切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 294 -298. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2018.05.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

负压封闭引流在颌面外科术后严重颌面颈部感染的应用
龙静1, 黄谢山1,(), 潘小萌1, 陈灼庚1   
  1. 1. 570208 海口,中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院口腔医学中心颌面外科·海南省口腔医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-30 出版日期:2018-10-01
  • 通信作者: 黄谢山

Application of vacuum sealing drainage in severe maxillofacial and neck infections after oral and maxillofacial surgery

Jing Long1, Xieshan Huang1,(), Xiaomeng Pan1, Zhuogeng Chen1   

  1. 1. Hainan Stomatology Center, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou 570208, China
  • Received:2018-05-30 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xieshan Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Xieshan, Email:
引用本文:

龙静, 黄谢山, 潘小萌, 陈灼庚. 负压封闭引流在颌面外科术后严重颌面颈部感染的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 294-298.

Jing Long, Xieshan Huang, Xiaomeng Pan, Zhuogeng Chen. Application of vacuum sealing drainage in severe maxillofacial and neck infections after oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 294-298.

目的

探讨应用持续负压封闭引流技术(VSD)治疗口腔颌面外科术后经持续换药后未见明显好转、且呈持续性加重的颌面颈部感染的疗效。

方法

采用VSD治疗8例口腔颌面外科术后经持续换药未见好转、且呈持续性加重的严重颌面颈部感染,在去除术后感染区坏死物质、彻底清创后,以负压封闭引流材料覆盖创口,0.9%氯化钠溶液冲洗,持续负压引流,直至引流液清亮、创缘组织无红肿、无压痛后,撤除VSD装置。

结果

6例患者明确感染后,使用传统换药约7 ~ 8 d,感染呈进行性加重,遂使用VSD装置置于感染区,持续引流5 ~ 15 d后,可见引流液清亮,颌面部肿胀基本消失,创缘周围可见肉芽组织增生,伤口基本愈合;所有病例中有1例为放射性颌骨骨髓炎行腓骨肌皮瓣修复,明确感染、持续换药约20 d后,感染呈进行性加重,放置VSD 5 d后于手术室清除病灶骨,术后继续换药,伤口愈合;1例术后并发食管瘘患者使用VSD时间长,撤除VSD后,引流液清亮,颌面部肿胀较前明显减轻,创口可见肉芽组织增生,但左颈部仍可见到1个大小约1 cm × 1 cm的瘘管,邻近瘘管可见颈部膨隆明显,扪诊质硬,无波动感。左颈部磁共振成像(MRI)增强示:左颈部见3.9 cm × 2.3 cm × 5.0 cm大小的不规则占位病变,右颈部见1个大小约2.3 cm × 1.4 cm团块状病变,考虑淋巴结肿大(术后复发)。

结论

VSD有利于控制感染,防止术后感染扩散,促进术后创面组织的愈合;同时肿瘤患者使用VSD存在促癌细胞转移、增殖的可能,在应用过程中应充分考虑其适应证,并密切监测创区变化,当发现可疑病变或创面延迟愈合时,应立即撤除VSD装置,根据具体情况行进一步治疗。

Objective

To observe the effect of continuous negative pressure drainage vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of aggravated postoperative infection in maxillofacial and cervical area.

Methods

VSD was used to treat severe maxillofacial infection in 8 cases after oral and maxillofacial surgery which had not been improved and continued to be aggravated. After removal of the necrotic substance and comprehensive debridement in the postoperative infection, the wound was covered with vacuum sealing drainage materials washed by 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution, and drainaged by the continuous negative pressure. The VSD device was removed until the drainage fluid was clear and the wound tissue was free from swelling and tenderness.

Results

After a clear infection of the 6 cases and traditional exchange was used about 7-8 days, the infection was not improved but progressively aggravated. Then the VSD device was placed in the infection area. After 5-15 days′ continuous drainage, the drainage fluid was clear while the swelling of the maxillofacial region disappeared basically, and proliferation of the granulation tissue was seen around the wound and all the wounds healed basically. In one case, the patient was diagnosed as radioactive osteomyelitis of the jaws and repaired with fibular myocutaneous flap. After definite infection and 20 days′ continuous change of medicine, the infection showed progressive aggravation. After placing VSD for 5 days in the operation area, the focal bone was cleared in operating room. After the operation, we continued to change the fresh dressing on the wound, and the wound was healed. One case of postoperative patients with esophageal fistula used the VSD for a long time. After removal of VSD, the drainage fluid was clear, and the swelling of the maxillofacial region was lightened and granulation tissue hyperplasia was seen around the wound. But we could still see a 1 cm × 1 cm fistula on the left neck. MRI enhancement in the left neck showed an irregular occupying lesion of the 3.9 cm × 2.3 cm × 5.0 cm size in the left neck, and an approximately 2.3 cm × 1.4 cm lump lesion in the right neck, considering the swelling of the lymph nodes (postoperative recurrence) .

