切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 227 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2018.04.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

流体力学分析说话瓣膜对下颌骨缺损重建患者气管切开后功能恢复的影响
郑燕娜1, 梁玉洁1,(), 杨乐1, 卢涣滋1, 廖贵清1   
  1. 1. 510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-07 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 梁玉洁
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81772894、81672679); 中山大学临床医学研究5010计划(20100018); 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20130171120125)

The effect of speaking valve on functional restoration in tracheostomised patients after reconstruction of madibular defects based on the fluid dynamics analysis

Yanna Zheng1, Yujie Liang1,(), Le Yang1, Huanzi Lu1, Guiqing Liao1   

  1. 1. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2018-02-07 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yujie Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Yujie, Email:
引用本文:

郑燕娜, 梁玉洁, 杨乐, 卢涣滋, 廖贵清. 流体力学分析说话瓣膜对下颌骨缺损重建患者气管切开后功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 227-233.

Yanna Zheng, Yujie Liang, Le Yang, Huanzi Lu, Guiqing Liao. The effect of speaking valve on functional restoration in tracheostomised patients after reconstruction of madibular defects based on the fluid dynamics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 227-233.

目的

运用流体力学的方法,研究佩戴说话瓣膜(SV)对围术期气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者误吸、口腔分泌物、嗅觉及发音的影响。

方法

根据纳入标准及排除标准入组的8例患者按随机数字表法随机分成瓣膜组及对照组。瓣膜组予术后第2天佩戴SV,对照组不予佩戴SV,观察患者误吸、口腔分泌物、嗅觉、发音情况。吞咽功能采用染色实验,口腔分泌物采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS),患者能正确回答易挥发分子的气味即嗅觉功能阳性,能进行简单的言语交流即发音功能阳性。采用锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描,Mimics和Gambit、Fluent软件,三维重建两组患者气道模型和气道流场,应用SPSS 23.0软件对比分析两组间术前、术后咽腔及声门下腔压力的变化,数据结果以中位数(25%值,75%值)表示。

结果

两组相比,瓣膜组4例均改善误吸、嗅觉及发音,口腔分泌物明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组术前、术后声门下压分别为101 327.00 Pa(101 326.25,101 327.75)、101 270.00 Pa(101 269.25,101 270.75);瓣膜组佩戴SV后恢复声门下气压,术前、术后声门下压均为101 327.00 Pa(101 326.25,101 327.75),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

围术期气管切开患者佩戴SV能够减少误吸风险,改善嗅觉功能,此外,恢复患者言语交流能力,缓解患者围术期焦虑,有利于患者顺利度过围术期。因此,下颌骨缺损血管化腓骨复合组织瓣修复重建患者气管切开后运用SV值得推广运用。

Objective

The purpose of the present study was to observe the influence of speaking valve (SV) on aspiration, oral secretions, olfaction, and the phonation in perioperative tracheostomised patients with fibular flap reconstruction of mandibular defects based on fluid dynamics analysis.

Methods

Eight tracheotomised patients with fibular flap reconstruction of mandibular defects were divided into two groups, the SV group and control group. The SV group were asked to wear SV two days after the tracheostomy while the control group weren′t treated with SV. And the differences were compared between the two groups on aspiration, oral secretion, olfaction and phonation. Dye test was used to assess deglutition functions; visual analog scale (VAS) was adopted to measure oral secretions; patients can correctly answer the odor of volatile molecules were positive function of olfaction; patients can conduct language exchange were positive function of phonation. Two groups were scanned by CBCT before and after the surgery respectively and three-dimensional models were reconstructed with CBCT data by Mimics. The internal flow of upper respiratory tract was simulated by Gambit and Fluent software, and the differences between two groups on the pressure of pharyngeal cavity and infraglottic cavity were compared by SPSS 23.0 software, and the data results are demonstrated with the median (25%, 75%) .

Results

There were significant differences between two groups, four patients of SV group had improvement in deglutition, oral secretion, olfaction and phonation (P<0.05) . The preoperative and postoperative pressures of infraglottic cavity in control group were 101 327.00 Pa (101 326.25, 101 327.75) and 101 270.00 Pa (101 269.25, 101 270.75) respectively, while the preoperative and postoperative pressure of infraglottic cavity in SV group were both 101 327.00 Pa (101 326.25, 101 327.75) , with no statistical significance (P>0.05) .

Conclusions

The application of SV can significantly decrease aspiration and oral secretion, improve olfactory function, and restore the communication ability for the perioperative tracheostomised patients underwent fibular flap reconstruction of mandibular defects, which helps patients safely go through the perioperative period. Therefore, SV is suitable to be applied in perioperative tracheotomised patients with fibular flap reconstruction of madibular defects.

