切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -47. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2018.01.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

微创牵引复位外伤挫入年轻恒牙的临床疗效观察
徐丹1, 何旭顺1, 高志雄1, 曾琪1, 梁燕桃1, 黄芳1,()   
  1. 1. 510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-19 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 黄芳
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81371107、81470760)

Clinical observation on minimally invasive orthodontic extrusion of intruded immature central incisors

Dan Xu1, Xushun He1, Zhixiong Gao1, Qi Zeng1, Yantao Liang1, Fang Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2017-11-19 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Fang Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Huang Fang,Email:
引用本文:

徐丹, 何旭顺, 高志雄, 曾琪, 梁燕桃, 黄芳. 微创牵引复位外伤挫入年轻恒牙的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 37-47.

Dan Xu, Xushun He, Zhixiong Gao, Qi Zeng, Yantao Liang, Fang Huang. Clinical observation on minimally invasive orthodontic extrusion of intruded immature central incisors[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 37-47.

目的

研究微创正畸牵引复位无自发萌出能力的外伤挫入年轻恒牙的临床疗效。

方法

选择年轻恒牙外伤挫入的患者8例,年龄7~ 11岁,共11颗上颌切牙,其中9颗重度挫入、2颗中度挫入。观察1个月以上,确定无自发萌出能力后,采用如下微创正畸牵引方式复位:(1)"2 × 4"镍钛弓丝技术:单颗牙中度挫入,邻牙萌出3/4以上;(2)活动基托牵引:重度根向挫入、邻牙萌出不足1/2或伴脱位性损伤;(3)活动基托牵引联合"2 × 4"镍钛弓丝技术:重度唇向或腭向挫入,邻牙萌出不足1/2或伴脱位性损伤。观察治疗后患牙萌出状况、牙根吸收、边缘骨缺损和(或)牙髓变化情况。

结果

(1)患牙萌出状况:所有挫入牙均复位;(2)牙根吸收情况:4颗牙出现轻微根吸收,2颗牙牵引前出现根尖部和根中段侧方低密度影,治疗完成时低密度影消退,余牙均无牙根吸收;(3)边缘骨缺损情况:除2颗牙外均无边缘骨缺损;(4)牙髓活力状况:3颗牙齿发育Nolla 10期的挫入牙,牵引前即行牙髓摘除术,4颗牵引中行牙髓摘除术,4颗牙髓活力正常,其中1颗根管钙化。

结论

无萌出潜力的挫入年轻恒牙可根据其挫入方向及邻牙萌出程度和受伤情况,分别选择"2 × 4"镍钛弓丝技术、活动基托牵引技术或活动基托联合"2 × 4"镍钛弓丝牵引技术,及时进行微创牵引,可有效复位挫入牙,避免牙根吸收,减少边缘骨缺损,并可能保存活髓,值得进一步推广。

Objective

To observe the clinical outcomes of traumatically intruded young permanent teeth after using a minimal invasive orthodontic repositioning method.

Methods

Eight patients aged from 7 to 11 years old presenting dental trauma were admitted to our department. A total of 11 injured maxillary incisors, with 9 severely intruded and 2 moderately intruded. All teeth were observed for spontaneous re-eruption for at least 1 month, before initiating orthodontic repositioning. Minimal invasive orthodontic repositioning were possible using the following method: (1) "2 × 4" nickel titanium wire appliance: single tooth moderately intruded with adjacent teeth erupted above 3/4; (2) removable appliance: severely and vertically intruded tooth, with adjacent teeth erupted less than 1/2 or traumatically dislocated; (3) removable appliance and "2 × 4" nickel titanium wire appliance: severely buccal or palatal intruded tooth, with adjacent teeth erupted less than 1/2 or traumatically dislocated. During the re-eruption status, pulp necrosis, loss of gingival attachment, marginal bone loss, root resorption and the condition of adjacent teeth were observed.

Results

(1) Re-eruption status: all the teeth were repositioned in good alignment with the adjacent teeth; (2) root resorption: 4 teeth showed mild root resorption. 2 teeth showed evidence of obvious periapical and lateral radiolucency before the repositioning, which were ceased and healed at the end of the treatment; (3) marginal bone loss: 2 teeth showed mild marginal bone loss; (4) pulp status: 3 mature teeth were root-treated with calcium hydroxide paste before the repositioning, 4 immature teeth were treated during the treatment, and 4 teeth maintained pulp vitality, one tooth showed root canal calcification.

Conclusions

If the traumatically intruded teeth show no signs of re-eruption, depending on the direction of intrusion, the stage of eruption of the adjacent teeth and the severity of the trauma, immediate repositioning should be initiate. "2 × 4" nickel titanium wire appliance, removable appliance or even the use of both in one unit should be a feasible choice to effectively reposition dislocated tooth, avoid root absorption, reduce the occurrence of marginal bone loss, and maintained pulp vitality.

