切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 489 -492. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.06.010

所属专题: 文献

口腔护理

胃肠减压在口腔癌根治同期修复重建患者中的应用
黄秋雨1, 何杏芳1, 杨冬叶1, 苏华凤1, 林丽婷1,(), 侯劲松1   
  1. 1. 510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-11 出版日期:2015-12-01
  • 通信作者: 林丽婷

Efficacy of gastro-intestinal decompression in oral cancer patients undergoing resection and reconstruction

Qiuyu Huang1, Xingfang He1, Dongye Yang1, Huafeng Su1, Liting Lin1,(), Jinsong Hou1   

  1. 1. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2015-06-11 Published:2015-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Liting Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Liting, Email: , Tel: 020-83830621
引用本文:

黄秋雨, 何杏芳, 杨冬叶, 苏华凤, 林丽婷, 侯劲松. 胃肠减压在口腔癌根治同期修复重建患者中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(06): 489-492.

Qiuyu Huang, Xingfang He, Dongye Yang, Huafeng Su, Liting Lin, Jinsong Hou. Efficacy of gastro-intestinal decompression in oral cancer patients undergoing resection and reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(06): 489-492.

目的

探讨口腔癌根治同期修复重建术应用胃肠减压的临床效果。

方法

选择中山大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科行口腔癌根治同期修复重建术患者230例。2010年12月至2013年2月住院手术患者115例为非胃肠减压组,术后未行胃肠减压,于术后第1天予留置胃管并进行鼻饲流质。2013年3月至2014年8月住院手术患者115例为持续胃肠减压组,于术中进行留置胃管,术后即予持续胃肠减压,术后第1天予鼻饲流质。统计持续胃肠减压组与非胃肠减压组术后恶心呃逆、呕吐、返流误吸及吸入性肺炎的发生率,采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法比较分析即刻持续胃肠减压在口腔癌根治同期修复重建患者中的作用。

结果

非胃肠减压组术后出现恶心呃逆17例(14.78%)、呕吐26例(22.61%)、吸入性肺炎2例(1.74%)。持续胃肠减压组术后出现恶心呃逆5例(4.35%)、呕吐2例(1.74%),未出现吸入性肺炎。持续胃肠减压组采用即刻持续胃肠减压方法后,其术后呕吐(χ2 = 23.410,P = 0.003),恶心呃逆(χ2 = 7.238,P = 0.008)与胃肠反应发生率(χ2 = 33.120,P = 0.005)均低于非胃肠减压组,差异有统计学意义。

结论

口腔癌根治和修复重建手术患者术后给予持续胃肠减压可减少患者术后恶心呃逆、呕吐的发生,预防术后创口感染,利于皮瓣成活,并可通过引流液性质和引流量动态观察患者术后口内创口渗血情况,及时发现病情的变化,有利于患者安全。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of gastro-intestinal decompression in oral cancer patients who undergo resection and reconstruction surgery.

Methods

Two hundred and thirty oral cancer patients undergoing resection and reconstruction surgery were selected from department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University. The patients were divided into two groups: Control group (n = 115) , and the experimental group (n = 115) . Patients hospitalized from December 2010 to February 2013 were included into the control group, and patients hospitalized from March 2013 to August 2014 were included into the experimental group. The experimental group was indwelled gastric tube at the onset after operation and gave a postoperative continuous gastro-intestinal decompression. The patients were given nasal feeding on the first day after surgery. Comparing to the experimental group, patients in the control group did not undergo decompression during the surgery. And the patients were indwelled gastric tube and gave nasal feeding on the first day after surgery. The incidence rates of vomiting, nausea and gastrointestinal reaction were compared between the control group and the experimental group by Chi-square test and Fish exact probability method.

Results

In the control group, 17 patients were suffered from postoperative nausea and hiccups (the incidence rate is 14.78%) , 26 patients were suffered from vomiting (the incidence rate is 22.61%) , and 2 patients were suffered from aspiration pneumonia (the incidence rate is 4.35%) . In the experimental group, there were 5 patients suffering from hiccups and nausea (the incidence rate is 1.74%) , and 2 patients suffering from vomiting (the incidence rate is 1.74%) . In addition, aspiration pneumonia was not reported in the control group. The incidence of vomiting (χ2 = 23.410, P = 0.003) , nausea and hiccups (χ2 = 7.238, P = 0.008) as well as gastrointestinal reaction (χ2 = 33.120, P = 0.005) of the experimental group were markedly lower than that in the control group.

Conclusions

Giving continuous decompression to the oral cancer patients after resection and reconstruction surgery can reduce postoperative nausea, hiccups and vomiting, which prevents postoperative wound infection and benefit to flap survival. Moreover, changes in condition of patients can be detected through observing the nature of drainage fluid, which is helpful for patient safety.

表1 持续胃肠减压组与非胃肠减压组手术方式比较(例)
表2 口腔癌修复重建术患者采用胃肠减压与否的恶心呃逆情况(例)
表3 口腔癌修复重建术后患者呕吐情况(例)
表4 口腔癌修复重建术患者采用胃肠减压与否的胃肠反应情况(例)
表5 口腔癌修复重建术患者采用胃肠减压与否的吸入性肺炎情况(例)
[1]
Kim SH,Shin YS,Oh YJ,et al. Risk assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the intravenous patient-controlled analgesia environment:predictive values of the Apfel′s simplified risk score for identification of high-risk patients[J]. Yonsei Med J,2013,54(5):1273-1281.
[2]
Drew SJ. Best Practices for Management of Pain,Swelling,Nausea,and Vomiting in Dentoalveolar Surgery[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,2015,27(3):393-404.
[3]
娄皓,柏压玲,孙静,等. 胃肠减压预防喉癌术后胃部不适的临床观察[J]. 中华护理杂志,2008,43(3):239-240.
[4]
黄秋雨,何杏芳,陈莺,等. 颌骨放射性骨坏死并发胃食管返流误吸的护理干预[J/CD]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志:电子版,2010,4(6):622-625.
[5]
蔡娟,赵娟,周娜,等. 正颌外科术后鼻饲葡萄糖氯化钠溶液对减轻患者胃部不适的效果[J]. 中华护理杂志,2012,47(3):228-230.
[6]
田沈平,王玚. 胃肠减压对减少头颈肿瘤术后胃肠不良反应的影响[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2006,22(2):24-25.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 史博慧, 丁西萍, 王恋, 李茸, 郭萍利, 齐晶, 陈瑶, 郝娜, 任予. 乳腺癌术后皮下积液防治的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 277-284.
[3] 韩春茂. 解决慢性创面患者医疗服务最后一公里[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 460-460.
[4] 蔡柔妹, 曾洁梅, 黄伟丽, 谢文敏, 刘燕丹, 吴漫君, 蔡楚燕. 利用QC小组干预降低经烧伤创面股静脉置管导管相关性感染发生率的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 399-404.
[5] 李晨曦, 谭小容, 魏巍, 李慕秋, 龚忠诚. 三级淋巴结构在口腔癌中的特征及意义[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-321.
[6] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[7] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[8] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[11] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[12] 李梅, 孔珊珊. Robocare护理模式联合高频胸壁振荡在腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[13] 方红燕, 刘晓昌, 方家旭. 腹部按压联合综合护理在腹壁造口旁疝患者肠镜检查中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-629.
[14] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要