切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 478 -483. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2015.06.008

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

冠周局部注射地塞米松预防下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症
胡飚1, 周媛2, 刘兴光3, 陶谦3,†()   
  1. 1. 510220　广州市海珠区口腔医院综合科
    2. 510000　广州市第八人民医院口腔科
    3. 510055　广州，中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院，广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-12 出版日期:2015-12-01
  • 通信作者: 陶谦

Effect of pericoronal local injection of dexamethasone to prevent postoperative complication in the third molar impaction surgery

Biao Hu1, Yuan Zhou2, Xingguang Liu3, Qian Tao3,†()   

  1. 1. Department of General, Stomatological Hospital of Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510220, China
    2. Department of Stomatology, the Eighth People′s Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China
    3. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2015-06-12 Published:2015-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Qian Tao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tao Qian, Email: , Tel: 020-83846030
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

胡飚, 周媛, 刘兴光, 陶谦. 冠周局部注射地塞米松预防下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(06): 478-483.

Biao Hu, Yuan Zhou, Xingguang Liu, Qian Tao. Effect of pericoronal local injection of dexamethasone to prevent postoperative complication in the third molar impaction surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(06): 478-483.

目的

评价拔牙术前或术后行地塞米松冠周局部注射（下颌第三磨牙颊侧组织，磨牙后三角区以及咀嚼肌区）在下颌第三磨牙拔除术后肿胀，疼痛及张口受限的预防效果。

方法

对240例患者的下颌第三磨牙依照阻生类型进行三种方法拔除，对三组牙拔除方式的患者分别列为实验组（拔牙术前冠周局部注射地塞米松组和拔牙术后注射地塞米松组）和对照组（拔牙术前术后均未注射地塞米松），对患者术后第1、3、7天进行随访分析，对患者肿胀指数，疼痛程度和张口受限程度进行统计，并作统计学分析。实验组之间，以及实验组与对照组之间的比较采用卡方检验，以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

在拔牙术后第1天和第7天，术前或术后冠周局部注射地塞米松组与未注射地塞米松组在肿胀指数，疼痛程度和张口受限程度差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；术后第3天，术前或术后冠周局部注射地塞米松组较对照组在肿胀反应中具有更好的疗效（P<0.05），在疼痛和张口受限程度中具有一定的预防、治疗效果（P>0.05）。术前或术后冠周局部注射地塞米松对拔牙后肿痛反应及张口受限程度差异无统计学意义。

结论

拔牙术前或术后冠周局部注射地塞米松可有效的预防下颌第三磨牙拔除术后肿胀、疼痛反应以及张口受限的发生。

关键词: 磨牙，第三，下颌, 地塞米松, 冠周局部注射, 拔牙, 手术后并发症
Objective

To assess the efficacy of dexamethasone (DM) pericoronal injection preoperative or postoperative for the control of swelling, pain and trismus caused by impacted mandibular third molars extraction.

Methods

Totally 240 consecutive patients requiring surgical removal of mandibular third molar were divided into three groups according to extraction of the impacted molars. Each of the three groups was split into experimental group (Dexamethasone pericoronal injection preoperative and postoperative) and control group (Non-pericoronal injection of Dexamethasone) , respectively. Swelling, pain and trismus were assessed by following-up evaluation at 1st, 3rd and 7th postoperative days.

Results

The statistics analysis showed similar result in the severity of swelling, pain and trismus at the experimental group and control group on 1st and 7th postoperative day. It was noticed that the experimental group promoted a better prognosis of swelling, pain and trismus. There was no difference between the groups of DM pericoronal injection preoperative and DM pericoronal injection postoperative on these parameters.

Conclusion

It appeared that DM pericoronal injection preoperative or postoperative would control swelling, pain and trismus following impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