图1 上呼吸道三维重建模型
图2 上呼吸道三维重建模型截面的选取示意图
表1 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术后误吸比较(例)
表2 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术后嗅觉功能比较(例)
表3 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术后发音功能比较(例)
表4 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术后口腔分泌物比较(例)
图3 上呼吸道中纵断面压力云图
图4 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术前、术后平均咽腔压力的比较
图5 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术前、术后平均声门下腔压力的比较
表5 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术前、术后咽腔压力的比较[Pa,M(25%值,75%值)]
表6 瓣膜组与对照组气管切开下颌骨缺损重建患者术前、术后声门下腔压力的比较[Pa,M(25%值,75%值)]
[1]
张胜,马壮,余志刚, 等. 气管切开术在口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤手术治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中国医药指南, 2013, 11(7):111-112.
[2]
窦祖林. 吞咽障碍评估与治疗[M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2017:100-102, 239-248, 551-555.
[3]
沙毅. 流体力学[M]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2016:13-30.
[4]
Cuh DC,Park ST,Oh TS, et al. High shear stress at the surface of enhancing plaque in the systolic phase is related to the symptom presentation of severe M1 stenosis[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2011, 12(4):515-518.
[5]
Campbell IC,Timmins LH,Giddens DP, et al. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Hemodynamics in Plaque Erosion[J]. Cardiovasc Eng Technol, 2013, 4(4):464-473.
[6]
Pirnar J,Dolenc-Grošelj L,Fajdiga I, et al. Computational fluid-structure interaction simulation of airflow in the human upper airway[J]. J Biomech, 2015, 48(13):3685-3691.
[7]
Huang R,Li X,Rong Q. Control mechanism for the upper airway collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome:a finite element study[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2013, 56(4):366-372.
[8]
Iwasaki T,Takemoto Y,Inada E, et al. The effect of rapid maxillary expansion on pharyngeal airway pressure during inspiration evaluated using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 78(8):1258-1264.
[9]
Yajima Y,Oshima M,Iwai T, et al. Computational fluid dynamics study of the pharyngeal airway space before and after mandibular setback surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46(7):839-844.
[10]
Shah DH,Kim KB,McQuilling MW, et al. Computational fluid dynamics for the assessment of upper airway changes in skeletal ClassⅢ patients treated with mandibular setback surgery[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016, 86(6):976-982.
[11]
Fiorelli A,Ferraro F,Nagar F, et al. A Aew Modified Evans Blue Dye Test as Screening Test for Aspiration in Tracheostomized Patients[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2017, 31(2):441-445.
[12]
Brown CV,Hejl K,Mandaville AD, et al. Swallowing dysfunction after mechanical ventilation in trauma patients[J]. J Crit Care, 2011, 26(1):108.e9-13.
[13]
Kim YK,Lee SH,Lee JW, et al. Effect of Capping of the Tracheostomy Tube in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2017, 41(3):426-433.
[14]
Seo HG,Kim JG,Nam HS, et al. Swallowing Function and Kinematics in Stroke Patients with Tracheostomies[J]. Dysphagia, 2017, 32(3):393-400.
[15]
Jung SJ,Kim DY,Kim YW, et al. Effect of decannulation on pharyngeal and laryngeal movement in post-stroke tracheosto-mized patients[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2012, 36(3):356-364.
[16]
Kennedy WP,Lewis CP,Stow J, et al. A Critical Period in Postnatal Neuroplasticity of Olfaction:A Pediatric Tracheostomy Model[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 142(2):127-131.
[17]
Horowitz LF,Saraiva LR,Kuang D, et al. Olfactory receptor patterning in a higher primate[J]. J Neurosci, 2014, 34(37):12241-12252.
[18]
Doty RL. The olfactory system and its disorders[J]. Semin Neurol, 2009, 29(1):74-81.
[19]
李胜利. 语言治疗学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:154-156.
[20]
万桂芳,窦祖林,丘卫红, 等. 说话瓣膜的应用对气管切开并吞咽障碍患者渗漏和误吸的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2012, 27(10):949-951.
[21]
