切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (06) : 539 -543. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2012.06.013

经验交流

双侧髁突骨折分类和治疗探讨
宿文涛1,()   
  1. 1.261400 山东省莱州市第三人民医院口腔科
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-27 出版日期:2012-12-01
  • 通信作者: 宿文涛

Classification of bilateral condylar fractures and their treatment evaluation

Wen-tao SU1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Stomotology, The Third People's Hospital, Laizhou 261400, China
  • Received:2012-07-27 Published:2012-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Wen-tao SU
引用本文:

宿文涛. 双侧髁突骨折分类和治疗探讨[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2012, 06(06): 539-543.

Wen-tao SU. Classification of bilateral condylar fractures and their treatment evaluation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2012, 06(06): 539-543.

目的

探讨一种双侧髁突骨折的分类方法,根据分类将双侧髁突骨折进行分别治疗,比较治疗后的关节功能。

方法

63 例双侧髁突骨折按照髁突是否骨折以及升支高度是否发生降低分成3 类,每类中有3 个亚类,采用保守治疗和手术治疗,术后6 个月检查最大张口度、张口偏斜、单侧侧方运动、双侧侧方运动、前伸运动、关节弹响及杂音、有无前牙开等。

结果

无一例患者出现前牙开,有6 例最大开口度小于35 mm,都在Ⅰ型双侧髁突骨折,Ⅱ型双侧髁突骨折出现单侧侧方运动障碍、前伸障碍、开口偏斜、关节弹响及杂音各占10%,Ⅲ型双侧髁突骨折无明显关节功能障碍。

结论

双侧髁突骨折应当根据不同的情况进行分类治疗,有无髁突骨折对于关节功能的预后有很大影响,是否有升支高度降低对于采用哪种治疗方法起决定作用。

Objective

This retrospective study is aimed to explore a new classification of bilateral condylar fracture and to evaluate the therapeutic effects according to the classification.

Methods

According to the fracture of the condylar head and the changes of the ramus height, 63 cases of bilateral condylar fractures were classified into 3 types, and each one then divided into 3 subtypes. The patients received conservative treatment or operation, respectively. 6 months later, maximal mouth opening,mandibular deviation during opening, lateral movements, protrusive movements, clicking of the temporomandibular joints and the anterior open-bite were examined.

Results

After the treatment, the anterior open-bite was not observed in these cases. 6 patients classified in type Ⅰof the bilateral condylar fracture showed that the maximal mouth opening was less than 35 mm. 10% cases in typeⅡpresented disorders in lateral or protrusive movements, mandibular deviation and clicking of the joints,respectively. No obvious dysfunction of the temporomandibular joints was found in type Ⅲ.

Conclusions

Different treatment should be applied to patients with bilateral condylar fracture according to the fracture type. The fracture of the condylar head leads to poor prognosis of the joint function, while the changes of the ramus height may decide the treatment selection.

图1 Ⅰ类骨折,双侧囊内骨折,双侧采用钢丝固定
图2 Ⅱ类骨折,右侧颈部,左侧囊内骨折,右侧钛板固定,左侧钢丝固定
图3 Ⅲ类骨折,双侧基部骨折,右侧采用钛板固定,左侧错位不明显,未处理
表1 本组63 例双侧髁突骨折分类及治疗方法(例)
表2 3 类骨折的关节功能检查结果(例)
1
Zachariades N, Mezitis M, Mourouzis C, et al. Fractures of the mandibular condyle:a review of 466 cases. Literature review,reflections on treatment and proposals. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg, 2006,34(7):421-432.
2
Loukota RA, Eckelt U, De Bont L, et al. Subclassification of fractures of the condylar process of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005,43(1):72-73
3
Neff A, Kolk A, Deppe H, et al. New aspects for indications of surgical management of intra-articular and high temporomandibular dislocation fractures. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir, 1999,3(1):24-29.
4
Loukota RA, Neff A, Rasse M. Nomenclature/classification of fractures of the mandibular condylar head. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,48(6):477-478.
5
Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation of fractures of the mandibular condylar process:a randomized, prospective, multicenter study with special evaluation of fracture level. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,66(12):2537-2544.
6
Chen CT, Feng CH, Tsay PK, et al. Functional outcomes following surgical treatment of bilateral mandibular condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,40(1):38-44.
7
Newman L. A clinic evaluation of the long-term outcome of patients treated for bilateral fracture of the mandibular condyles.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1998,36(3):176-179.
8
何冬梅,杨驰. 下颌骨髁突骨折的分类及治疗. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2010,3(4):200-203.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 张祖强, 李圳, 刘勇, 王振龙. 双反牵引外固定架结合髓内钉治疗胫骨多段骨折的临床疗效及骨折愈合的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(01): 13-21.
[3] 虞先濬. 胰腺肿瘤外科:外科学遇见肿瘤学——拥抱精准、走向卓越[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-27.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[6] 苏浩, 曹明誉, 郭一苇, 刘小彭. 前列腺增生术后压力性尿失禁相关研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 103-110.
[7] 朱洪浩, 范新祥. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第18期)——女性尿道癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 120-124.
[8] 徐涵治, 邱洵, 汪恺, 徐骁. 脂肪变性供肝脱脂策略的研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 18-24.
[9] 黄忠晶, 张丽东, 伍子奕, 艾军华. 不可切除肝细胞癌的转化治疗[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 41-45.
[10] 孙志鹏, 束斌, 王良, 黄鑫, 王鹏飞, 李广欣, 王小娟, 黎功, 杨世忠. 放疗联合靶向免疫新辅助治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的安全性与疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 92-96.
[11] 李伟男, 杨刚, 熊永福, 李强, 李敬东. 中晚期肝癌TACE 联合靶向免疫转化治疗后成功实施ALPPS 的初步经验[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 97-101.
[12] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病诊疗中国专家共识(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 1-12.
[13] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
[14] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[15] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要