切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 230 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2017.04.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

成人双颌前突患者正畸治疗前后鼻唇颏关系的性别差异
谢永建1,(), 麦理想1, 许跃1   
  1. 1. 510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-13 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 谢永建

Sexual difference in the nose-lip-chin relationship of adults with bimaxillary protrusion before and after orthodontic treatment

Yongjian Xie1,(), Lixiang Mai1, Yue Xu1   

  1. 1. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2017-03-13 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongjian Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Yongjian, Email:
引用本文:

谢永建, 麦理想, 许跃. 成人双颌前突患者正畸治疗前后鼻唇颏关系的性别差异[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(04): 230-233.

Yongjian Xie, Lixiang Mai, Yue Xu. Sexual difference in the nose-lip-chin relationship of adults with bimaxillary protrusion before and after orthodontic treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(04): 230-233.

目的

研究成年双颌前突患者拔牙矫治前后软组织鼻唇颏的性别差异及治疗的变化。

方法

选取60例成年双颌前突患者,其中男25例、女35例。拔牙后采用直丝弓矫治技术矫治,对治疗前后的头颅侧位片测量分析,配对及独立样本t检验分析治疗前、治疗后男女患者的软组织鼻唇颏差异,男女性患者治疗前后的变化及两组患者变化的差异。

结果

治疗前女性患者鼻唇角(女86.23°、男91.86°,P= 0.033)及颏沟倾角(女61.03°、男68.19°,P= 0.014),上唇厚度(女8.99 mm、男10.87 mm,P= 0.000),下唇厚(女11.84 mm、男13.59 mm,P= 0.000)及颏厚度(女8.14 mm、男9.37 mm,P= 0.014)均明显小于男性,下唇突度(女7.90 mm、男6.40 mm,P= 0.023)较男性明显。正畸治疗后两组患者鼻唇角、颏沟倾角及颏厚度无明显差异;女性上唇长度(女23.25 mm、男25.06 mm,P= 0.001),下唇长度(女46.33 mm、男49.66 mm,P= 0.004)及上唇厚度(女10.98 mm、男13.58 mm,P= 0.000),下唇厚度(女12.31 mm、男14.39 mm,P= 0.000)均明显小于男性,下唇突度(女3.90 mm、男2.50 mm,P= 0.013)较男性明显。男女患者治疗后面型角、鼻唇角、颏沟倾角、上唇厚、颏厚度均明显增加,H角及上下唇突度均明显减小。男性患者上唇长度明显增加。男女性患者治疗前后的变化量及变化趋势均无明显差异。

结论

成年男女性双颌前突患者治疗前后软组织鼻唇颏关系均存在性别差异。正畸治疗对男女性患者的疗效是一致的,可明显改善侧貌突度和鼻唇颏关系的协调性,但不能消除软组织本身的性别差异。

Objective

To investigate the difference in the nose-lip-chin relationship of adult males and females with bimaxillary protrusion before and after orthodontic treatment as well as the difference between genders.

Methods

Sixty adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion, including 25 males and 35 females, were treated with straight wire technique, and cephalometrics were taken subquently. The difference in the nose-lip-chin relationship before and after treatment, and that between males and females were compared using paried and independent sample t test.

Results

The NLA (female vs male: 86.23° vs 91.86°, P= 0.033) , Pog′B′-FH (61.03° vs 68.19°, P= 0.014) , UL-U1 (8.99 mm vs 10.87 mm, P= 0.000) , LL-L1 (11.84 mm vs 13.59 mm, P= 0.000) and Pos′-Pos (8.14 mm vs 9.37 mm, P= 0.014) in females were statistically less than males. while LL-E (7.90 mm vs 6.40 mm, P= 0.023) was larger than males before treatment. After treatment, there was no difference in FCA, NLA, Pog′B′-FH and Pog′-Pog between males and females. The length and thickness of upper and lower lips were substantially less in females than that in males, while LL-E (3.90 mm vs 2.50 mm, P= 0.013) of females was larger than males. Both males and females had the same changes in FCA, NLA, H angle, Pog′B′-FH, UL-U1, Pog′-Pog, UL-E and LL-E after treatment, without significant difference between genders.