Conclusions

The VSD is beneficial to control infection, prevent postoperative infection spread and promote healing of wound tissue. It is possible to move and proliferate cancer cells at the same time while using VSD. In the process of application, the indications should be fully considered, and the changes of the invasive region should be closely monitored. When the suspicious lesion or wound were found to be delayed healing, the VSD device should be removed and further treatment should be done according to the specific conditions.

表1 本研究入选的8例患者基本情况汇总表
图1 负压封闭引流技术(VSD)使用方法
表2 本研究8例患者在感染不同阶段创面的基本情况、疗效评价及时长情况
[1]
Fleischmann W,Strecker W,Bombelli M,et al. Vacuum sealing as treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures[J]. Unfallchirurg,1993,96(9):488-492.
[2]
裘华德,王彦峰.负压封闭引流技术介绍[J].中国实用外科杂志,1998,18(4):233-234.
[3]
齐东元,张锐,赵元龙,等.负压封闭引流技术在治疗严重颌面颈部感染中的应用[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2017,33(6):824-826.
[4]
章功杰,陈松军,郑珉,等.持续负压引流术治疗严重颌面颈部间隙感染的探讨[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2015,33(4):393-396.
[5]
张大明,王友元,梁启祥,等.负压封闭引流技术在头颈部恶性肿瘤根治重建后下颌下瘘口中的应用评价[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2015,13(5):452-455.
[6]
张大明,王友元,梁启祥,等.负压封闭引流技术在游离前臂皮瓣修复术后供区植皮中的应用[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2015,13(4):370-372.
[7]
刘燕. 2123例口腔颌面外科患者抗菌药物使用的相关因素分析[J].抗感染药学,2013,10(3):223-226.
[8]
潘晓玲,王巧云.口腔颌面外科患者术后感染的病原菌及相关因素分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2018,5(12):28-29.
[9]
徐斌,石宇远,徐明,等.口腔颌面外科患者术后感染的病原菌及相关因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2017,27(10):2329-2331.
[10]
赵电红,杨桂琴,何青宁,等.口腔颌面外科住院患者抗菌药物应用调查分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2009,9(2):91-93.
[11]
田忠奇,刘慧,胡露露,等.口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤患者术后术区感染危险因素分析[J].中国美容医学,2017,26(4):67-70.
[12]
鲍东昱,鲁勇.放射性颌骨骨髓炎研究进展[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2016,9(6):379-382.
[13]
刘小利,王玲,李新磊,等. VSD应用于重症颌面颈部多间隙感染的疗效评价[J].中国美容医学,2017,26(1):80-83.
[14]
俞丹,陈舜岳,王姝,等.闭式冲洗留置负压引流口腔颌面部间隙感染的临床研究[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(4):108-110.
[15]
杨帆.物理负压促进创面愈合机制的研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2010.
[16]
杜仲,黄昕,闫子玉,等.封闭负压引流术(VSD)应用进展[J].口腔医学,2016,36(7):670-672.
[17]
Morykwas MJ,Simpson J,Punger K,et al. Vacuum-assisted closure:state of basic research and physiologic foundation[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2006,117(7 Suppl):121S-126S.
[18]
刘雪,朱同娥,魏霞,等.自制负压引流装置不同负压值对创面愈合效果的影响观察[J].中国美容医学,2017,26(10):41-43.
[19]
Shi B,Sun J,Cao Y,et al. Application of vacuum sealing drainage to the treatment of seawater-immersed blast-injury wounds[J]. Int Wound J,2016,13(6):1198-1205.
[20]
Liu X,Liang J,Zao J,et al. Vacuum Sealing Drainage Treatment Combined with Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement for Treatment of Soft Tissue Defects and Infection[J]. Med Sci Monit,2016(22):1959-1965.
[21]
Tan L,Hou Z,Gao Y. Efficacy of combined treatment with vacuum sealing drainage and recombinant human epidermal growth factor for refractory wounds in the extremities and its effect on serum levels of IL-6,TNF-α and IL-2[J]. Exp Ther Med,2018,15(1):288-294.
[22]
杨洪,徐文举,郭蕾,等.封闭负压引流(VSD)技术与传统换药技术治疗深度烧伤的临床疗效比较[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2015,12(1):122-124.
[23]
刘三风,刘志豪,戴志波.负压封闭引流技术(VSD)对各种复杂创面修复的临床研究[J].当代医学,2009,15(6):66-68.
[24]
Hompland T,Ellingsen C,Øvrebø KM,et al. Interstitial fluid pressure and associated lymph node metastasis revealed in tumors by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Cancer Res,2012,72(19):4899-4908.
[25]
Irkoren S,Sivrioglu N,Karaca H. Rare complication after VAC therapy in the treatment of tissue defect due to surgical excision of pilonidal sinus[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2013,40(6):641-643.
[1] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[2] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[3] 廖锵云, 王震, 林洁玉, 廖夏, 邓锦华, 李杰峰, 邓建维, 李明, 荣新洲. 虎门地区创伤弧菌感染的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 394-398.
[4] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[7] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[8] 李金璞, 饶向荣. 抗病毒药物和急性肾损伤[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 287-290.
[9] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[10] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[14] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要