切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 270 -277. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2019.05.003

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

种植覆盖义齿修复牙列缺失的生活质量研究
黄嘉筑1, 张辉1, 刘雪梅2, 陈建宇1, 王彦1, 林雪峰1,†()   
  1. 1. 中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院，广东省口腔医学重点实验室，广州　510055
    2. 深圳市南山区妇幼保健医院，深圳市出生队列研究中心　518000
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-24 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 林雪峰

Evaluation of quality of life on rehabilitation of implant-supported overdentures with edentulous dentition

Jiazhu Huang1, Hui Zhang1, Xuemei Liu2, Jianyu Chen1, Yan Wang1, Xuefeng Lin1,†()   

  1. 1. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincal Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
    2. Shenzhen Birth Cohort Study Center, Nanshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2019-05-24 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xuefeng Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Xuefeng, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

黄嘉筑, 张辉, 刘雪梅, 陈建宇, 王彦, 林雪峰. 种植覆盖义齿修复牙列缺失的生活质量研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 270-277.

Jiazhu Huang, Hui Zhang, Xuemei Liu, Jianyu Chen, Yan Wang, Xuefeng Lin. Evaluation of quality of life on rehabilitation of implant-supported overdentures with edentulous dentition[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 270-277.

目的

研究下颌牙列缺失患者采用全口义齿（CD）和种植覆盖义齿（IOD）修复后的患者满意度以及口腔健康相关生活质量（OHRQoL），探讨种植覆盖全口义齿修复对老年下颌牙缺失患者的心理及社会行为是否存在积极的影响。

方法

收集2016至2018年在中山大学附属口腔医院门诊就诊，50 ~ 80岁下颌牙列缺失，曾采用传统全口义齿修复且因义齿稳定性差而自愿行种植覆盖全口义齿修复的受试者19例，其中男8例，平均69.25岁；女11例，平均72.45岁。通过自身对照研究，每位受试者均先后佩戴在相同标准下制作的新传统全口义齿（CD）以及种植覆盖义齿（IOD），并于戴用义齿3个月后完成口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP-20）、老年口腔健康评价指数量表（GOHAI）和日常生活牙科影响量表（DIDL）调查，分析传统全口义齿和种植覆盖全口义齿修复对患者心理状态和生活质量的影响。数据采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析，P<0.05为差异有统计学意义，并计算CD组和IOD组OHRQoL得分的效应量（ES值）以评价其影响程度。

结果

OHIP-20、GOHAI、DIDL量表均显示，IOD组在量表的功能限制、疼痛、心理不适、生理能力受限、心理能力受限、社交能力丧失、身心缺陷、美观、口腔舒适的各领域得分及总体得分上均明显优于CD组，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。此外，根据DIDL量表评价标准得知，IOD修复可有效提提升患者满意度，并减少不满意人数的比例。3个量表在各领域及总得分的ES值均大于0.8，代表每个领域均受到高度影响，并以咀嚼能力（ES = 3.74）、生理能力受限（ES = 3.12）和功能限制（ES = 2.94）等生理功能改善最为显著。说明，IOD组比CD组对患者的生活质量改善较好，且对各方面的改善程度较高。

结论

OHIP-20、GOHAI、DIDL量表调查结果反映种植覆盖全口义齿修复对老年下颌牙缺失患者的心理及社会行为有积极的影响。

关键词: 义齿，全口, 种植义齿修复, 种植覆盖义齿, 口腔健康相关生活质量
Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between complete dentures (CD) and two implants-supported overdentures (IOD) .

Methods

From 2016 to 2018, 19 subjects aged 50-80 years with edentulous mandible were selected and enrolled in this study (eight males, with an average age of 69.25 years; 11 females, with an average age of 72.45 years) . All these patients received treatment in Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, but were not satisfied with the complete denture and requested a stable denture. In this clinical trial, each subject received both a new complete denture (CD) and an implant-supported overdenture (IOD) made with the same standard. Using self-control method, patient satisfaction and OHRQoL were measured by Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) , geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) and dental impact on daily living (DIDL) after 3-month adaptation to CD and IOD rehabilitation. Data were compared by Wilcoxon′s signed rank test at a significance level of 0.05, and the effect size (ES) of OHRQoL scores in the CD group and IOD group was calculated to evaluate the influence degree.