Conclusions

There was sexual difference in the nose-lip-chin relationship before and after treatment. Substantial treatment changes were observed both in males and females, and orthodontic treatment can improve the facial profile and the harmony of nose-lip-chin relationship.

图1 软组织标志点及测量项目
表1 重度成年双颌前突患者正畸治疗前后软组织头影测量的不同性别间分析比较(±s
表2 重度成年双颌前突患者软组织头影测量同性别间正畸治疗前后变化的比较(±s
[1]
Carner LD. Soft-tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement[J]. Am J Orthod,1974,66(4):367-377.
[2]
Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postodolesent female patients[J]. Am J Orthod,1972,61(1):45-54.
[3]
周洪,叶湘玉,邹敏.成年女性双颌前突拔牙矫治前后的硬软组织的变化[J].口腔正畸学,1997,4(2):64-66.
[4]
孙旭容,林新平,邓勇,等.决定成年女性双颌前突治疗成功的变量研究[J].口腔医学研究,2006,22(3):310-313.
[5]
Jacobson A. Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthodontic surgery[J]. Angle Orthod,1984,54(1):18-35.
[6]
Yogosawa F. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment[J]. Angle Orthod,1990,60(1):199-206.
[7]
罗卫红,王壬.影响双颌前突错侧貌的软硬组织相关分析[J].空军总医院学报,2000,16(4):217-219.
[8]
Kurkcuoglu A, Pelin C, Ozener B,et al. Facial soft tissue thickness in individuals with different occlusion patterns in adult Turkish subjects[J]. Homo,2011,62(4):288-297.
[9]
Kamak H, Celikoglu M. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions:is there a difference?[J]. Korean J Orthod,2012,42(1):23-31.
[10]
霍娜,段银钟,韩春,等.腭杠腭托联合支抗矫治双颌前突的临床研究[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(1):70-72
[11]
Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery[J]. J Oral Surg,1980,38(10):744-751.
[12]
Chen F, Chen Y, Yu Y,et al. Age and sex related measurement of craniofacial soft tissue thickness and nasal profile in the Chinese population[J]. Forensic Sci Int,2011,212(1-3):272.e1-e6.
[13]
Cha KS. Soft-tissue thichness of South Korean adults with normal faxial profiles[J]. Korean J Orthod,2013,43(4):178-185.
[14]
Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V,et al. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxilllary protrusion. A systematic review[J]. Angle Orthod,2010,80(1):211-216.
[15]
林铭,王大为.成人双颌前突错畸形患者拔牙正畸治疗后颅面软硬组织的变化[J/CD].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2009,3(4):424-429.
[1] 谢珍艳, 曾小龙, 黄文汉, 钟国庆, 陈浩斌, 马立敏, 肖进, 张余. 健康大学生平地步行时髋关节三维运动学特征研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 568-575.
[2] 韵向东, 姜金, 安丽萍, 夏亚一. 骨关节炎患者胫骨平台偏心距性别差异分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 64-68.
[3] 董永伟, 陈宇, 郑文, 贺晓楠. 性别对ST段抬高型心肌梗塞患者院前延迟时间的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(06): 376-379.
[4] 邓建清, 卢新华, 彭彩霞, 邓立迪, 吴莉萍. 双颌前突患者口颌面部肌电特征研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(05): 273-277.
[5] 罗泽龙, 李志芳. 微种植钉在正畸治疗双颌前突伴露龈笑中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(05): 405-408.
[6] 吕红芝, 王娟, 宇文培之, 李栋正, 陈伟, 张英泽. 2016年至2018年河北医科大学第三医院骨盆骨折住院患者的特征分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 228-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要