切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 301 -304. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.04.008

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

粉液比例对树脂加强型玻璃离子托槽粘接的影响
黄梓濡1, 邹华1, 侯沐明1, 许欢1, 吉建新1,(), 陈艺2   
  1. 1. 510120 广州医科大学附属第一医院口腔科
    2. 510120 广州医科大学附属第一医院骨科;510120 广州,广东省骨科矫形技术与植入材料重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-04 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 吉建新

Effect of powder/liquid ratio variation of resin-modified glass ionomer cement on bonding brackets

Ziru Huang1, Hua Zou1, Muming Hou1, Huan Xu1, Jianxin Ji1,(), Yi Chen2   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedic, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Technology and Implant Materials, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2015-05-04 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianxin Ji
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ji Jianxin, Email:
引用本文:

黄梓濡, 邹华, 侯沐明, 许欢, 吉建新, 陈艺. 粉液比例对树脂加强型玻璃离子托槽粘接的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(04): 301-304.

Ziru Huang, Hua Zou, Muming Hou, Huan Xu, Jianxin Ji, Yi Chen. Effect of powder/liquid ratio variation of resin-modified glass ionomer cement on bonding brackets[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(04): 301-304.

目的

比较不同粉液比例改变对树脂加强型玻璃离子粘接剂托槽粘接效果的影响。

方法

将140颗离体人上颌前磨牙随机分为7组,每组20颗。将树脂加强型玻璃离子粘接剂粉剂改变范围设置成(-30%~30%),具体分组如下:对照组、A组(+30%)、B组(+23%)、C组(+17%)、D组(-17%)、E组(-23%)、F组(-30%)。每组牙齿经过牙面处理后用不同粉液比例树脂加强型玻璃离子粘接剂进行托槽粘接。记录粘接24 h的抗剪切强度和粘接残留指数,用SPSS 19.0对实验结果进行统计分析。

结果

A~E组的抗剪切强度与对照组相比差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但降低30%粉剂比例的F组的抗剪切强度(5.71 ± 1.55)MPa比对照组(7.55 ± 1.20)MPa降低,且两者差异有统计学意义(P=0.017),F组具有较低的粘接残留量。

结论

树脂加强型玻璃离子有较宽的临床使用范围,增加粉剂比例对树脂加强型玻璃离子粘接剂托槽粘接强度无明显影响,但降低30%粉剂比例则会降低其粘接强度。

Objective

To investigate the influence of powder/liquid ratio variation on brackets bonding of resin-modified glass ionomer cement(RMGIC).

Methods

A total of 140 mandibular premolars were randomly divided into seven groups: control group, group A(+30%), group B(+23%), group C(+17%), group D(-17%), group E(-23%), group F(-30%), according to the powder/liquid ratio, with 20 teeth in each group. Edgewise brackets were bonded with RMGIC on the teeth with different powder/liquid ratio. Shear bond strength were detected on teeth after thermocycling experiment, and the adhesive remnant index were recorded with statistical analysis.

Results

There was no statistical difference in shear bond strength(SBS)between group A-E and control group(P > 0.05). The SBS of group F(5.713 ± 1.55)MPa was significantly lower than that in other groups as well as the content of residual adhesives(P=0.017).

Conclusions

RMGIC has a wide range of clinical application, increasing powder/liquid ratio has no influence of bonding strength of RMGIC. On the contrary, decreasing 30% powder will lower the bonding strength.

表1 本研究各组粘接剂的调配比例设定
表2 本研究各组托槽粘接后抗剪切强度测试结果
表3 各组抗剪切强度两两比较的P
表4 本研究各组托槽粘接ARI计分结果
[1]
McKenna JE, Ray NJ, McKenna G, et al. The effect of variability in the powder/liquid ratio on the strength of zinc phosphate cement[J]. Int J Dent, 2011(2011): 679315.
[2]
Hahnel S, Behr M, Rosentritt M, et al. The effects of erroneous mixing of zinc carboxylate cements[J]. J Oral Sci, 2010, 52(1): 89-93.
[3]
叶慧铭,朱曼群,林桂珍,等.玻璃离子水门汀粘固前牙全冠的调拌方法探讨[J].广东牙病防治,2012,20(8): 441-442.
[4]
Cheng HY, Chen CH, Li CL, et al. Bond strength of orthodontic light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(2): 180-184.
[5]
Fonseca RB, Branco CA, Quagliatto PS, et al. Influence of powder/liquid ratio on the radiodensity and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2010, 18(6): 577-584.
[6]
J. Anthony von Fraunhofer. Dental Materials at a Glance. 2nd ed[M]. USA, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
[7]
Aratani M, Pereira AC, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al. Compressive strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material: effect of P/L ratio and storage time[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2005, 13(4): 356-359.
[8]
E L, Irie M, Nagaoka N, et al. Mechanical properties of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for luting: effect of adding spherical silica filler[J]. Dent Mater J, 2010, 29(3): 253-261.
[9]
Behr M, Rosentritt M, Loher H, et al. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types [J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(9): 1187-1193.
[10]
Behr M, Rosentritt M, Loher H, et al. Effect of variations from the recommended powder/liquid ratio on some properties of resin-modified cements[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2006, 64(4): 214-220.
[11]
杜晓岩,尹艳春,李德超,等. 3M自酸蚀黏结剂与GC光固化正畸黏结剂黏结颊面管性能比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2010,3(3): 155-157.
[12]
Pereira TB, Jansen WC, Pithon MM, et al. Effects of enamel deproteinization on bracket bonding with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2013, 35(4): 442-446.
[13]
Maruo IT, Godoy-Bezerra J, Saga AY, et al. Effect of etching and light-curing time on the shear bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement[J]. Braz Dent J, 2010, 21(6): 533-537.
[1] 李轲, 郑适泽, 陈玥, 鄢晓媛, 战德松, 付佳乐. 树脂水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷剪切粘接强度的研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 212-217.
阅读次数
全文


摘要