Aktas I, Yalcin S, Sencer S.Prognostic indicators of the outcome of arthrocentesis with and without sodium hyaluronate injection for the treatment of disc displacement without reduction: a magnetic resonance imaging study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,39(11):1080-1085.
9
Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Tanimoto K, et al.Lubrication of the temporomandibular joint.Ann Biomed Eng, 2008,36(1):14-29.
10
Sato S, Oguri S, Yamaguchi K, et al.Pumping injection of sodium hyaluronate for patients with non-reducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint: two year follow-up.J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2001,29(2):89-93.
11
Oliveras-Moreno JM, Hernandez-Pacheco E, Oliveras-Quintana T, et al.Efficacy and safety of sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of Wilkes stage Ⅱdisease.J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008,66(11):2243-2246.
12
Basterzi Y, Sari A, Demirkan F, et al.Intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection for the treatment of reducing and nonreducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.Ann Plast Surg, 2009,62(3):265-267.
13
Gu Z, Wu Q, Zhang Y, et al.Visco-supplementation therapy in internal derangement of temporomandibular joint.Chin Med J(Engl),1998,111(7):656-659.
14
Shi Z, Guo C, Awad M.Hyaluronate for temporomandibular joint disorders.Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003,(1):CD002970.
15
史宗道,郭春岚,陈娥.关节内注射透明质酸钠治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病效果的系统评价.中国循证医学杂志, 2004,4(6):368-376.
16
Manfredini D, Piccotti F, Guarda-Nardini L.Hyaluronic acid in the treatment of TMJ disorders: a systematic review of the literature.Cranio, 2010,28(3):166-176.
[1] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[2] 陈曦, 朱雯雯, 张容慈, 吴明乐, 沈山. 形态学和功能性磁共振成像在颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断方面的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 155-159.
[3] 李传洁, 张清彬. "盘骨肌心"(MOODE)五维同治理念:颞下颌关节紊乱病诊疗的思考[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 137-143.
[4] 李莉玫, 朱耀旻, 姚微, 梁潇, 王昱萌. 颏成形术联合颞下颌关节盘复位锚固术对颞下颌关节内紊乱伴下颌偏缩畸形的治疗作用分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 228-233.
[5] 张清彬, 朱明静, 李传洁, 刘洪臣. 浅谈颞下颌关节紊乱病的咬合板治疗[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 138-143.
[6] 邝思驰, 陈正, 张丽娜, 姜航, 何炳均, 沈敏. MRI在诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病及评价RW咬合板治疗效果中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 164-168.
[7] 陈妹玲, 张娟, 陈刚, 吕小康, 黄昕. 颞下颌关节紊乱病不同症状患者心理因素调查[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(05): 390-394.
[8] 李锐, 张睿, 付坤, 高宁, 乔永明. 手术治疗单侧不可复性关节盘前移位的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(01): 57-62.
[9] 叶周熹, 史俊, 杨驰. 正颌手术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(05): 426-429.
[10] 曹婉婷, 孔祥波, 王伟财, 朱珊珊, 张兆强, 陈雪英, 李浣洋, 周智洋, 房思炼. 640 层动态容积CT 对颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断的意义[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(04): 296-300.
[11] 陈伟生, 郑有华, 吴夏怡, 林雪峰. RDC/TMD 轴Ⅰ分类方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(01): 37-39.
[12] 倪永梁, 王海新, 焦守镔, 杨义, 周强, 刘希高, 史本康. 膀胱灌注透明质酸钠联合膀胱区极超短波照射在非细菌性膀胱炎中的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 318-323.
[13] 吴忠亮, 陈征, 张俊夫, 徐晓龙, 江东根, 林佳钦, 刘宏, 狄金明, 刘肖瑛. 膀胱扩张术治疗氯胺酮相关性膀胱挛缩的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 43-46.
[14] 马聪, 李雪靖, 郑晓佐, 张晓阳, 段坤峰, 刘国强, 郄素会. 关节腔内注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸钠治疗Ⅰ-Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 282-288.
[15] 焦递进, 杨杰, 聂士超, 马旭, 王译晗, 王佳媛, 刘素媛, 邬波. 曲安奈德联合透明质酸钠治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(06): 348-358.
阅读次数
全文


摘要