切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 265 -268. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2022.04.011

综述

微动力系统在下颌低位阻生牙拔除中的研究进展
李娜1, 范亚伟2,†()   
  1. 1. 山西医科大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科，太原　030001
    2. 山西医科大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科，太原　030001；山西医科大学第一医院口腔颌面外科，太原　030001
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-09 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 范亚伟

Research progress of micropower systems in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (Class C, Pell & Gregory)

Na Li1, Yawei Fan2,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanxi Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanxi Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Taiyuan 030001, China; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2022-05-09 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yawei Fan
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李娜, 范亚伟. 微动力系统在下颌低位阻生牙拔除中的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 265-268.

Na Li, Yawei Fan. Research progress of micropower systems in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (Class C, Pell & Gregory)[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 265-268.

下颌低位阻生第三磨牙拔除术是牙槽外科中较为复杂的手术。近几年，随着微创技术在口腔领域的快速发展，传统拔牙技术已逐渐被取代。为使微创拔牙安全舒适高效，外科专用涡轮手机、超声骨刀和增速手机等微动力器械已逐渐应用于临床。每种微动力器械各具优势与不足，部分医师开始尝试将其联合使用。本文从优势互补、微创高效和少去骨、多分牙的角度出发，就各种最新微动力系统的优缺点及其联合使用辅助拔除下颌低位阻生牙做一阐述，使其优势互补，从而为临床医师及患者提供更多最佳选择。

关键词: 外科专用涡轮手机, 种植机, 超声骨刀, 增速手机

The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (Class C, Pell & Gregory) is a complicated operation in alveolar surgery. In recent years, with the rapid development of minimally invasive techniques in the field of dentistry, traditional extraction techniques have been gradually replaced. To make tooth extraction safe, comfortable, efficient and minimally invasive, high-speed dental handpieces, piezo-surgery, speed-increasing contra-angle handpieces and other micropower equipment have been gradually applied in clinical practice. Such micropower devices have their own advantages and disadvantages, such that the combined use of them has been found in clinic. Based on the complementarity, the degree of invasiveness, efficiency as well as the concept of less bone removal and more teeth separation, this article discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the latest micropower systems and their combined use in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, so as to provide clinicians and patients with more options.