Results

All the results in OHIP-20, GOHAI, and DIDL scales showed that IOD group was better than CD group in terms of functional limitations, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, handicap, appearance, oral comfort, and global scores, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05) . In addition, according to the evaluation criteria of DIDL scale, IOD was found to effectively improve patient satisfaction and reduce the proportion of dissatisfaction. The ES values in each field and the total score of the three scales were greater than 0.8, indicating that each field was highly affected, and physiological functions such as chewing ability (ES = 3.74) , limited physiological ability (ES = 3.12) and limited functional ability (ES = 2.94) were most improved. It can be concluded that IOD group had a better quality of life improvement than CD group, and had a higher degree of improvement in all aspects.

Conclusion

The OHIP-20, GOHAI and DIDL findings suggested that implant-supported overdenture had a positive impact on the psychological and social behavior of mandibular edentulism in elderly.

Key words: Denture, complete, Dental prosthesis, implant-supported, Implant-supported overdentures, Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)
表1 19例受试者修复后口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP-20）的评价及效应量（ES）分析
OHIP-20领域 CD组 IOD组 t值 P值 ES均值
功能限制 8.21 ± 2.18 1.79 ± 1.44 12.61 <0.001 2.94
疼痛 10.32 ± 3.64 1.79 ± 2.92 8.86 <0.001 2.34
心理不适 4.89 ± 1.76 0.37 ± 0.68 10.10 <0.001 2.57
生理能力受限 10.26 ± 2.68 1.89 ± 1.41 13.76 <0.001 3.12
心理能力受限 3.63 ± 1.89 0.26 ± 0.45 7.42 <0.001 1.78
社交能力丧失 3.95 ± 2.44 0.21 ± 0.54 6.60 <0.001 1.53
身心缺陷 4.58 ± 1.47 0.84 ± 0.90 11.26 <0.001 2.54
总分 45.84 ± 13.73 7.16 ± 6.01 12.13 <0.001 2.82
表2 19例受试者修复后老年口腔健康评价指数量表（GOHAI）的评价及效应量（ES）分析
GOHAI领域 CD组 IOD组 t值 P值 ES均值
功能限制 10.47 ± 3.01 1.63 ± 1.21 11.72 <0.001 2.94
心理不适 10.00 ± 4.10 1.63 ± 1.38 8.04 <0.001 2.04
疼痛不适 3.89 ± 2.21 0.21 ± 0.54 6.88 <0.001 1.67
总分 24.37 ± 8.01 3.47 ± 2.44 11 <0.001 2.61
图1 19例受试者修复后日常生活牙科影响量表（DIDL）的调查结果<0为不赞成；0 ~ 0.69为相对赞成；0.7 ~ 1为完全赞成
表3 19例受试者修复后日常生活牙科影响量表（DIDL）的评价及效应量（ES）分析
DIDL领域 CD组 IOD组 t值 P值 ES均数
美观 -0.66 ± 0.41 1±0 -11.42 <0.001 2.61
疼痛 0.46 ± 0.35 0.96 ± 0.09 6.16 <0.001 1.43
口腔舒适 0.19 ± 0.31 0.52 ± 0.17 5.43 <0.001 1.07
一般性能 0.16 ± 0.52 0.98 ± 0.08 6.98 <0.001 1.58
咀嚼能力 -0.40 ± 0.34 0.87 ± 0.16 -14.84 <0.001 3.74
[1]
Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, et al. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health[J]. Bull World Health Organ，2005，83(9): 661-669. DOI: /S0042-96862005000900011.
[2]
赵铱民.口腔修复学[M]. 7版.北京：人民卫生出版，2012：294-295.
[3]
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Aging：1950-2050[M]. New York：United Nations，2002：483.
[4]
Redford M, Drury TF, Kingman A, et al. Denture use and the technical quality of dental prostheses among persons 18-74 years of age：United States，1988-1991[J]. J Dent Res，1996，75(2): 714-725. DOI: 10.1177/002203459607502S11.
[5]
Oh SH, Kim Y, Park JY, et al. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses，removable implant-supported prostheses，and complete dentures：patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2016，27(2): 31-37. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12514.
[6]
陈卓凡，刘佳钰.种植义齿修复患者口腔健康相关生活质量评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志，2011，4(3): 139-142. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1595.2011.03.005.
[7]
Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompré PH, et al. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction，oral and general health-related quality of life：a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2009，20(6): 533-544. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01693.x.
[8]
Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2003，14(2): 173-179. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140206.x.
[9]
辛蔚妮，凌均棨. 《口腔健康影响程度量表（OHIP-14中文版）》与《老年口腔健康评价指数（GOHAI中文版）》的比较研究[J].口腔医学研究，2014，30(3): 252-257. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2014.03.018.
[10]
Schuster AJ, Marcello-Machado RM, Bielemann AM, et al. Short-term quality of life change perceived by patients after transition to mandibular overdentures[J]. Braz Oral Res，2017，31: e5. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0005.
[11]
张志愿.口腔颌面外科学[M]. 7版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2012：158-159.
