切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (04) : 348 -352. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2012.04.008

临床研究

自酸蚀粘接剂Adper Easy One 的临床研究
韦曦1, 何庆银1, 凌均棨1,(), 林正梅1, 徐琼1, 刘建伟1, 麦穗1   
  1. 1.510055 广州,中山大学光华口腔医学院·附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-07 出版日期:2012-08-01
  • 通信作者: 凌均棨

Clinical study of Adper Easy One self-etch adhesive systems

Xi WEI1, Qing-yin HE1, Jun-qi LING1,(), Zheng-mei LIN1, Qiong XU1, Jian-wei LIU1, Sui MAI1   

  1. 1.Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China
  • Received:2011-11-07 Published:2012-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun-qi LING
引用本文:

韦曦, 何庆银, 凌均棨, 林正梅, 徐琼, 刘建伟, 麦穗. 自酸蚀粘接剂Adper Easy One 的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(04): 348-352.

Xi WEI, Qing-yin HE, Jun-qi LING, Zheng-mei LIN, Qiong XU, Jian-wei LIU, Sui MAI. Clinical study of Adper Easy One self-etch adhesive systems[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2012, 6(04): 348-352.

目的

评价一步法自酸蚀粘接剂Adper Easy One 一年复诊期内的临床效果。

方法

临床选择有2 颗恒磨牙面洞的患者27 例,按随机数表选择其中一颗牙使用Adper Easy one 自酸蚀粘接剂(自酸蚀组),另一颗牙使用Scotchbond 酸蚀剂及Adper Single Bond 2 粘接剂(全酸蚀组),两颗牙均充填Filtek Z350 树脂。 术后即刻、1 周、半年及1 年复诊评价术后敏感,并按USPHS/Ryge 标准评估充填体情况。

结果

自酸蚀组1 例发生术后敏感,全酸蚀组2 例发生术后敏感,两组差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。 全酸蚀组1 例充填体边缘不完整,自酸蚀组所有病例充填体边缘完整,两组差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。 所有充填体颜色匹配、解剖学形态、表面质地均在1 年复诊期内保持良好,未发生洞缘变色及继发龋。

结论

一步法自酸蚀粘接剂1 年复诊期内术后敏感发生率低,临床效果保持良好。

Objective

This study evaluated the clinical performance of a single-step self-etch adhesive system Adper Easy One over a one-year follow-up period.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients who had two permanent molar occlusal caries received following restorations:(1) single-step self-etching adhesive (Adper Easy one, 3M ESPE) was applied to one tooth following manufacturer's instructions;(2) two-step total-etching adhesive (Scotchbond, 3M ESPE; Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE) was applied to the other tooth as the control. Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) was used as the restorative composite for all restorations. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated, and the restorations were assessed according to USPHS/Ryge standard at baseline (instantly), after one week, half a year and one year of clinical service.

Results

Adper Easy One group had one case of postoperative sensitivity, while two cases in the total-etching adhesive group had postoperative sensitivity at one week visit, and there were no significant differences between the two groups (P >0.05). One restoration in the total-etching adhesive group lost marginal integrity at one-year recall, and all other restorations were clinically acceptable,without significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The indicators of color match, anatomical form and surface roughness maintained sound in all restorations, without marginal staining and secondary caries.

Conclusions

One year follow up showed low postoperative sensitivity rate and satisfactory clinical performance of the single-step self-etch adhesive system.

表1 充填体质量评分等级
图1 自酸蚀粘接剂组树脂充填病例照片 A. 术前; B.备洞; C.术后; D.术后1 周; E.术后半年; F.术后1 年
图2 全酸蚀粘接剂组树脂充填病例照片 A.术前; B.备洞; C.术后; D.术后1 周; E.术后半年; F.术后1 年
1
Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 1955,34(6):849-853.
2
Gordan VV, Mjör IA. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent, 2002,27(6):543-548.
3
Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J, 1980,30(4):347-358.
4
Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Geraldeli S, et al. Six-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin. J Adhes Dent, 2001,3(4):343-352.
5
Van Meerbeek B, De Munok J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent, 2003,28(3):215-235.
6
Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, et al. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent, 2001,29(1):7-13.
7
Owens BM, Johnson WW, Harris EF. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent, 2006,31(1):60-67.
8
Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater, 2005,21(5):397-412.
9
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent, 2007,9(1):7-10.
10
Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, et al. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J, 2007,26(1):14-20.
11
Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhe Dent, 2009,11(3):175-190.
12
Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, et al. Bond strengths of oneand two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent,2007,97(4):216-222.
13
Schüpbach P, Krejci I, Lutz F. Dentin bonding: effect of tubule orientation on hybrid-layer formation. Eur J Oral Sci,1997,105(4):344-352.
14
Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, et al. Bonding effectiveness of two contemporary self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Dent, 2009,37(11):872-883.
[1] 曾铖, 张剑. 抗体药物偶联物在三阴性乳腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 140-145.
[2] 梁旭, 宋国红. 2023年激素受体阳性/HER-2阴性乳腺癌治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 71-77.
[3] 刘佳璇, 徐兵河. 中国乳腺癌临床研究年度进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 259-265.
[4] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[5] 王雅楠, 刘丹, 曹正浓, 贾慧敏. 儿童迟发性先天性膈疝患儿的临床诊治特点分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 410-419.
[6] 冯晨, 郑英, 武童, 李敬, 夏铭笛, 鲁娟娟, 党玉洁. 环状染色体携带者助孕结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 58-64.
[7] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[8] 阮星星, 黄智渊, 刘芙香, 狄金明. 从临床医师诊治患者的思路出发撰写临床研究论文[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 397-401.
[9] 陈丽璇, 窦培宁, 肖扬. 干细胞治疗早发性卵巢功能不全的现状及未来展望[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 239-248.
[10] 吴俊, 陈丽璇, 肖扬. 我国干细胞双备案研究项目分析[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 304-309.
[11] 王红敏, 谢云波, 王彦虎, 王福生. 间充质干细胞治疗新冠病毒感染的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-256.
[12] 任加发, 邬步云, 邢昌赢, 毛慧娟. 2022年急性肾损伤领域基础与临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 276-281.
[13] 刘付蓉, 翁利, 杜斌. 2020年至2022年中国重症医学临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 48-53.
[14] 郑景达, 黄金旗, 张庆贤, 陈煌, 高晓杰. 小腿深静脉入路AngioJet一站式血栓清除治疗全肢型急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 305-309.
[15] 洪雪, 裴月红, 傅瑜. 脑血管病临床研究参与者知情同意的现状及建议[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 545-548.
阅读次数
全文


摘要