切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 380 -384. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2024.06.006

论著

碘仿碘甘油明胶海绵治疗干槽症的临床效果回顾分析
罗士维1, 李卫国1, 代国荣1,()   
  1. 1.中山大学附属第三医院口腔医学中心,广州 510630
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-21 出版日期:2024-12-01
  • 通信作者: 代国荣
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划(20220101978)

Retrospective analysis of clinical effect of iodoform-iodoglycerin-gelatin sponge in the treatment of dry socket

Shiwei Luo1, Weiguo Li1, Guorong Dai1,()   

  1. 1.Stomatology Center,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510630,China
  • Received:2024-05-21 Published:2024-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Guorong Dai
引用本文:

罗士维, 李卫国, 代国荣. 碘仿碘甘油明胶海绵治疗干槽症的临床效果回顾分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-384.

Shiwei Luo, Weiguo Li, Guorong Dai. Retrospective analysis of clinical effect of iodoform-iodoglycerin-gelatin sponge in the treatment of dry socket[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 380-384.

目的

研究在不进行局部麻醉清创的情况下采用碘仿碘甘油明胶海绵治疗干槽症的临床效果。

方法

纳入2020年7月至2023年7月于中山大学附属第三医院因干槽症就诊的患者32例,根据治疗方法将全部32例患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各16例。其中,观察组在不进行局部麻醉清创情况下,冲洗拔牙窝后填塞碘仿碘甘油明胶海绵,对照组按传统干槽症处理方法,局部麻醉下清创拔牙窝,3%过氧化氢水溶液、0.9%氯化钠溶液擦拭拔牙窝后填塞碘仿纱条。通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估两组患者治疗后第1、3、7天的疼痛程度,检查第7天牙槽窝内肉芽组织生长、骨壁探痛情况,统计两组患者疼痛评分及治疗有效率,采用t 检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。

结果

观察组患者在治疗前及治疗后第1、3、7天VAS评分分别为(8.50±0.89)、(7.19±0.98)、(3.44±1.15)和(1.13±0.74)分,相同时间点对照组VAS 评分分别为(8.44±0.96)、(6.69±1.20)、(3.16±0.81)和(1.06±0.83)分。与治疗前相比,两组患者治疗后第3天的VAS评分均出现明显下降,差异均有统计学意义(t 观察组=13.88,P 观察组<0.001,t 对照组=16.91,P 对照组<0.001)。两组在各个时间节点VAS评分相比差异均无统计学意义(t 治疗前=0.19,P 治疗前=0.85;t 治疗后3d=0.96,P 治疗后3d=0.35;t 治疗后7d=0.25,P 治疗后7d=0.80),观察组治疗有效率(93.75%)与对照组治疗有效率(100%)相比差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.032,P=0.31)。

结论

在不局部麻醉清创的情况下,采用碘仿碘甘油明胶海绵局部上药治疗干槽症可明显缓解患者疼痛症状,促进拔牙窝愈合,是有效、相对微创的治疗干槽症的方法。

Objective

To observe and evaluate the clinical effect of using iodoform-iodoglyceringelatin sponge to treat dry socket without local anesthetic debridement.

Methods

A total of 32 patients with dry socket who were treated at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from July 2020 to July 2023 were recruited,and they were divided into an observation group and a control group,with 16 patients in each. For the observation group,patients were treated without local anesthetic debridement,and the tooth socket was flushed and filled with iodoform-iodoglycerin-gelatin sponge. For the control group,the paitents were treated according to the traditional method of dry socket,where the tooth socket was debrided under local anesthesia,and the iodophor gauze was filled after hydrogen peroxide and saline cleaning.The pain degree(visual analogue scale)on the first,third,and seventh day after treatment,and the growth of granulation tissue in the tooth socket and the pain sensation of the bone wall on the seventh day were evaluated in the two groups. The pain score and treatment effectiveness of the two groups were statistically analyzed by t-test and Chi-square test,and the test level α = 0.05.