Prigent H,Lejaille M,Terzi N, et al. Effect of a tracheostomy speaking valve on breathing-swallowing interaction[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2012, 38(1):85-90.
[22]
Sutt AL,Cornwell P,Mullany D, et al. The use of tracheostomy speaking valves in mechanically ventilated patients results in improved communication and does not prolong ventilation time in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients[J]. J Crit Care, 2015, 30(3):491-494.
[23]
Gross RD,Carrau RL,Slivka WA, et al. Deglutitive subglottic air pressure and respiratory system recoil[J]. Dysphagia, 2012, 27(4):452-459.
[24]
Kim YK,Lee SH,Lee JW, et al. Effects of Capping of the Tracheostomy Tube in Stroke Patients with Dysphagia[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2017, 41(3):426-433.
[25]
Shikani AH,Dietrich-Burns K. Comparison of speech parameters and olfaction using different tracheotomy speaking valves[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2012, 2(4):348-353.
[26]
Adam SI,Srinet P,Aronberg RM, et al. Verbal communication with the Blom low profile and Passy-Muir one-way tracheotomy tube speaking valves[J]. J Commun Disord, 2015(56):40-46.
[27]
Brigger MT,Hartnick CJ. Drilling speaking valves:a modification to improve vocalization in tracheostomy dependent children[J]. Laryngoscope, 2009, 119(1):176-179.
[28]
Buckland A,Jackson L,Ilich T, et al. Drilling speaking valves to promote phonation in tracheostomy-dependent children[J]. Laryngoscope, 2012, 122(10):2316-2322.
[29]
Stranix JT,Danziger KM,Dumbrava VL, et al. Technique to Improve Tracheostomy Speaking Valve Tolerance after Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction[J]. Plasti Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2016, 4(12):e1082.
[30]
符碧洲,郭永亮. 佩戴说话瓣膜对气切患者呼吸功能的影响[J]. 医学信息, 2015, 28(15):213-213.
[31]
Chelluri L,Im KA,Belle SH, et al. Long-term mortality and quality of life after prolonged mechanical ventilation[J]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32(1):61-69.
[32]
Needham DM,Korupolu R,Zanni JM, et al. Early physical medicine and rehabilitation for patients with acute respiratory failure:a quality improvement project[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 91(4):536-542.
[33]
Parker A,Sricharoenchai T,Needham DM. Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit:Preventing Physical and Mental Health Impairments[J]. Curr Phys Med Rehabi Rep, 2013, 1(4):307-314.
[1] 于振超, 康骅. 老年乳腺癌患者围手术期的评估与处理[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 177-180.
[2] 袁琳, 王静, 朱红艳, 陈雅雪, 马彩玲. 加速康复外科在妇科微创手术围术期应用的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(06): 733-738.
[3] 马鹏涛, 毛玉陆, 赵广利, 李瑞博, 张燕, 孙秀艳. 快速康复外科理念在老年患者首次单膝关节置换术围手术期中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(06): 509-514.
[4] 顾太梅, 钱叶本, 王丽, 赵欣婉, 王海进, 杨玲. 精准外科结合快速康复理念在肝癌术围术期处理中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 384-387.
[5] 王坚, 杨传鑫. 胆囊癌外科规范治疗的难点与焦点[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 137-141.
[6] 王慧君, 卢俊杰, 郑卫华, 张俊晶. 脾脏疾病腹腔镜手术治疗现状及围手术期管理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 653-656.
[7] 勾善淼, 殷涛, 熊炯炘, 杨明, 彭涛, 周伟, 王博, 王春友, 吴河水. 胰腺癌根治术患者围手术期新辅助治疗的安全性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 453-457.
[8] 郭傧, 刘志承, 周一, 冷超, 肖震宇. 人工智能助力加速康复外科发展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 547-550.
[9] 李国林, 王秀, 陈桂婵, 邱逸红. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术围手术期标准化管理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 510-513.
[10] 谢敖文, 于毅, 彭欣然, 王攀, 廖辉军. 亚肝段切除在肝细胞癌根治性切除术中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 290-295.
[11] 蒋闯, 廖明恒, 曾勇. 糖尿病对肝切除术患者围手术期情况的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 82-86.
[12] 陈子祥, 刘付宝, 陈江明, 方强, 濮天. CNLC-Ⅰb期巨大肝癌外科治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 511-514.
[13] 李宏亮, 田野, 马燕娟, 朱宁, 苏芮, 石广志, 周建新. 经皮扩张气管切开术标准操作流程在神经重症患者中的应用[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 219-227.
[14] 王彦旭, 何益港, 秦永林. 计算流体力学研究B型主动脉夹层中4D Flow MRI的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 159-163.
[15] 王燕, 郭蕊, 王淑杰. 老年烧伤气管切开患者死亡风险诊断模型构建及对策分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 249-253.
阅读次数
全文


摘要