Key words: Molar, third, mandibular, Dexamethasone, Pericoronal local injection, Tooth extraction, Postoperative complication
图1 下颌第三磨牙拔除术后颌面部肿胀评估定点及连线示意图
表1 240例下颌第三磨牙拔除术患者性别、年龄分布及拔牙时间
组别 例数 年龄（岁， ± s） 性别（例） 拔牙时间（min， ± s）
男 女
Aa组 30 26.77 ± 6.78 16 14 12.67 ± 4.50
Ab组 30 27.23 ± 5.48 17 13 12.13 ± 4.43
Ac组 30 25.73 ± 4.70 17 13 12.63 ± 3.86
Ba组 30 26.97 ± 4.84 16 14 19.80 ± 4.60
Bb组 30 25.87 ± 5.50 16 14 20.20 ± 4.69
Bc组 30 27.63 ± 5.42 18 12 19.77 ± 4.52
Ca组 20 26.45 ± 3.82 10 10 22.05 ± 4.56
Cb组 20 27.05 ± 5.10 11 9 21.30 ± 4.35
Cc组 20 28.10 ± 5.21 10 10 22.55 ± 5.02
表2 240例下颌第三磨牙拔除术后患者颌面部肿胀指数统计（cm， ± s）
组别 例数 术后第1天 术后第3天 术后第7天
Aa组 30 1.58 ± 0.59 2.50 ± 1.22 0.75 ± 0.81
Ab组 30 1.64 ± 0.60 2.38 ± 1.07 0.78 ± 0.70
Ac组 30 1.92 ± 0.77 2.99 ± 0.96 0.97 ± 0.85
Ba组 30 1.92 ± 0.59 2.62 ± 0.63 0.87 ± 0.69
Bb组 30 2.02 ± 0.59 2.67 ± 0.78 0.86 ± 0.69
Bc组 30 2.19 ± 0.45 3.08 ± 0.63 0.90 ± 0.78
Ca组 20 1.94 ± 0.49 2.74 ± 0.78 0.79 ± 0.58
Cb组 20 1.96 ± 0.51 2.67 ± 0.77 0.70 ± 0.50
Cc组 20 2.09 ± 0.46 3.22 ± 0.64 0.71 ± 0.41
表3 240例下颌第三磨牙拔除术后患者疼痛程度比较（%）
组别 例数 术后第1天 术后第3天 术后第7天
Aa组 30 63.3 86.7 90.0
Ab组 30 60.0 86.7 90.0
Ac组 30 50.0 80.0 93.3
Ba组 30 43.3 66.7 90.0
Bb组 30 46.7 63.3 83.3
Bc组 30 36.7 60.0 83.3
Ca组 20 75.0 70.0 90.0
Cb组 20 40.0 55.0 75.0
Cc组 20 70.0 40.0 70.0
表4 240例下颌第三磨牙拔除术后患者张口受限程度比较（%）
组别 例数 术后第1天 术后第3天 术后第7天
Aa组 30 76.6 80.0 96.7
Ab组 30 70.0 73.3 90.0
Ac组 30 56.7 66.7 83.3
Ba组 30 76.7 80.0 96.7
Bb组 30 76.7 73.3 93.3
Bc组 30 73.3 66.7 90.0
Ca组 20 65.0 65.0 80.0
Cb组 20 60.0 60.0 75.0
Cc组 20 50.0 45.0 55.0
[1]
Worrall SF，Riden K，Haskell R，et al. UK National Third Molar project：the initial report[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg，1998，36(1):14-18.
[2]
Agostinho CN，de Silva VC，Maia Filho EM，et al. The efficacy of 2 different doses of dexamethasone to control postoperative swelling，trismus，and pain after third molar extractions[J]. Gen Dent，2014，62(6):1-5.
[3]
Schultze-Mosgau S，Schemlzeisen R，Frölich JC，et al. Use of ibuprofen and methylprednisolone for the prevention of pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg，1995，53(1):2-7.
[4]
Danda AK，Krishna Tatiparthi M，Narayanan V，et al. Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling - a comparative and split mouth study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2010，68(2):309-312.
[5]
Mavrodi A，Ohanyan A，Kechagias N，et al. Influence of two different surgical techniques on the difficulty of impacted lower third molar extraction and their post-operative complications[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal，2015，20(5):e640-e644.
[6]
Hashemi HM，Beshkar M，Aghajani R. The effect of sutureless wound closure on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted mandibular third molar surgery[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2012，50(3):256-258.
[7]
Li C，Men M，Li L. Discrepancies on dexamethasone for trismus after third molar extraction[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol，2014，117(2):253.
[8]
Murugesan K，Sreekumar K，Sabapathy B. Comparison of the roles of serratiopeptidase and dexamethasone in the control of inflammation and trismus following impacted third molar surgery[J]. Indian J Dent Res，2012，23(6):709-713.
[9]
Grossi GB，Maiorana C，Garramone RA，et al. Effect of submucosal injection of dexamethasone on postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery：a prospective study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2007，65(11):2218-2226.
[10]
Majid OW. Submucosal dexamethasone injection improves quality of life measures after third molar surgery：a comparative study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2011，69(9):2289-2297.
[11]
Claseman TS，Foley WL，Davis RD，et al. A clinical evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of preoperative administration of ketorolac and dexamethasone following surgical removal of third molars[J]. Anesth Prog，1998，45(3):110-116.
[12]
Alexander RE，Throndson RR. A review of perioperative corticosteroid use in dentoalveolar surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod，2000，90(4):406-415.
[13]
Rana M，Warraich R，Faisal M，et al. Evaluation of postoperative discomfort following third molar surgery using submucosal dexamethasone - a randomized observer blind prospective study[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol，2013，116(1):16-22.
[14]
Chaudhary PD，Rastogi S，Gupta P，et al. Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone injection and consumption on post-operative swelling，pain，and trismus after third molar surgery. A prospective，double blind and randomized study[J]. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res，2015，5(1):21-27.
[15]
Pandurić DG，Brozović J，Sušić M，et al. Assessing health-related quality of life outcomes after the surgical removal of a mandibular third molar[J]. Coll Antropol，2009，33(2):437-447.
[1] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[2] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[3] 贾杰, 王阳, 车凯薇, 高俊峰, 王聪, 李泽阳, 梁虎. 梭形针线扣技术与Krackow缝合法对跟腱止点或近止点断裂跟腱功能恢复的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 307-313.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[10] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[11] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[12] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[13] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[14] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[15] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？