[12]
Kappel S, Eberhard L, Giannakopoulos NN, et al. Immediate Loading of Two Dental Implants，in Edentulous Mandibles，with Locator® Attachments or Dolder® Bars：First Results from a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res，2015，17(4): 629-638. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12173.
[13]
蔡岫颖，邵玶，安钢辉，等.成人正畸治疗后满意度评估及相关心理因素分析[J].口腔医学，2015，35(8): 649-653. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2015.08.013.
[14]
沈正权，曾利伟.舌侧集中总义齿患者OHRQOL的研究[J].口腔医学研究，2011，10(27): 886-888. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2011.10.026.
[15]
Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index[J]. J Dent Educ，1990，54(11): 680-687.
[16]
Al-Omiri MK, Hammad OA, Lynch E, et al. Impacts of implant treatment on daily living[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants，2011，26(4): 877-886. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.03.009.
[17]
Leao A, Sheiham A. Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living[J]. J Dent Res，1995，74(7): 1408-1413. DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740071301.
[18]
Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life：A conceptual model of patient outcomes[J]. JAMA，1995，273(1): 59-65. DOI: 10.1001/jama.273.1.59.
[19]
Montero J, Macedo C, López-Valverde A, et al. Validation of the oral health impact profile（OHIP-20sp）for Spanish edentulous patients[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal，2012，17(3): e469-e476. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17498.
[20]
Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults[J]. Int J Prosthodont，2002，15(5): 446-450. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-002-0419-2.
[21]
Locker D, Allen F. What do measures of ′oral health-related quality of life′ measure？[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol，2007，35(6): 401-411. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x.
[22]
John MT, Slade GD, Szentpétery A, et al. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed，removable，and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment[J]. Int J Prosthodont，2004，17(5): 503-511. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3692.
[23]
Alfadda SA, Attard NJ, David LA. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures[J]. Int J Prosthodont，2009，22(4): 368-373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00960.x.
[24]
Locker D, Matear D, Stephens M, et al. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol，2001，29(5): 373-381. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2001.290507.x.
[25]
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations：uses in assessing rater reliability[J]. Psychol Bull，1979，86(2): 420-428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
[26]
Hassel AJ, Steuker B, Rolko C, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of elderly Germans—comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14[J]. Community Dent Health，2010，27(4): 242-247. DOI: 10.1922/CDH_2464Hassel06.
[27]
Fillion M, Aubazac D, Bessadet M, et al. The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice：a prospective cohort study[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes，2013，11(1): 197. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-197.
[28]
Leao ATT. The development of measures of dental impacts on daily living[D]. London，UK：London University，1993.
[29]
Leao A, Sheiham A. The development of a socio-dental measure of dental impacts on daily living[J]. Community Dent Health，1996，13(1): 22-26.
[30]
Al-Omiri MK, Sghaireen MG, Al-Qudah AA, et al. Relationship between impacts of removable prosthodontic rehabilitation on daily living，satisfaction and personality profiles[J]. J Dent，2014，42(3): 366-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.010.
[31]
Hantash RO, Al-Omiri MK, Yunis MA, et al. Relationship between impacts of complete denture treatment on daily living，satisfaction and personality profiles[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract，2011，12(3): 200-207. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1035.
[1] 冯玉霞, 金作林, 秦文. 种植义齿修复后重度拥挤病例的不对称拔牙矫治一例[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 106-112.
[2] 赵莉, 李湘霞, 王晓东, 赵克. 架在全口义齿修复教学中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(02): 135-138.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号