切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (04) : 301 -305. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2014.04.007

临床研究

不同连接方式种植体对周围组织影响的临床比较
吴亚霖1, 罗智斌1, 庄秀妹1, 刘芹1, 王轲1, 谢馨1, 邓飞龙1,()   
  1. 1.510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-02 出版日期:2014-08-01
  • 通信作者: 邓飞龙

Clinical comparison of different abutment connection on peri-implant tissues

Yalin Wu1, Zhibin Luo1, Xiumei Zhuang1, Qin Liu1, Ke Wang1, Xin Xie1, Feilong Deng1,()   

  1. 1.Guanghua School of Stomatology,Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology,Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2013-11-02 Published:2014-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Feilong Deng
引用本文:

吴亚霖, 罗智斌, 庄秀妹, 刘芹, 王轲, 谢馨, 邓飞龙. 不同连接方式种植体对周围组织影响的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(04): 301-305.

Yalin Wu, Zhibin Luo, Xiumei Zhuang, Qin Liu, Ke Wang, Xin Xie, Feilong Deng. Clinical comparison of different abutment connection on peri-implant tissues[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2014, 8(04): 301-305.

目的

比较平台转换种植体和传统基台连接种植体对上颌美学区单牙种植周围组织的影响。

方法

随机选择95 例(110 枚)上颌美学区单牙种植修复患者,其中Ankylos 系统(平台转换)47 例(54 枚种植体),Nobel Replace 系统(传统基台连接)48 例(56 枚种植体)。 在患者最终修复后36 ~62 个月进行随访,拍摄X 线片及临床检查来记录种植体周围骨组织和牙龈组织的状况,比较两组种植体边缘骨吸收量和周围软组织红色美学指数。 利用统计学方法分析所得数据。

结果

不同连接方式种植修复后种植体周围边缘骨吸收量与红色美学指数具有显著差异,平台转换种植体的骨吸收量明显少于传统基台连接组,红色美学指数也高于传统基台连接。

结论

平台转换种植体在上颌美学区单牙种植修复相较于传统基台连接种植体能更有效的保留周围骨组织且美学效果较佳。

Objective

The purpose of this study is to compare peri-implant tissues outcomes of single-tooth implants using platform switching and platform butt-joint placed into maxillary esthetics area.

Methods

One hundred and ten single-tooth implants were placed into the maxillary aesthetic area of 95 patients selected randomly; 54 implants of 47 patients were using Ankylos system (platform switching); and 56 implants of 48 patients were using Nobel Replace system (butt-joint). All the patients had a follow-up of 36 to 62 months after the implant restoration. Radiographic and clinical examinations were made at the time of the final crowns delivery and the subsequent following-up month.The peri-implant bone resorption and the index of Red Aesthetic Standard were evaluated, respectively.

Results

There were significant differences in bone resorption and red aesthetic index between the two groups after implant restoration. Bone resorption around implants using platform switching was significantly less than that using platform butt-joint, and aesthetic index of the former group was higher than the later one.

Conclusion

Dental implants using platform switching placed into the maxillary esthetic area were able to preserve better marginal bone and acquired better aesthetic effect.

表1 单牙红色美学评分标准
图1 X 线片示4 年后复诊骨水平稳定
表2 两组种植体的边缘骨吸收量(mm,±s)
表3 不同牙位的两组种植体边缘骨吸收量(mm,±s)
表4 两组种植体不同直径的边缘骨吸收量(mm,±s)
图2 平台转换种植体软组织表现稳定
表5 两组种植体的软组织红色美学指数(分)
表6 不同牙位的两组种植体周软组织红色美学指数(分,±s)
[1]
Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching:a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006,26(1):9-17.
[2]
Serrano-Sánchez P, Calvo-Guirado JL, Manzanera-Pastor E, et al. The influence of platform switching in dental implants. A literature review [J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2011,16(3):e400-e405.
[3]
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants:a review and proposed criteria of success[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1986,1(1):11-25.
[4]
Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:the pink esthetic score [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005,16(6):639-644.
[5]
Pessoa RS, Vaz LG, Marcantonio E Jr, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols:computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010,25(5):911-919.
[6]
Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture:an in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008,19(3):271-275.
[7]
Covani U, Marconcini S, Crespi R, et al. Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces [J]. Implant Dent,2006,15(3):298-304.
[8]
Vandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. A within-implant comparison to evaluate the concept of platform switching:a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2012,5(3):253-262.
[9]
Sorni-Bröker M, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M.Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues:a review[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2009,14(9):e475-e479.
[10]
Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, et al.The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2009,29(2):141-151.
[11]
Rodríguez X, Vela X, Calvo-Guirado JL, et al. Effect of platform switching on collagen fiber orientation and bone resorption around dental implants:a preliminary histologic animal study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012,27(5):1116-1122.
[12]
Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, et al. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching:a 1-year pilot study [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,68(9):2272-2277.
[13]
Andersen E, Saxegaard E, Knutsen BM, et al. A prospective clinical study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of narrowdiameter threaded implants in the anterior region of the maxilla[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2001,16(2):217-224.
[14]
Yu W, Jang YJ, Kyung HM. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress:a quantitative approach [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009,24(1):88-95.
[15]
Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs:influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005,16(4):486-494.
[16]
Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, et al. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry:a three-dimensional finite element analysis [J]. J Prosthet Dent,2008,100(6):422-431.
[17]
Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Lin DJ, et al. Bone strain and interfacial sliding analyses of platform switching and implant diameter on an immediately loaded implant:experimental and threedimensional finite element analyses[J]. J Periodontol, 2009,80(7):1125-1132.
[18]
Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, et al. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations:the results of a randomized-controlled trial [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010,21(1):115-121.
[1] 刘远翔, 陈卓凡. 以拔牙窝萎缩性改变规律为基础的美学区即刻种植策略[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 407-412.
[2] 呙誉东, 周炼, 张东强. 帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 41-46.
[3] 封伟, 耿进友, 孙园园, 耿海霞, 薛敏. 锥形束CT辅助美学区种植评价唇侧骨量的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(04): 313-317.
[4] 王林虎, 施斌, 叶明福, 郭家平. 慢性牙周炎与种植牙相关性的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(01): 28-32.
[5] 招洛丹, 程露, 王肖, 彭志翔. 脂磷壁酸诱导根尖骨吸收调控蛋白的表达[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(05): 410-415.
[6] 刘大勇, 陈阵, 靳趁心, 刘士有. 血管内皮生长因子在雌激素缺乏大鼠牙周组织中的表达[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2007, 01(02): 73-77.
[7] 王继荣, 暴一众, 唐颖, 吕晓玲, 杨舟鑫. 吴茱萸碱抑制破骨细胞分化延缓骨丢失的研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 86-92.
[8] 付海瑞, 杨露阳, 梁斌, 刘强. 抗骨吸收药对骨修复的影响:一项随机对照研究的系统综述和meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 35-43.
[9] 吴石磊, 刘勇, 邵增务, 田青. 骨组织细胞外泌体对骨代谢作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(05): 308-311.
[10] 马晓龙, 刘强, 吴斗, 郑上团. 骨转换标志物在骨质疏松诊治中的分析评价及临床应用前景[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(01): 52-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要