Key words: High-speed dental handpiece, Implanter, Piezos-urgery, Speed-increasing contra-angle handpiece
[1]
Arta SA，Pourabbas Kheyradin R，Mesgarzadeh AH，et al. Comparison of the influence of two flap designs on periodontal healing after surgical extraction of impacted third molars[J]. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects，2011，5（1）：1-4. DOI：10.5681/joddd.2011.001.
[2]
Le SH，Nguyen NM，Nguyen NT，et al. Anatomical positions of mesially/horizontally impacted mandibular third molars are significant predictors for distal caries in adjacent second molars[J]. Int J Dent，2022：8482209. DOI：10.1155/2022/8482209.
[3]
Peñarrocha-Diago M，Camps-Font O，Sánchez-Torres A，et al. Indications of the extraction of symptomatic impacted third molars. A systematic review[J]. J Clin Exp Dent，2021，13（3）：e278-e286. DOI：10.4317/jced.56887.
[4]
Guillaumet-Claure MA，Juiz-Camps AM，Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of intraoperative and postoperative iatrogenic mandibular fractures after lower third molar extraction：A systematic review[J]. J Clin Exp Dent，2022，14（1）：e85-e94. DOI：10.4317/jced.58390.
[5]
Kilpatrick HC. Removal of impacted third molars utilizing speeds up to 200，000 r.p.m[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol，1958，11（4）：364-369. DOI：10.1016/0030-4220(58)90073-2.
[6]
胡开进，李永锋.牙槽外科新进展[J].实用医院临床杂志，2014，11（3）：14-17.
[7]
Lempel E，Szalma J. Effect of spray air settings of speed-increasing contra-angle handpieces on intrapulpal temperatures，drilling times，and coolant spray pattern[J]. Clin Oral Investig，2022，26（1）：523-533. DOI：10.1007/s00784-021-04030-3.
[8]
齐小良，张丽军.气动牙挺与传统牙挺用于不同难度牙拔除术效果比较[J].人民军医，2021，64（12）：1279-1281+1283. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1000-9736.2021.12.033.
[9]
郭竹玲，黄厂，冉秋池，等.一种同步可视化牙科手机的研发与应用[J].中国医疗器械信息，24（21）：26+33. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2018.21.010.
[10]
Emery RW，Korj O，Agarwal R. A review of in-office dynamic image navigation for extraction of complex mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2017，75（8）：1591-1600. DOI：10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.031.
[11]
Pavlíková G，Foltán R，Horká M，et al. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2011，40（5）：451-457. DOI：10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.013.
[12]
Gülnahar Y，Hüseyin Köşger H，Tutar Y. A comparison of piezosurgery and conventional surgery by heat shock protein 70 expression[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2013，42（4）：508-510. DOI：10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.027.
[13]
Al-Delayme RMA. Randomized clinical study comparing Piezoelectric Surgery with conventional rotatory osteotomy in mandibular third molars surgeries[J]. Saudi Dent J，2021，33（1）：11-21. DOI：10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.010.
[14]
D′Alessandro D，Ricci C，Milazzo M，et al. Piezoelectric Signals in vascularized bone regeneration[J]. Biomolecules，2021，11（11）：1731. DOI：10.3390/biom11111731.
[15]
Vucetic M，Freilich M，Marija MS，et al. The effect of piezosurgery on the oxidative stress and immediate post extraction discomfort following complex teeth extractions prior to implant placement[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2018，29：467. DOI：10.1111/clr.352_13358.
[16]
Martins M，Vieira WA，Paranhos LR，et al. Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in schneider′s membrane sinus lifting：A pilot randomized trial[J]. J Clin Exp Dent，2021，13（8）：e802-e808. DOI：10.4317/jced.57953.
[17]
Petroni G，Passaretti A，Zaccheo F，et al. Lingual flap protection during third molar surgery：A literature review[J]. Eur J Dent，2021，15（4）：776-781. DOI：10.1055/s-0041-1730042.
[18]
El Mobadder M，Nammour S，Ortega M，et al. Photobiomodulation therapy applied after 6 months for the management of a severe inferior alveolar nerve injury[J]. Life（Basel），2021，11（12）：1420. DOI：10.3390/life11121420.
[19]
Nehme W，Fares Y，Abou-Abbas L. Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery：A randomized clinical trial[J]. BMC Oral Health，2021，21（1）：393. DOI：10.1186/s12903-021-01759-x.
[20]
Alrefai M，Daboul A，Fleischhacker B，et al. Piezoelectric versus conventional techniques for orthognathic surgery：Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Stomatol，Oral and Maxillofac Surg，2022，123（5）：e273-e278. DOI：10.1016/j.jormas.2021.12.005.
[21]
Valente NA，Cosma L，Nocca G，et al. Piezoelectric device versus conventional osteotomy instruments in the comparison of three different bone harvesting methods：An istomorphometric，phonometric，and chronometric evaluation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants，2019，34（5）：1070-1077. DOI：10.11607/jomi.7309.
[22]
Gulnahar Y，Alpan AL. Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery：A split-mouth clinical study[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal，2021，26（3）：e269-e275. DOI：10.4317/medoral.24085.
[23]
Sayed N，Bakathir A，Pasha M，et al. Complications of third molar extraction：A retrospective study from a tertiary healthcare centre in Oman[J]. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J，2019，19（3）：e230-e235. DOI：10.18295/squmj.2019.19.03.009.
[24]
Aniko-Włodarczyk M，Jaroń A，Preuss O，et al. Evaluation of the effect of surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the second molar-prospective study[J]. J Clin Med，2021，10（12）：2655. DOI：10.3390/jcm10122655.
[25]
Rotella M，Ercoli C，Funkenbusch PD，et al. Performance of single-use and multiuse diamond rotary cutting instruments with turbine and electric handpieces[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2014，111（1）：56-63. DOI：10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.003.
[26]
Ercoli C，Rotella M，Funkenbusch PD，et al. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part Ⅱ：electric handpiece and comparison with turbine[J]. J Prosthet Dent，2009，101（5）：319-331. DOI：10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60064-0.
[27]
Campbell SC. Are friends electric？：A review of the electric handpiece in clinical dental practice[J]. Dent Update，2013，40（3）：194-196，199-200. DOI：10.12968/denu.2013.40.3.194.
[28]
Watson TF，Flanagan D，Stone DG. High and low torque handpieces：Cutting dynamics，enamel cracking and tooth temperature[J]. Br Dent J，2000，188（12）：680-686. DOI：10.1038/sj.bdj.4800576.
[29]
Spagnolo AM，Sartini M，Cristina ML. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines and potential risk of infection：A narrative review[J]. Pathogens，2020，9（8）：651. DOI：10.3390/pathogens9080651.
[30]
Allison JR，Edwards DC，Bowes C，et al. The effect of high-speed dental handpiece coolant delivery and design on aerosol and droplet production[J]. J Dent，2021，112：103746. DOI：10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103746.
[31]
向国林，李林林，魏钰璋，等.超声骨刀联合45°反角涡轮钻拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床应用[J].口腔医学研究，2020，36（7）：674-677. DOI：10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.07.015.
[32]
Srivastava P，Shetty P，Shetty S. Comparison of surgical outcome after impacted third molar surgery using piezotome and a conventional rotary handpiece[J]. Contemp Clin Dent，2018，9（Suppl 2）：S318-S324. DOI：10.4103/ccd.ccd_354_18.
[33]
白希婧，吕东升，周贤，等.增速手机配合种植机与高速涡轮机在下颌低位阻生智齿中的应用比较[J].广东医学，2020，41（4）：349-352. DOI：10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20193284.
[34]
李方，王涛，苏智勇，等.低速直机配合高速涡轮机微创拔牙法的临床研究[J].实用中西医结合临床，2021，21（9）：98-99. DOI：10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2021.09.049.
[1] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[2] 许志杰, 杨蕊, 杜国勇, 何奋军, 余丽佳, 吴纪楠. 两种微动力系统在上颌埋伏多生牙拔除术中应用的比较[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 221-226.
[3] 肖佳灵, 徐国超. STA无痛麻醉仪结合超声骨刀在抗凝血治疗老年人残根拔除术中的应用[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2020, 07(01): 36-40.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号