切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 113 -117. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2022.02.008

口腔医学教育

数字化效果模拟器在口腔正畸临床教学中的应用效果评估
郑金绚1, 孟博文1, 余镕丞1, 吴莉萍1, 陈正元1, 刘冠琪1, 曹阳1,()   
  1. 1. 中山大学附属口腔医院,光华口腔医学院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室,广州 510055
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-09 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 曹阳

Effect of outcome simulator on orthodontic clinical teaching

Jinxuan Zheng1, Bowen Meng1, Rongcheng Yu1, Liping Wu1, Zhengyuan Chen1, Guanqi Liu1, Yang Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2021-12-09 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yang Cao
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81900958, 81970963); Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(2020A1515010059, 2021A1515012535); Medical Science and Technology Research Fund of Guangdong Province(A2020201); Undergraduate Education Quality Program of Sun Yat-sen University(Academic Affairs〔2022〕No.20)
引用本文:

郑金绚, 孟博文, 余镕丞, 吴莉萍, 陈正元, 刘冠琪, 曹阳. 数字化效果模拟器在口腔正畸临床教学中的应用效果评估[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 113-117.

Jinxuan Zheng, Bowen Meng, Rongcheng Yu, Liping Wu, Zhengyuan Chen, Guanqi Liu, Yang Cao. Effect of outcome simulator on orthodontic clinical teaching[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 113-117.

目的

评估数字化效果模拟器在口腔正畸临床教学中的应用效果。

方法

选取2020—2021年于中山大学附属口腔医院正畸科就诊的安氏Ⅰ类、安氏Ⅱ类和安氏Ⅲ类错畸形病例共6个,完善问诊、临床检查和X线片检查后,提供相应的石膏模型和数字化模型。中山大学光华口腔医学院口腔正畸学专业的2018 ~ 2021级研究生28人通过分层随机抽样法分为两组(每组14人),分别进行传统的石膏模型排牙预测(A组)和数字化效果模拟器预测(B组),并完成正畸诊断和治疗计划。由具有硕士生导师资格的3位教师对其诊断和治疗计划进行评估,同时讲授其依据。两组学生分别对传统石膏排牙预测和数字化效果模拟器预测过程进行评价。

结果

在"制定方案主动性"和"考虑牙移动细节"方面,B组学生得分高于A组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。相比于A组,B组中更多学生认为数字化模拟器可提高学习兴趣(A组78.57%、B组100%)、加深对诊断与治疗计划的理解(A组75.00%、B组89.28%)和考虑更多三维牙移动(A组64.28%、B组75.00%)。在教师评价中,B组在治疗计划讲授过程得分高于A组(P<0.001)。

结论

数字化效果模拟器可锻炼学生的临床思维能力,提高口腔正畸诊断与治疗计划的制定的教学效果。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of outcome simulator in the clinical teaching of orthodontics.

Methods

Six typical malocclusion cases, derived from patients treated in Department of Orthodontics Hospital of Stomatology during 2020 to 2021, including Angle ClassⅠ, Angle ClassⅡ and Class Ⅲ malocclusion were selected. All clinical materials including contented consultation, clinical examination, X-ray analysis, plaster models and digital models were provided. 28 graduated students (grade 2019 to 2021) majoring in Orthodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, were divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) by stratified random sampling. The students performed tooth arrangement on traditional plaster model (Group A) or outcome simulator (Group B) respectively, and then made diagnostic analysis and treatment plans. The diagnosis analysis and treatment plans from Group A and Group B were evaluated by 3 teachers (postgraduate tutors) and the explanations are given as well. The students and teachers conducted self-evaluation after undergoing different teaching methods.

Results

Students in Group B got higher scores in "Initiative of making treatment plans" and "Consider more tooth movement details" compared to students in Group A (P<0.001) . The ratios of agreement in "promoting interests in study" (78.57% in group A, 100% in group B) , "easier to understand treatment plans" (75% in group A, 89.28% in group B) and "more consideration of 3D tooth movement" (64.28% in group A, 75.00% in group B) in Group B were higher than Group A. Moreover, the teaching efficiency was higher in Group B compared to Group A (P<0.001) , rating by the teachers.

Conclusion

The outcome simulator can help build up students’ logical thinking power in clinical work and improve the teaching effect of making diagnosis and clinical treatment plans for orthodontics.

表1 硕士生导师对研究生正畸诊断与治疗计划的计分量表
表2 硕士生导师对研究生正畸诊断与治疗计划的评价计分细则
表3 研究生对实验内容的评价量表
表4 本研究28位研究生诊断和治疗计划得分情况比较(±s
表5 两组研究生对石膏排牙和数字化预测的评价结果[以赞同率为比较(%)]
[1]
Kirschneck CKamuf BPutsch C,et al. Conformity,reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows[J]. Comput Biol Med2018100:114-122. DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.035.
[2]
白玉兴.三维数字化技术在正畸诊断和治疗设计中的应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志201651(6):326-330. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2016.06.002.
[3]
Warnecki MNahajowski MPapadopoulos MA,et al. Assessment of the reliability of measurements taken on digital orthodontic models obtained from scans of plaster models in laboratory scanners. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod2022:cjac005. DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjac005.
[4]
厉松,苏茹甘.数字化技术在口腔正畸临床中的应用[J].口腔疾病防治201927(2):69-73. DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2019.02.001.
[5]
Pei YAi XZha H,et al. 3D exemplar-based random walks for tooth segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography images [J]. Med Phys201643(9):5040. DOI:10.1118/1.4960364.
[6]
Lee RJPi SPark J,et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of root position at the reset appointment without radiographs:a proof-of-concept study[J]. Prog Orthod201819(1):15. DOI:10.1186/s40510-018-0214-4.
[7]
Hammoudeh JAHowell LKBoutros S,et al. Current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery:Traditional methods versus 3D surgical planning[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open20153(2):e307. DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184.
[8]
Solaberrieta EGarmendia ABrizuela A,et al. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records:Section quantity and dimensions[J]. Biomed Res Int20162016:7173824. DOI:10.1155/2016/7173824.
[9]
Stafeev ARyakhovsky APetrov P,et al. Comparative analysis of the reproduction accuracy of main methods for finding the mandible position in the centric relation using digital research method. Comparison between analog-to-digital and digital methods:A preliminary report[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health202017(3):933. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17030933.
[10]
Schlenz MASchubert VSchmidt A,et al. Digital versus conventional impression taking focusing on interdental areas:A clinical trial[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health202017(13):4725. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17134725.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[4] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[5] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[6] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[7] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[8] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[9] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[10] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[11] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[12] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要