Results

For the observation group,the VAS pain scores before treatment,on the first,third,and seventh day after treatment were 8.50±0.89,7.19±0.98,3.44±1.15,and 1.13±0.74,respectively.For the control group,the VAS pain scores before treatment,on the first,third,and seventh day after treatment were 8.44±0.96,6.69±1.20,3.16±0.81,and 1.06±0.83,respectively.Compared with the first day,the VAS values of the observation and the control groups both showed significant decrease on the third days after treatment(tobservationgroup = 13.88,Pobservationgroup<0.001,tcontrolgroup = 16.91,Pcontrolgroup<0.001). There was no statistical significance in pain scores between the two groups at each time point(t0d=0.19,P0d=0.85;t3d=0.96,P3d=0.35;t7d=0.25,P7d=0.80).The treatment effective rate of the observation group(93.75%)and the control group(100%)showed no statistically significant difference(χ2=1.032,P=0.31).

Conclusions

The use of iodoform-iodoglycerin-gelatin sponge for local treatment of dry socket could significantly relieve the pain symptoms of patients and promote the healing of the tooth socket,which would be an effective and relatively minimally invasive method for treating dry socket.

表1 32例干槽症患者治疗前后视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较(分±s
表2 32例干槽症患者治疗有效率对比[例(%)]
[1]
Birn H. Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis("dry socket")[J]. Int J Oral Surg,1973,2(5):211-263. DOI:10.1016/S0300-9785(73)80045-6.
[2]
Mamoun J. Dry socket etiology,diagnosis,and clinical treatment techniques[J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg,2018,44(2):52-58.DOI:10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.52.
[3]
Kumari A,Roy S,Chandra P. Evaluation of risk factors for dry socket[J].Eur J Meolecular Clin Med,2021,8(4):1292-1295.
[4]
Kuśnierek W,Brzezińska K,Nijakowski K,et al. Smoking as a risk factor for dry socket:A systematic review[J]. Dent J(Basel),2022,10(7):121.DOI:10.3390/dj10070121.
[5]
Tandon P,Kumar Sahoo S,Mohanty L,et al.Dry socket prevalence and risk factors in third molar extractions:A prospective observational study[J]. Cureus,2024,16(3):e56721. DOI:10.7759/cureus.56721.
[6]
Pakravan A,Gorji NE,Vaziri P,et al. Prevalence of dry socket following tooth extraction and associated factors[J].J Mazandaran University Med Sci,2021,31(198):182-187.
[7]
Shirzadeh A,Eshghpour M,Abrishami MH,et al. Relationship between the duration of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars and the incidence of dry socket[J]. J Mash Dent,2020,44(1):65-72.DOI:10.22038/JMDS.2020.43543.1841.
[8]
Taberner-Vallverdú M,Nazir M,Sánchez-Garcés MÁ,et al.Efficacy of different methods used for dry socket management:A systematic review[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2015,20(5):e633-e639.DOI:10.4317/medoral.20589.
[9]
Kamal A,Omar M,Samsudin AR. Management of dry socket:New regenerative techniques emerge while old treatment prevails[J].Dentistry Review,2022:100035.DOI:10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100035.
[10]
Noroozi AR,Philbert RF. Modern concepts in understanding and management of the "dry socket" syndrome:Comprehensive review of the literature[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2009,107(1):30-35. DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.043.
[11]
Kolokythas A,Olech E,Miloro M. Alveolar osteitis:A comprehensive review of concepts and controversies[J]. Int J Dent,2010:249073.DOI:10.1155/2010/249073.
[12]
刘亮方.碘仿氧化锌丁香油糊剂治疗干槽症的临床疗效研究[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2020,11(3):19-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2020.03.008.
[13]
柳强,李云霞.盐酸米诺环素复合明胶海绵治疗干槽症的临床研究[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志,2010,20(4):266-267. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2010.04.010.
[14]
Sanchis JM,Sáez U,Peñarrocha M,et al. Tetracycline compound placement to prevent dry socket:A postoperative study of 200 impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2004,62(5):587-591.DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.035.
[15]
