切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 197 -199. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2020.03.012

所属专题: 口腔医学 文献

综述

牙片屏障即刻种植术
房俊艳1, 王明臻2, 宋倩1, 邱立新3,()   
  1. 1. 山东大学齐鲁医院桓台分院·桓台县人民医院口腔科,淄博 256400
    2. 青岛市口腔医院修复科 266003
    3. 北京大学口腔医院第四门诊部 100025
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-09 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 邱立新

Socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: a systematic review

Junyan Fang1, Mingzhen Wang2, Qian Song1, Lixin Qiu3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Huantai Branch, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Zibo 256400, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, Qingdao Stomatological Hospital, Qingdao 266003, China
    3. Fourth Clinical Division, Peking University Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100025, China
  • Received:2020-02-09 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Lixin Qiu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qiu Lixin, Email:
引用本文:

房俊艳, 王明臻, 宋倩, 邱立新. 牙片屏障即刻种植术[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 197-199.

Junyan Fang, Mingzhen Wang, Qian Song, Lixin Qiu. Socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: a systematic review[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 197-199.

唇侧牙槽嵴顶的位置及高度是保证前牙种植美学效果的关键因素。牙齿拔除后,唇侧骨板,尤其牙槽嵴顶区2 ~ 3 mm处首先发生吸收,继而引发牙槽骨三维方向的变化,软组织塌陷,成为美学修复难点。常规拔牙即刻种植技术的主要问题也是修复后常见的唇侧龈缘退缩,影响最终美学修复效果。牙片屏障即刻种植术是近年来逐渐开展起来的一项新的即刻种植技术,但是关于此项新技术还有一些问题值得探讨,如此技术的理论基础、适应证的把握、外科技术的要点(唇侧牙片的大小、形态、种植体的选择等)、长期美学效果及并发症的处理。本文就此作一综述。

In Implant Dentistry, the buccal alveolar ridge contour in the esthetic area has been confirmed as one of the key elements to obtain a high esthetic outcome. However, tooth extraction is always followed by the resorption of labial alveolar bone, especially in the most coronal 2 ~ 3 mm area, which can then cause dimensional changes in the remnant alveolar bone and severe gingival margin recession damaging the pink aesthetic outcome of peri-implant tissue. Therefore, immediate implant placement has been a significant challenging treatment modality for the clinician. The recently popularized socket shield technique involves intentional retention of a section of the remnant root at the time of immediate implant placement, thereby preserving the buccal bone from resorption. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the literature available on the socket shield technique and summarize its theoretical basis, indications and surgical essentials, as well as the long-term clinical outcomes and management of complications.

[1]
Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Herten M,et al. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir,2007,11(2):89-97. DOI:10.1007/s10006-007-0050-z.
[2]
Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol,2005,32(2):212-218. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
[3]
Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P,et al. The socket-shield technique:a proof-of-principle report[J]. J Clin Periodontol,2010,37(9):855-862. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.
[4]
Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites[J]. Periodontol 2000,2017,73(1):73-83. DOI:10.1111/prd.12167.
[5]
Roe P, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Residual root preparation for socket-shield procedures:a facial window approach[J]. Int J Esthet Dent,2017,12(3):324-335.
[6]
朱一博,邱立新,陈硌,等.上前牙区牙片屏障即刻种植术临床效果的初步研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2018,53(10):665-668. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2018.10.004.
[7]
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial Extraction Therapies (PET)Part 1:Maintaining Alveolar Ridge Contour at Pontic and Immediate Implant Sites[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2016,36(5):681-687. DOI:10.11607/prd.2783.
[8]
Huang H, Shu L, Liu Y,et al. Immediate Implant Combined With Modified Socket-Shield Technique:A Case Letter[J]. J Oral Implantol,2017,43(2):139-143. DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00107.
[9]
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial Extraction Therapies (PET)Part 2:Procedures and Technical Aspects[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2017,37(3):377-385. DOI:10.11607/prd.3111.
[10]
Tan Z, Kang J, Liu W,et al. The effect of the heights and thicknesses of the remaining root segments on buccal bone resorption in the socket-shield technique:An experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2018,20(3):352-359. DOI:10.1111/cid.12588.
[11]
Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S,et al. The socket-shield technique:first histological,clinical,and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment—a pilot study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2015,17(1):71-82. DOI:10.1111/cid.12076.
[12]
Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S,et al. Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement - clinical,radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2017,28(11):1450-1458. DOI:10.1111/clr.13012.
[13]
Han CH, Park KB, Mangano FG. The modified socket shield technique[J]. J Craniofac Surg,2018,29(8):2247-2254. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004494.
[14]
Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T,et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:the pink esthetic score [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2005,16(6):639-644. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
[15]
闫圣杰,周聪,刘金,等.上颌前牙区应用根膜技术即刻种植的临床效果观察[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2019,37(6):615-620. DOI:10.7518/hxkq.2019.06.008.
[16]
Sun C, Zhao J, Liu Z,et al. Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket-shield technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes:A randomized clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2020,31(2):181-191. DOI:10.1111/clr.13554.
[17]
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites:Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2018,20(2):122-129. DOI:10.1111/cid.12554.
[1] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[2] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[9] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[10] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[11] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[12] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[13] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要