表1 外伤挫入患儿治疗前的基础情况
图1 病例1患者治疗过程影像学资料
图2 病例1患者治疗过程临床照片资料
图3 病例2患者治疗过程临床照片资料
图4 病例2患者治疗过程影像学资料
图5 病例3患者治疗过程影像学资料
图6 病例3患者治疗过程临床照片资料
图7 病例4患者影像学资料(治疗前后对比)
图8 病例4患者治疗过程临床照片资料
图9 病例4患者影像学资料(治疗过程)
图10 病例5患者治疗过程临床照片资料
图11 病例5患者治疗过程影像学资料
[1]
郑树国.儿童牙外伤Ⅳ.年轻恒前牙挫入和半脱位的临床处理[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2011,46(9):571-574.
[2]
Andreasen JO,Bakland LK,Matras RC,et al. Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 1. An epidemiological study of 216 intruded permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol,2006,22(2):83-89.
[3]
Albadri S,Zaitoun H,Kinirons MJ. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry:treatment of traumatically intruded permanent incisor teeth in children[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent,2010(20 Suppl 1):1-2.
[4]
Diangelis AJ,Andreasen JO,Ebeleseder KA,et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the manage-ment of traumatic dental injuries:1. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol,2012,28(1):2-12.
[5]
Nazzal H,Dhaliwal HK,Littlewood SJ,et al. Interdisciplinary management of severe intrusion injuries in permanent incisors:a case series[J]. Br Dent J,2014,217(9):517-523.
[6]
Zhang Y,Zhu Y,Su W,et al. A retrospective study of pediatric traumatic dental injuries in Xi′an,China[J]. Dent Traumatol,2014,30(3):211-215.
[7]
Rodriguez Y Baena R,Lupi MS,Ceriana G,et al. Extrusion of severely impacted mandibular first molar using partial orthodontics and temporary anchorage miniscrews[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent,2016,17(4):310-314.
[8]
Fields HW,Christensen JR. Orthodontic procedures after trauma[J]. J Endod,2013,39(3 Suppl):S78-S87.
[9]
Andreasen JO,Bakland LK,Andreasen FM. Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 3. A clinical study of the effect of treatment variables such as treatment delay,method of repositioning,type of splint,length of splinting and antibiotics on 140 teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol,2006,22(2):99-111.
[10]
Chaushu S,Shapira J,Heling I,et al. Emergency orthodontic treatment after the traumatic intrusive luxation of maxillary inci-sors[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,126(2):162-172.
[11]
Medeiros RB,Mucha JN. Immediate vs late orthodontic extrusion of traumatically intruded teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol,2009,25(4):380-385.
[12]
Tsilingaridis G,Malmgren B,Andreasen JO,et al. Intrusive luxation of 60 permanent incisors:a retrospective study of treatment and outcome[J]. Dent Traumatol,2012,28(6):416-422.
[13]
Costa LA,Ribeiro CC,Cantanhede LM,et al. Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2017,46(2):214-229.
[14]
Andreasen FM,Kahler B. Pulpal response after acute dental injury in the permanent dentition:clinical implications-a review[J]. J Endod,2015,41(3):299-308.
[15]
Wigen TI,Agnalt R,Jacobsen I. Intrusive luxation of permanent incisors in Norwegians aged 6-17 years:a retrospective study of treatment and outcome[J]. Dent Traumatol,2008,24(6):612-618.
[16]
Andreasen JO,Bakland LK,Andreasen FM. Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 2. A clinical study of the effect of preinjury and injury factors,such as sex,age,stage of root development,tooth location,and extent of injury including number of intruded teeth on 140 intruded permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol,2006,22(2):90-98.
[17]
Gomes JC,Gomes CC,Bolognese AM. Clinical and histological alterations in the surrounding periodontium of dog′s teeth submit-ted for an intrusive luxation[J]. Dent Traumatol,2008,24(3):332-336.
[18]
Alkhalifa JD,Alazemi AA. Intrusive luxation of permanent teeth:a systematic review of factors important for treatment decision-making[J]. Dent Traumatol,2014,30(3):169-175.
[1] 刘晓雁, 徐飚, 林欢, 别凤杰, 陈前军. 腔镜技术在乳腺外科中的应用进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 229-234.
[2] 周围, 王泽强, 郭琼, 陈洲熙, 廖妮, 艾红艳, 胡壹, 黄彦, 谭米多, 易坚胜, 陈菁菁. 真空辅助微创旋切系统在伴粗钙化的乳腺肿块中的临床应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 117-118.
[3] 王琛, 于浩然, 郭灰灰, 尚贤波, 马赛, 尤星宇, 蔡德超, 马潇, 张浩天, 卞阿帅, 程文丹. 微创全膝关节置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 339-344.
[4] 迟方舟, 张涛, 符诗坚, 曹博然, 王浩君, 王继隆, 王文波, 王玉鹏. 国产股骨柄假体在前路髋关节置换中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 243-247.
[5] 郭晓忠. 股骨头坏死早期保髋手术的选择与疗效评定[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 191-194.
[6] 岳聚安, 郭晓忠, 王冉东, 李兵, 孙强, 刘忘言, 陈蛟. 单中心前瞻性研究囊性变对早期股骨头坏死微创保髋手术后疗效的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 207-212.
[7] 唐健雄, 李绍春, 李绍杰. 中国腹腔镜疝手术20年回顾与展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 603-605.
[8] 杨德法, 王克俭, 李耀. 真空辅助旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿块的效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 562-565.
[9] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石微创治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 585-588.
[10] 郭世龙, 杨潇, 胡欢欢, 杨梁, 周文富, 丛魁武, 张雨胜, 李英锋. ERCP在胆胰疾病微创治疗中的有效性及安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 216-220.
[11] 罗发, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜肝切除治疗肝细胞癌现状及挑战[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 128-132.
[12] 李志伟, 齐瑞兆, 赵新, 常伟华, 常正尧, 张鹰, 王胜智, 梁峰. 门静脉高压症脾切除切口微创化发展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 17-20.
[13] 王栋, 阴继凯, 董瑞, 鲁建国. 门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式单中心经验[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 21-26.
[14] 陈博滔, 成伟. 青年外科医师腹腔镜胆道手术学习曲线和成长之路——单中心团队体会[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 143-146.
[15] 李汉军, 梅洪亮, 卢绮萍. 困难胆管结石的外科微创治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 115-121.
阅读次数
全文


摘要