切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (03) : 317 -321. doi: 10.3877 / cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2009-03-014

临床研究

微钛钉种植体支抗在上颌前突正畸治疗中的临床应用
李惠忠1,(), 杨光1   
  1. 1.523000 东莞市人民医院口腔科
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-16 出版日期:2009-06-01
  • 通信作者: 李惠忠

Clinical application of micro-implant for orthodontic anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion

Hui-zhong LI1,(), Guang YANG1   

  1. 1.Department of Stomatology, Dongguan Municipal People's Hospital, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2009-03-16 Published:2009-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Hui-zhong LI
引用本文:

李惠忠, 杨光. 微钛钉种植体支抗在上颌前突正畸治疗中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2009, 3(03): 317-321.

Hui-zhong LI, Guang YANG. Clinical application of micro-implant for orthodontic anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2009, 3(03): 317-321.

目的

探讨微钛钉种植体支抗在上颌前突矫治中的临床应用及其与传统支抗的区别。

方法

选择上颌前突拔牙矫正的患者40 例,随机分成实验组和对照组,每组20 例。实验组使用微钛钉种植体作为支抗关闭间隙,对照组使用常规滑动法关闭间隙,治疗前后利用X 线头颅片进行测量分析对比。

结果

所有病例矫治后,上前牙突度及轴倾度得到改善,拔牙间隙均关闭。 实验组与对照组上中切牙切缘到Y 轴距离(U1-Y)分别平均减少4.78 mm与2.63 mm,上中切牙长轴与前颅底平面形成的后下夹角(U1-SN)分别平均减少16.62°与13.75°,上、下中切牙长轴之间的夹角(U1-L1)分别平均增大20.86°与13.66°;两组治疗前后数值的差异均有统计学意义。而矫治后实验组U1-Y 平均增大0.27 mm,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),对照组平均增大3.16 mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

微钛钉种植体支抗可避免上颌磨牙的前移,能为上颌前突畸形的矫治提供有效的支抗来源。

Objective

To investigate the efficiency of micro-implant for orthodontic anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion.

Methods

40 patients with maxillary protrusion were randomly divided into two groups, with 20 patients in each group. Micro-implants were used in experimental group as the orthodontic anchorage to close the space, and traditional sliding technology was used in control group. Cephalometric radiographies were taken and analyzed before and after treatment.

Results

In all patients the protrusion and sagittal inclination of anterior teeth were improved significantly and the extraction space was closed. For the experimental and control group the average reduction of U1-Y was 4.78 mm and 2.63 mm, and U1-SN was 16.62°and 13.75°, respectively; The average increase of U1-L1 was 20.86° and 13.66° respectively.There was a significant difference before and after treatment in two groups. In U1-Y, the experimental group, there was no significant increase after treatment when compared to pretreatment (0.27 mm, P>0.05), while significant difference was found for the control group (3.16 mm, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Micro-implant could be an efficient method to reinforce the orthodontic anchorage and avoid the forward movement of maxillary molar in the treatment of maxillary protrusion malocclusion.

图1 X 线头影测量项目 1:U6-Y(上第一磨牙冠近中点到Y 轴的距离); 2:L1-Y(下中切牙切缘到Y 轴的距离); 3:U1-Y(上中切牙切缘到Y 轴的距离); 4:U1-SN(上中切牙长轴与前颅底平面形成的后下夹角); 5:L1-MP(下中切牙长轴与下颌平面所形成的后上夹角); 6:U1-L1(上、下中切牙长轴之间的夹角)
表1 实验组治疗前后X 线头影测量分析(±s,n=20)
表2 对照组治疗前后X 线头影测量分析(±s,n=20)
表3 实验组与对照组治疗前后X 线头影测量分析差值的比较(±s)
1
蒋旭梅,孙一春,卢山,等. 滑动直丝技术矫治安氏Ⅰ类错 合牙 的临床应用研究. 口腔正畸学, 2004,11(3):116-118.
2
刘鑫,段银钟,刘岚. 微小种植体支抗与传统强支抗在成人双颌前突尖牙远移中的比较. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2004,20(2):143-146.
3
Roberts WE. When planning to use an implant for anchorage,how long do you have to wait to apply force after implant placement? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002,121(1):14.
4
Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006,130(3):391-402.
5
Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage:a praliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1998,13(3):201-209.
6
Bae SM, Park HS, Kyung HM, et al. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 2002,36(5):298-302.
7
Büchter A, Wiechmann D, Koerdt S, et al. Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005,16(4):473-479.
8
Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T, et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001,119(5):489-497.
[1] 张铮, 张国志, 李飒, 熊国平. 腭部专用正畸支抗种植体Straumann Orthosystem Implant[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(02): 167-171.
[2] 高翔, 林和平, 包柏成. Headgear-Twinblock 矫治器治疗垂直生长型骨性早期Ⅱ类错 的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2009, 3(02): 206-211.
阅读次数
全文


摘要