切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 41 -44. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2017.01.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

预防性使用脱敏剂对牙漂白术后牙齿敏感的影响
宗丽1, 温玉洁1,()   
  1. 1. 528000 佛山科学技术学院附属口腔医院·佛山市口腔医院口腔修复科
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-12 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 温玉洁

Effects of preventive application of a desensitizing agent before tooth bleaching on tooth sensitivity

Li Zong1, Yujie Wen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2016-10-12 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yujie Wen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wen Yujie, Email:
引用本文:

宗丽, 温玉洁. 预防性使用脱敏剂对牙漂白术后牙齿敏感的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(01): 41-44.

Li Zong, Yujie Wen. Effects of preventive application of a desensitizing agent before tooth bleaching on tooth sensitivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(01): 41-44.

目的

研究预防性使用脱敏剂对牙漂白术后牙齿敏感的影响。

方法

选取2015年5月至2016年10月于佛山市口腔医院就诊的20例将进行诊室漂白且符合纳入标准的患者,20例患者按纳入顺序编号,随机抽取10例左侧前牙为实验组、右侧前牙为对照组,另外10例则左侧前牙为对照组、右侧前牙为实验组。实验组在漂白治疗前对即将进行漂白的牙使用脱敏剂(极固宁),对照组则使用安慰剂(蒸馏水)。采用视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)比较患者左右侧前牙(实验组与对照组)漂白术后即刻及漂白术后1周内的牙齿敏感发生率和牙齿敏感程度,并分别采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney秩和检验进行统计学分析。

结果

牙漂白术后即刻,实验组有28.33%、对照组有62.50%的牙齿出现牙齿敏感症状;牙漂白术后1周内,实验组有11.67%、对照组有43.33%的牙齿出现牙齿敏感症状。术后即刻和术后1周内,对照组牙齿敏感发生率高于实验组,差异有统计学意义(χ2即刻= 29.606、χ2术后= 30.178,P<0.001)。术后即刻和术后1周内对照组发生牙齿敏感程度均高于实验组,差异有统计学意义(Z即刻=-5.999、Z术后=-5.659,P<0.001)。

结论

预防性使用脱敏剂可以降低牙漂白术后牙齿敏感的发生率,并能有效减轻患者的牙齿敏感症状。

Objective

To study the effects of the preventive application of a desensitizing agent before tooth bleaching on tooth sensitivity.

Methods

Twenty patients, who received in-office bleaching in Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Foshan University from May 2015 to Oct 2016, were recruited according to the inclusion criteria. The patients were numbered in sequence and randomly divided into two groups. For group one, their left anterior teeth were set as the experimental group and the right side as the control. In contrast, in group two, the left anterior teeth were taken as the control group and the right side as the experimental group. Desensitizing agent (Green Or) for the experimental group and placebo (distilled water) for the control group were applied on tooth surface before the bleaching treatment. The incidence and intensity of tooth sensitivity immediate after operation and within 1 week were recorded using VAS scale. The Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney rank-sum test were applied for statistical analysis.

Results

The incidence of tooth sensitivity immediate after operation was 28.33% and 62.50% in the experimental and control group, respectively. Meanwhile, the sensitivity in 1 week after tooth bleaching was 11.67% and 43.33% in the experimental and control group, respectively. The incidence of tooth sensitivity immediate after operation and within 1 week was significantly higher in the control group than that in the experimental group (χ2imm=29.606, χ2post=30.178, P<0.001) . The intensity of tooth sensitivity immediate after operation and within 1 week was significantly higher in the control group than that in the experimental group (Zimm=-5.999, Zpost=-5.659, P<0.001) .

Conclusion

The preventive application of the desensitizing agent before tooth bleaching can effectively reduce the incidence of tooth sensitivity and relief the symptom.

表1 实验组与对照组牙齿敏感发生率(%)
表2 实验组与对照组牙齿敏感VAS评分
[1]
Tredwin CJ, Naik S, Lewis NJ,et al. Hydrogen peroxide tooth-whitening(bleaching)products:review of adverse effects and safety issues[J]. Br Dent J,2006,200(7):371-376.
[2]
Alonso de la Peña V, Balboa Cabrita O. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of carbamide peroxide an hydrogen peroxide in at-home bleaching gels[J]. Quintessence Int,2006,37(7):551-556.
[3]
Ziebolz D, Helms K, Hanning C,et al. Efficacy an oral side effects of two highly concentrated tray-based bleaching systems[J]. Clin Oral Investing,2007,11(3):267-275.
[4]
Leonarnd RH Jr, Garlang GE, Eagle JC,et al. Safety issues when using a 16% carbamide peroxide whitening solution[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent,2002,14(6):358-367.
[5]
Matis BA, Cochran MA, Wang G,et al. A clinical evaluation of two in-office bleaching regimens with and without tray bleaching[J]. Oper Dent,2009,34(2):142-149.
[6]
Matis BA, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ,et al. In vivo study of two carbamide peroxide gels with different desensitizing agents[J]. Oper Dent,2007,32(6):549-555.
[7]
杨立新,付强,罗黎.极固宁TM和Gluma脱敏剂治疗烤瓷牙牙体制备致牙本质过敏症的疗效观察[J].广东牙病防治,2004,12(1):49-50.
[8]
戴琳,程波,周杰. 3种脱敏剂治疗超声龈下刮治所致根面牙本质敏感症的疗效观察[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(1):87-89.
[9]
付振君,贾宏薇,张蕊,等.极固宁用于治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效对比观察[J].中国实用医药,2009,4(5):21-22.
[10]
王彦莉,辛志强,董志坚,等.极固宁脱敏与氟化钠甘油治疗超声洁牙后牙本质过敏的对照研究[J].实用预防医学,2010,17(3):560-561.
[1] 赵晓一, 潘洁. 美白牙膏去除人离体牙咖啡及茶渍效果的比较研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 19-23.
[2] 唐震宇, 钱成明, 王辉. 两种脱敏剂用于牙周非手术治疗术后牙本质过敏的临床研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(02): 143-146.
阅读次数
全文


摘要