Kamal A,Salman B,Abdul Razak NH,et al. The efficacy of concentrated growth factor in the healing of alveolar osteitis:A clinical study[J]. Int J Dent,2020:9038629. DOI:10.1155/2020/9038629.
[16]
方会清,张子川,陈光.重组牛碱性成纤维细胞生长因子凝胶治疗干槽症的临床疗效观察[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志,2018,5(26):63-65.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-7882.2018.26.037.
[17]
Soliman O. Treatment outcome of dry socket following immediate implant placement using platelet rich fibrin:A prospective multicentre clinical study[J]. Egyptian Dent J,2021,67(3):2101-2108.DOI:10.21608/EDJ.2021.62600.1497.
[18]
Supachawaroj N,Limsitthichaikoon S. Factors affecting gelation of lidocaine hydrochloride - loaded polyelectrolyte complex thermosensitivity gel for dry socket treatment[J].Key Engineering Materials,2021,901:111-116.DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.901.111.
[19]
Rather AM,Rai S,Rattan V,et al. Comparaison of efficacy and safety of fentanyl transdermal patch with oral ketorolac for pain management in dry socket:A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg,2022,23(3):552-560. DOI:10.1007/s12663-022-01713-6.
[20]
Materni A,Pasquale C,Longo E,et al. Prevention of dry socket with ozone oil-based gel after inferior third molar extraction:A double-blind split-mouth randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial[J].Gels,2023,9(4):289.DOI:10.3390/gels9040289.
[21]
Khalifah M. Oleozon versus major autohemotherapy in the treatment of dry socket[J].Egyptian Dent J,2021,67(3):1925-1929.DOI:10.21608/edj.2021.60588.1474.
[22]
Nesser SA.Comparison between the efficiency of alo evera extract and alvogyl in dry socket(alveolar osteitis)management[J]. Int J Dent Oral Sci,2021,8(2):1578-1582. DOI:10.19070/2377-8075-21000313.
[23]
Al-Shamiri HM,Al-Maweri SA,Alahmary AW,et al. Efficacy of laser therapy for alveolar osteitis:A systematic review of the available evidence[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract,2022,22(2):101711.DOI:10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101711.
[24]
Hakobyan G,Nersisyan A,Abrahamyan A,et al. Low-intensity laser efficacy in combined treatment of patients with alveolar osteitis[J]. J Bulletin Oral Maxillofac Surg,2022,18(1):101-111.DOI:10.58240/1829006x-2022.18.1-101.
[25]
Mohamed ME,Abdallah MA,Abdullah AAB. Efficacy of tranexamic acid on the incidence of dry socket following lower third molar surgery[J].Al-Azhar Assiut Dent J,2020,3(1):83-88.DOI:10.21608/aadj.2020.92946.
[26]
Otake H, Sato Y, Nakatani E, et al. Oxytetracycline -hydrocortisone ointment reduces the occurrence of both dry socket and post-extraction pain after third molar extraction:An observational study[J].PLoS One,2021,16(7):e254221.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0254221.
[27]
Camps-Font O,Sábado-Bundó H,Toledano-Serrabona J,et al.Antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of dry socket and surgical site infection after lower third molar extraction:A network meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2024,53(1):57-67.DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2023.08.001.
[28]
Azher S,Patel A. Antibiotics in dentoalveolar surgery,a closer look at infection,alveolar osteitis and adverse reaction[J].J Oral Maxillofacl Surg,2021,79(11):2203-2214. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.019.
[29]
Bhoi S,Patel S,Jayanna R,et al. Does excessive saline irrigation causes dry socket?A surgeon's dilemma[J]. Int J Appli Dent Sci,2020,6(2):223-225.
[1] 薛清佩, 邹云涛, 潘进贤, 崔书豪. 可吸收螺钉治疗不同类型的内踝骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 124-127.
[2] 吴斯媛, 艾毅龙. 两种生物膜材料在牙周辅助加速成骨正畸治疗技术中的骨增量研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 79-84.
[3] 孙增涛, 张垒, 刘薇, 李继军, 王银昌. 刮宫术前行子宫动脉栓塞术治疗347例子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床价值研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 204-208.
[4] 刘津华, 张磊, 穆永旭. 明胶海绵颗粒和聚乙烯醇颗粒治疗瘢痕妊娠的临床效果比较[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 51-54.
[5] 李青文, 李传方, 甘立军. 冠状动脉瘤的诊断学特征及明胶海绵颗粒栓塞治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 94-98.
阅读次数
全文


摘要